Cause & Effect — Safety compliance and consequences. I. The LPG cylinders supplied to the restaurant kitchen were past their expiry date. II. The restaurant kitchen caught fire.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: If I is the immediate cause and II is its effect.

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:The pair links a clear safety lapse (expired LPG cylinders) with an adverse event (kitchen fire). We must check whether the lapse can serve as an immediate cause.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • I: Expired LPG cylinders were supplied.
  • II: Fire occurred in the restaurant kitchen.
  • Expired cylinders may have degraded valves or seals, increasing leak risk.

Concept / Approach:LPG leakage readily explains ignition in a kitchen environment with open flames or electrical sparks. Thus I is a plausible immediate cause of II.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) I → II: Safety non-compliance with gas cylinders can directly lead to fire incidents via leaks.2) II → I is illogical: a fire does not retroactively cause cylinders to be expired.3) Non-causal alternatives do not fit as well as A.

Verification / Alternative check:Substitute scenario: properly maintained cylinders lower fire risk, supporting I as a critical causal factor here.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:B reverses causality; C/D deny the immediate link indicated by common safety mechanics.

Common Pitfalls:Ignoring proximate hazards in kitchens (flame, heat, electricals) that can ignite leaked gas.

Final Answer:If I is the immediate cause and II is its effect.

More Questions from Cause and Effect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion