Cause & Effect — Identify the Relationship:\nI. Train services in suburban areas of the city were disrupted for four hours.\nII. The overhead electrical wire snapped between two suburban stations.\nWhich option best captures the causal link between I and II?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: If statement (II) is the cause and statement (I) is its effect.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Rail systems depend on overhead catenary for traction power. A snapped wire typically halts service until repaired.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • II: Overhead wire snapped between two stations.
  • I: Four-hour disruption in services.
  • Assume electric multiple units rely on intact catenary.


Concept / Approach:
Technical failure (II) directly causes service disruption (I). The reverse is illogical.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify failure point: catenary break (II).2) Map consequence: immediate stoppage and safety clearance cause delays (I).3) Therefore, II→I.


Verification / Alternative check:
Disruptions can have other causes, but the stem explicitly provides the wire snap as the proximate cause.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They deny the evident technical causality.


Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking that even short catenary faults can ripple into multi-hour disruptions.


Final Answer:
Option B: Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.

More Questions from Cause and Effect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion