Cause & Effect — Policing and crime outcomes.\nI. Police authorities recently increased evening-hour vigil in the locality.\nII. There has been a considerable reduction in petty crimes in the locality.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: if statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Law-enforcement inputs (visibility, patrols) often deter opportunistic offenses. The pair seeks recognition of the causal chain from policing intensity to crime incidence.



Given Data / Assumptions:


  • I: Increased evening vigilance by police.
  • II: Noticeable drop in petty crime rates.
  • Deterrence and rapid response constrain petty offenders.


Concept / Approach:
Increased patrols create perceived risk and reduce criminal opportunity windows, yielding immediate effects on petty crimes.



Step-by-Step Solution:


1) I → II: Heightened vigilance plausibly and directly reduces petty crime.2) II → I would imply falling crime caused the decision to increase patrols; the stem’s recency framing suggests the opposite.3) Choose A.


Verification / Alternative check:
Crime drops coincident with patrol surges are common in hotspot policing studies.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
B reverses direction; C/D deny linkage.



Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring time ordering: “recently increased vigil” then “has been reduction.”



Final Answer:
if statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion