Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: If I is the immediate cause and II is its effect.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The pair links a clear safety lapse (expired LPG cylinders) with an adverse event (kitchen fire). We must check whether the lapse can serve as an immediate cause.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
LPG leakage readily explains ignition in a kitchen environment with open flames or electrical sparks. Thus I is a plausible immediate cause of II.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Substitute scenario: properly maintained cylinders lower fire risk, supporting I as a critical causal factor here.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
B reverses causality; C/D deny the immediate link indicated by common safety mechanics.
Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring proximate hazards in kitchens (flame, heat, electricals) that can ignite leaked gas.
Final Answer:
If I is the immediate cause and II is its effect.
Discussion & Comments