Cause & Effect — Identify the Relationship: I. A majority of residents in a housing society attended a dinner hosted by one member. II. Most residents routinely invite other members to functions at their homes. Which option best captures the causal link between I and II?

Introduction / Context:The item contrasts a culture of mutual invitations with high attendance at a particular dinner. We must test which implies which.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• II describes a general norm: frequent invitations among residents.
• I describes an instance: majority attendance at one dinner.

Concept / Approach:Norms drive participation. If members routinely invite and attend one another’s functions (II), then a large turnout at a specific dinner (I) is a natural effect.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:One crowded dinner cannot by itself create a society-wide invitation culture; hence I→II is weak.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:They invert direction or sever an obvious social link.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing single-event popularity with long-standing social norms.

Final Answer:Option B: Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.