Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Anticipated closures of religious places often trigger pre-closure surges in attendance. The pair invites recognizing that the decision to close (II) can immediately increase turnout beforehand (I).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Imminent scarcity of access (closure) increases present demand (attendance), especially on a convenient day (Sunday).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Analogous patterns appear before renovation shutdowns in many public venues.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A/C/D misrepresent or deny the cause; B fits the timeline and incentive structure.
Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring the calendar cue (last Sunday pre-closure).
Final Answer:
if statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
Discussion & Comments