Health systems — Should all practising doctors be under Government control with salaries and free treatment? Statement: Should all practising doctors be brought under Government control so they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost? Arguments: I. No. Such a step would be undemocratic. II. Yes. Despite challenges, it would minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

Introduction / Context:
The proposal centralizes medical practice under government pay with free care to patients. We must judge which argument is policy-sound and broadly reasoned.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Unethical practices (overcharging, unnecessary procedures) are public concerns.
• Public systems can set standards, audit, and enforce compliance.
• Strong arguments present substantive policy effects rather than labels.

Concept / Approach:
Argument I rests on a vague “undemocratic” label, offering no constitutional or policy analysis. Argument II links the proposal to improved ethics and oversight, a concrete public benefit.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Many countries use strong public funding/regulation to improve equity and ethics, supporting II’s thrust.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• I strong / Either / Neither / Both: do not reflect that II is substantially stronger than I.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing public management with lack of democracy; democratic systems routinely manage essential services.

Final Answer:
Only argument II is strong