Cause & Effect — Policing and crime outcomes. I. Police authorities recently increased evening-hour vigil in the locality. II. There has been a considerable reduction in petty crimes in the locality.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: if statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:Law-enforcement inputs (visibility, patrols) often deter opportunistic offenses. The pair seeks recognition of the causal chain from policing intensity to crime incidence.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • I: Increased evening vigilance by police.
  • II: Noticeable drop in petty crime rates.
  • Deterrence and rapid response constrain petty offenders.

Concept / Approach:Increased patrols create perceived risk and reduce criminal opportunity windows, yielding immediate effects on petty crimes.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) I → II: Heightened vigilance plausibly and directly reduces petty crime.2) II → I would imply falling crime caused the decision to increase patrols; the stem’s recency framing suggests the opposite.3) Choose A.

Verification / Alternative check:Crime drops coincident with patrol surges are common in hotspot policing studies.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:B reverses direction; C/D deny linkage.

Common Pitfalls:Ignoring time ordering: “recently increased vigil” then “has been reduction.”

Final Answer:if statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.

More Questions from Cause and Effect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion