Cause & Effect — Safety compliance and consequences.\nI. The LPG cylinders supplied to the restaurant kitchen were past their expiry date.\nII. The restaurant kitchen caught fire.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: If I is the immediate cause and II is its effect.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The pair links a clear safety lapse (expired LPG cylinders) with an adverse event (kitchen fire). We must check whether the lapse can serve as an immediate cause.



Given Data / Assumptions:


  • I: Expired LPG cylinders were supplied.
  • II: Fire occurred in the restaurant kitchen.
  • Expired cylinders may have degraded valves or seals, increasing leak risk.


Concept / Approach:
LPG leakage readily explains ignition in a kitchen environment with open flames or electrical sparks. Thus I is a plausible immediate cause of II.



Step-by-Step Solution:


1) I → II: Safety non-compliance with gas cylinders can directly lead to fire incidents via leaks.2) II → I is illogical: a fire does not retroactively cause cylinders to be expired.3) Non-causal alternatives do not fit as well as A.


Verification / Alternative check:
Substitute scenario: properly maintained cylinders lower fire risk, supporting I as a critical causal factor here.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
B reverses causality; C/D deny the immediate link indicated by common safety mechanics.



Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring proximate hazards in kitchens (flame, heat, electricals) that can ignite leaked gas.



Final Answer:
If I is the immediate cause and II is its effect.

More Questions from Cause and Effect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion