Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Anticipated closures of religious places often trigger pre-closure surges in attendance. The pair invites recognizing that the decision to close (II) can immediately increase turnout beforehand (I).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Imminent scarcity of access (closure) increases present demand (attendance), especially on a convenient day (Sunday).
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) II → I: Closure announcement is a proximate cause of pre-closure rush.2) I → II is implausible; attendance cannot cause the prior administrative decision to repair/close.3) Hence, choose B.Verification / Alternative check:Analogous patterns appear before renovation shutdowns in many public venues.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:A/C/D misrepresent or deny the cause; B fits the timeline and incentive structure.
Common Pitfalls:Ignoring the calendar cue (last Sunday pre-closure).
Final Answer:if statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
Discussion & Comments