Judicial administration — Should each Indian state have more than one High Court? Statement: Should there be more than one High Court in each state in India? Arguments: I. No. It will waste taxpayers’ money. II. Yes. It will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a long time.
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Argument
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
AOnly argument I is strong
-
BOnly argument II is strong
-
CEither I or II is strong
-
DNeither I nor II is strong
-
EBoth I and II are strong
Answer
Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The question concerns judicial capacity and access to justice. We determine which argument is more compelling given systemic delays in courts.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Case backlogs impair timely justice.
- Infrastructure and benches can influence disposal rates and accessibility.
- Fiscal prudence is important but must be balanced against justice delivery.
Concept / Approach:Arguments that address the core public objective (timely justice) are strong. Generic cost objections, without weighing benefits, are weak.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Argument I: Weak. It labels spending as “waste” without analysis of social benefit or alternatives.Argument II: Strong. It targets the real problem—backlog and delay—by increasing capacity and access.Verification / Alternative check:Judicial reforms often expand benches, circuits, or specialized courts to cut pendency, supporting II.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- I strong / Either / Neither / Both: do not reflect the potency of II compared with I.
Common Pitfalls:Equating any new expenditure with waste without evaluating public value.
Final Answer:Only argument II is strong