Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If both statements (I) and (II) are effects of independent causes.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Two closures occur on the same day: shops and offices. The aim is to determine whether one closure caused the other, or whether both are effects of a broader (possibly common) cause.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Simultaneous closures often arise from an external cause (e.g., strike, bandh, security advisory, natural event). The stem does not support I→II or II→I directly. Hence, it is safest to treat both as effects of (possibly the same) external cause. In the answer framework, this corresponds to “effects of independent causes.”
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Introduce plausible external triggers (city-wide strike, curfew, storm); both I and II follow as effects.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They impose an unsupported direction or deny linkage to external conditions.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming thematic proximity (same locality) implies direct causation between I and II.
Final Answer:
Option D: Both are effects of (independent/external) causes.
Discussion & Comments