Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This argumentation question examines medium-of-instruction policy. A strong argument must be realistic, relevant, and free from absolute, unsubstantiated claims. The policy proposed is extreme: vernacular-only at all levels and in all domains of learning.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
Evaluate I: Claiming the vernacular is the “only way” to enhance performance is overbroad. Student outcomes depend on pedagogy, teacher quality, assessment, home environment, and resources; hence I is weak.Evaluate II: The scarcity of high-quality, up-to-date materials in all regional languages, especially for advanced subjects, is a concrete constraint. Implementing a vernacular-only policy would impede access to knowledge where resources are lacking. II is strong.Verification / Alternative check:
Bilingual or flexible-medium models often perform well, leveraging both mother-tongue comprehension and access to wider literature—supporting the caution in II.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I / Both / Either: Overstate I’s merit; it is an absolute with weak support.Neither: II is clearly relevant and practical.Common Pitfalls:
Equating comprehension benefits in early grades with a universal, all-level mandate without resourcing.Final Answer:
Only argument II is strong
Discussion & Comments