Question 1

In the House of the People (Lok Sabha), how many parliamentary seats are allocated to the State of Goa?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Lok Sabha, or House of the People, is composed of members directly elected from territorial constituencies in the States and Union Territories. The number of seats allotted to each State is based on its population, subject to constitutional provisions and periodic delimitation. Questions about how many Lok Sabha constituencies a particular State has are common in competitive exams. This question focuses on the small coastal State of Goa. Given Data / Assumptions: The question concerns allocation of Lok Sabha seats to Goa. The options provide four possible numbers: 2, 13, 20, and 25. Goa is one of the smallest States in terms of area and population. We assume current standard allocation as per existing delimitation. Concept / Approach: Goa, because of its small population, has a relatively small representation in the Lok Sabha. The State is divided into two parliamentary constituencies: North Goa and South Goa. Therefore, Goa has 2 seats in the Lok Sabha. Higher numbers such as 13, 20, or 25 correspond to larger States with significantly higher populations and more constituencies. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Goa is a small State in terms of population and area. Step 2: Remember that Goa is divided into two Lok Sabha constituencies, commonly known as North Goa and South Goa. Step 3: From this, conclude that Goa has 2 seats in the Lok Sabha. Step 4: Compare this with the options provided. Step 5: Choose 2 as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by comparing Goa to similarly small States and Union Territories. It would be unreasonable for a small State like Goa to have as many as 13, 20, or 25 constituencies, which are numbers typical of larger States like Punjab, Kerala, or Gujarat. Official lists of parliamentary constituencies and Election Commission data confirm that Goa has exactly two Lok Sabha seats. This cross check supports the answer 2. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, 13, is the number of Lok Sabha seats for some medium sized States such as Punjab, not for Goa. Option C, 20, again matches larger States but not this small coastal State. Option D, 25, likewise belongs to much larger States with bigger populations. These numbers are inconsistent with Goa's small geographical and demographic profile. Common Pitfalls: Examinees sometimes mix up the number of seats for different States, especially when multiple States have similar sounding sizes or when they rely on guesswork based on memory. A mistake can also arise from confusing assembly constituencies with parliamentary constituencies. To avoid errors, remember that Goa has 40 seats in its Legislative Assembly but only 2 seats in the Lok Sabha. Final Answer: The State of Goa is allocated 2 seats in the Lok Sabha.

Question 2

Which country has the longest written national Constitution in the world in terms of its length and detail?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Constitutions differ widely in their form and length. Some are short and broad, while others are detailed and elaborate. The Constitution of India is famous for being one of the most comprehensive written constitutions in the world. This question asks you to identify which country has the longest written national Constitution in terms of its extent and detail, a classic static general knowledge fact. Given Data / Assumptions: The question is about the length of written national Constitutions. Options include the United States of America, China, India, and Great Britain. We assume a comparison at the level of national Constitutions, not state or provincial documents. We focus on written, single document Constitutions, not unwritten or partly codified systems. Concept / Approach: The Constitution of India, adopted in 1950, is widely regarded as the longest written national Constitution in the world. It contains numerous Articles, Schedules, and detailed provisions on Union and State relations, Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, special provisions for various groups, and administrative structures. In comparison, the Constitution of the United States is relatively short and general. Great Britain does not have a single written Constitution but relies on a combination of statutes, conventions, and judicial decisions. China's Constitution, though important, is not as long or detailed as India's fundamental law. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Indian Constitution is frequently described in textbooks as the lengthiest written Constitution in the world. Step 2: Compare this with the United States Constitution, which is famous for its brevity. Step 3: Note that Great Britain does not have a single codified Constitution at all. Step 4: Recognise that the Chinese Constitution, while significant, is not as extensive as India's in terms of detailed Articles and Schedules. Step 5: Select India as the country with the longest written national Constitution. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this through any standard Indian Polity textbook, which introduces the Constitution by mentioning its extraordinary length and detail. It is regularly noted that India's Constitution draws on many sources and covers a very wide range of subjects, from Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles to local bodies and emergency provisions. In contrast, the United States Constitution has only a handful of Articles and amendments, and Great Britain relies on an uncodified constitutional framework. These comparisons confirm India's position as having the lengthiest written Constitution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, the United States of America, has one of the shortest written Constitutions, not the longest. Option B, China, does have a written Constitution, but it is not as long or detailed as India's. Option D, Great Britain, does not have a single written Constitution; its constitutional system is largely unwritten or partly codified in various statutes and conventions. Hence, none of these options match the known fact that India has the longest written national Constitution. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes assume that highly influential or older constitutions, such as that of the United States, might also be the largest, but influence and age are unrelated to length. Another pitfall is overlooking the fact that Great Britain lacks a codified Constitution, which immediately removes it from consideration. To avoid confusion, always remember the specific exam line that the Constitution of India is the lengthiest written Constitution in the world. Final Answer: The country with the longest written national Constitution in the world is India.

Question 3

The Constitution of India was drafted and framed by which of the following bodies?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The process through which the Constitution of India was created is a central topic in Indian Polity. Knowing who framed the Constitution is essential for understanding its legitimacy and democratic roots. The body responsible for drafting and adopting the Constitution is a direct expression of the will of the people of India at the time of independence. This question asks you to identify that body from among several options. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is the framing and drafting of the Constitution of India. The options include Planning Commission, Constituent Assembly, President, and Working Committee. We assume familiarity with the basic historical events leading up to the adoption of the Constitution. The focus is on the official body, not on individual leaders or committees that contributed ideas. Concept / Approach: The Constitution of India was framed by the Constituent Assembly, which was elected partly by provincial legislatures and partly nominated from princely States, functioning between 1946 and 1950. The Assembly debated, amended, and finally adopted the Constitution on 26 November 1949, and it came into force on 26 January 1950. The Planning Commission was established later to plan economic development, the President is an organ under the Constitution, and the term Working Committee generally refers to party committees, not the constitutional drafting body. Thus, the correct answer is the Constituent Assembly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Constitution was prepared before the Republic was formally established. Step 2: Remember that a special body called the Constituent Assembly was formed to draft and adopt the Constitution. Step 3: Note that the Planning Commission was an institution created later for economic planning and did not write the Constitution. Step 4: The President is a constitutional office created by the Constitution, not the framer of it. Step 5: Therefore, select Constituent Assembly as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Standard history and polity sources clearly state that the Constituent Assembly met in multiple sessions, appointed drafting committees, and debated every part of the Constitution. Dr B R Ambedkar served as the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, which reported to the Constituent Assembly as a whole. The final document was signed by members of the Constituent Assembly. Official records and all reputable textbooks constantly emphasise that the Constitution was framed by this Assembly, confirming the correctness of the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Planning Commission, was set up in 1950 to plan economic development and did not exist when the Constitution was being drafted. Option C, President, refers to the head of the State under the Constitution and has powers defined by the Constitution, but the President did not frame it. Option D, Working Committee, typically refers to internal committees of political parties such as the Congress Working Committee; these bodies may have influenced political demands but were not the constitutional drafting authority. Therefore, none of these options correctly represent the body that framed the Constitution. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students mix up the roles of various committees and constitutional organs, confusing the Drafting Committee with the larger Constituent Assembly or assuming that prominent individuals like the President were responsible for framing. It is important to distinguish between the Drafting Committee, which prepared a draft, and the Constituent Assembly, which debated and adopted the final Constitution. The Assembly as a whole is credited with framing the Constitution, not any single organ or committee. Final Answer: The Constitution of India was drafted and framed by the Constituent Assembly.

Question 4

According to the Constitution of India, what is the minimum age required to qualify as a candidate for Lok Sabha elections?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Eligibility conditions for contesting elections to different legislative bodies are a fundamental part of Indian Polity. The Constitution specifies minimum age requirements for membership in the Lok Sabha, the Rajya Sabha, and State Legislatures. This question focuses on the minimum age at which a person can stand as a candidate for election to the Lok Sabha, the lower house of Parliament. Given Data / Assumptions: The office in question is that of a Member of the Lok Sabha. The options offer ages 25, 30, 21, and 18 years. We assume normal eligibility conditions regarding citizenship and other legal criteria are satisfied. The question is only about minimum age, not about maximum age or other qualifications. Concept / Approach: Article 84 of the Constitution lays down qualifications for membership of Parliament. It states that a person shall not be qualified to be chosen as a member of the Lok Sabha unless they are at least 25 years of age. For the Rajya Sabha, the minimum age is higher at 30 years. The ages 21 and 18 are associated with other aspects such as voting rights or membership in certain local bodies, but not with Lok Sabha candidacy. Therefore, the correct minimum age for Lok Sabha elections is 25 years. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Article 84 specifies the minimum ages for Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha membership. Step 2: Remember that the Lok Sabha has a minimum age of 25 years. Step 3: Note that the Rajya Sabha has a minimum age of 30 years, which helps distinguish the two Houses. Step 4: Recognise that 18 years is the voting age, not the candidacy age for Lok Sabha. Step 5: Select 25 years as the correct minimum age for contesting Lok Sabha elections. Verification / Alternative check: Official Election Commission documents and standard polity texts consistently mention that any candidate for Lok Sabha must be at least 25 years old. The Representation of the People Acts and related rules also refer back to constitutional qualifications. Comparing with State Legislative Assembly requirements, which also usually require 25 years, provides another check. Since 18 is clearly associated with the voting age and 30 with the Rajya Sabha, 25 years stands out as the correct figure for the Lok Sabha. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, 30 years, is the minimum age for membership of the Rajya Sabha, not the Lok Sabha. Option C, 21 years, may apply to certain local elections or older statutes, but it is not the age for Lok Sabha membership. Option D, 18 years, is the minimum voting age in India after the 61st Amendment but does not qualify one to stand for Parliament. These ages therefore do not meet the constitutional requirement for Lok Sabha candidates. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes confuse the voting age of 18 with the age of eligibility for contesting elections, assuming both are the same. Others mix up the different age limits for various representative bodies, such as using the Rajya Sabha age for the Lok Sabha. To avoid this, it is helpful to remember a simple rule: 25 years for Lok Sabha and most State Assemblies, 30 years for Rajya Sabha and most Legislative Councils. Final Answer: The minimum age required to qualify as a candidate for Lok Sabha elections is 25 years.

Question 5

Who was the first Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha in independent India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Lok Sabha, as the lower house of Parliament, functions under the leadership of a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker. While the first Speaker, G. V. Mavalankar, is widely remembered, exams also test your knowledge of the first Deputy Speaker. Basic awareness of the early presiding officers of Lok Sabha is part of Indian political history and parliamentary procedure. This question asks you to identify the first Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Given Data / Assumptions: The office in question is the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha. The time frame is the early years after independence. Options include G. V. Mavalankar, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar, and Dr P V Cherian. We assume familiarity with the fact that G. V. Mavalankar was the first Speaker, not Deputy Speaker. Concept / Approach: In the first Lok Sabha, G. V. Mavalankar served as the Speaker, and M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar served as the first Deputy Speaker. Later, Ayyangar himself became the Speaker after Mavalankar. Recognising this sequence helps you identify M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar as the first Deputy Speaker. The other names in the options are famous figures, but they did not hold this specific office at that time. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that G. V. Mavalankar was the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Step 2: Remember that M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar was his Deputy and thus the first Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Step 3: Note that Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan served as Vice President and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, not Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Step 4: Recognise that Dr P V Cherian is not associated with this early Lok Sabha presiding office. Step 5: Choose M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Historical lists of Speakers and Deputy Speakers of the Lok Sabha clearly show that the first combination was G. V. Mavalankar as Speaker and M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar as Deputy Speaker. After Mavalankar's demise, Ayyangar was elevated to the office of Speaker. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan is prominently noted as the first Vice President of India and ex officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, which confirms his association with the upper house. This cross check reinforces that Ayyangar is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, G. V. Mavalankar, was the first Speaker, not the first Deputy Speaker. Option B, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, was the first Vice President of India and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, not a presiding officer of the Lok Sabha. Option D, Dr P V Cherian, is not recorded as the first Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha. These options may appear because of the prominence of these personalities, but they do not match the specific office asked in the question. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the Speaker with the Deputy Speaker and to pick G. V. Mavalankar since he is strongly associated with the early Lok Sabha. Another pitfall is mixing roles between the two Houses of Parliament, for example linking Radhakrishnan with the Lok Sabha rather than the Rajya Sabha. To avoid confusion, remember the pair for the first Lok Sabha: Mavalankar as Speaker and Ayyangar as Deputy Speaker. Final Answer: The first Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha in independent India was M. Ananthasayanam Ayyangar.

Question 6

In the Indian constitutional practice, in the presence of which authority does the President of India take the oath of office?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The swearing in ceremony of the President of India is an important constitutional event. The oath affirms the President's commitment to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the law. Examinations often ask who administers this oath and in whose presence it is taken. This question focuses on identifying the authority before whom the President takes the oath of office. Given Data / Assumptions: The office in question is the President of India. The subject is the oath of office at the time of assumption of the presidency. Options include Vice President, Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief Justice of India, and Attorney General. We assume the normal situation and not exceptional cases such as when the Chief Justice is unavailable. Concept / Approach: Article 60 of the Constitution provides that the President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe an oath or affirmation in the presence of the Chief Justice of India, or in the absence of the Chief Justice, the senior most judge of the Supreme Court available. Therefore, the authority normally associated with the oath taking ceremony of the President is the Chief Justice of India. The President does not take the oath before the Vice President, Speaker, or Attorney General under the constitutional text. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Constitution specifies who administers the oath to the President. Step 2: Article 60 states that the oath is to be made in the presence of the Chief Justice of India. Step 3: In the absence of the Chief Justice, the President takes the oath before the senior most judge of the Supreme Court, but this is an exception. Step 4: Review the given options and identify the Chief Justice of India among them. Step 5: Select Chief Justice of India as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: News coverage of presidential inaugurations consistently shows the Chief Justice administering the oath and the ceremony taking place in the presence of this judicial authority. Constitutional commentaries and standard textbooks on Indian Polity also quote Article 60 and emphasise this procedure. There is no provision for the Vice President, Speaker, or Attorney General to administer or preside over the presidential oath of office, which confirms that the Chief Justice of India is the correct authority mentioned in the Constitution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Vice President, is next in line to act as President in certain contingencies but does not administer or preside over the President's oath. Option B, Lok Sabha Speaker, presides over the lower house of Parliament and has no constitutional role in the President's oath taking process. Option D, Attorney General, is the chief legal adviser to the government but is not involved in administering oaths to high constitutional authorities. These roles are therefore not correct answers to the question. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes confuse the oath taking procedures for different offices or assume that all high office holders swear in before the same authority. It is also possible to mix up the role of the Chief Justice with that of the Speaker or Vice President. To avoid mistakes, remember specific pairings: the President takes the oath in the presence of the Chief Justice of India, while judges of the Supreme Court take their oaths before the President, and Members of Parliament take their oaths before the presiding officers of their respective Houses. Final Answer: In normal constitutional practice, the President of India takes the oath of office in the presence of the Chief Justice of India.

Question 7

Who was the first Indian to serve as the Chief Election Commissioner of India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Conducting free and fair elections in a large democracy like India requires an independent and capable Election Commission. The first Chief Election Commissioner of India played a crucial role in organising the country's initial general elections after independence. Knowing the name of this first Chief Election Commissioner is a common question in exams on Indian Polity and modern history. Given Data / Assumptions: The post under discussion is the Chief Election Commissioner of India. The question asks for the first person to hold this office after independence. Options include Morarji Desai, Sukumar Sen, Sardar Patel, and V.S Ramadevi. We assume you are aware of the basic roles of these political and administrative figures. Concept / Approach: Sukumar Sen, a distinguished Indian civil servant, was appointed as the first Chief Election Commissioner of India. He supervised the historic first general elections held in 1951 to 1952, which were massive in scale and complexity. His work laid the foundation for India's electoral system. Morarji Desai later became Prime Minister, Sardar Patel was Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, and V.S Ramadevi was one of the later Election Commissioners and also Governor, but none of them was the first Chief Election Commissioner. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the first general elections in India were held in 1951 to 1952 under the supervision of the newly constituted Election Commission. Step 2: Remember that Sukumar Sen, an Indian Civil Service officer, was appointed as the first Chief Election Commissioner. Step 3: Note that Morarji Desai is associated primarily with the office of Prime Minister and not with the Election Commission. Step 4: Recognise that Sardar Patel was a key political leader and first Home Minister, not the head of the Election Commission. Step 5: Choose Sukumar Sen from the options as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Lists of Chief Election Commissioners published by the Election Commission of India and standard polity texts begin with Sukumar Sen as the first name. They highlight his role in conducting the first general elections and sometimes discuss his subsequent work in other countries as an election expert. The other personalities mentioned in the options are famous for different roles, such as political leadership or later constitutional positions. This documentary evidence confirms that Sukumar Sen was the first Chief Election Commissioner. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Morarji Desai, was a senior political leader who served as Prime Minister but never as Chief Election Commissioner. Option C, Sardar Patel, served as Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister and was instrumental in integrating princely States, but did not head the Election Commission. Option D, V.S Ramadevi, served later as an Election Commissioner and held gubernatorial posts, but she was not the first Chief Election Commissioner. None of these names match the historical record for the very first holder of the office. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick a very prominent political leader, such as Sardar Patel, assuming that he must have held most top positions at the time. Another error is confusing the first Chief Election Commissioner with later Commissioners or Governors with similar sounding roles. To avoid such mistakes, it is useful to associate Sukumar Sen specifically with the first general elections and with the origin of the Election Commission's work in India. Final Answer: The first Indian to serve as the Chief Election Commissioner of India was Sukumar Sen.

Question 8

As per the political philosophy of John Locke, which one of the following is not considered a natural right of an individual human being?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic political philosophy, specifically the theory of natural rights as explained by the English thinker John Locke. Many questions in political science and Indian polity refer to Locke because his ideas about natural rights strongly influenced modern democratic constitutions, including key ideas that later shaped fundamental rights. To answer correctly, a learner must recall which rights Locke explicitly classified as natural and understand how modern democratic rights such as the right to vote developed later as political rights rather than original natural rights. Given Data / Assumptions: John Locke discussed a set of natural rights that belong to every individual in the state of nature. These natural rights are usually listed as life, liberty and property. The options given are liberty, equality, property and right to vote. The task is to identify which option is not one of the original natural rights described by Locke. Concept / Approach: Locke argued that before the formation of governments, human beings already possess certain basic rights simply by being human. These are called natural rights. According to his famous formulation, individuals naturally possess the right to life, the right to liberty and the right to own property. Later, when people form a political society, the main purpose of government is to protect these natural rights. Other rights, such as the right to vote, are important democratic or political rights created by constitutional arrangements, but they are not part of Locke's original natural rights trio. Equality is an important idea in Locke's theory, because he argued that all human beings are naturally equal, but when exam questions ask specifically about natural rights, the standard list is life, liberty and property. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the standard list of natural rights given by John Locke: life, liberty and property. Step 2: Compare the options with this standard list. Liberty matches one of the three natural rights. Step 3: Property also matches the third element of Locke's standard list. Step 4: Equality is an important background principle in Locke's thought, because he argued that people are naturally equal in status, but it is not usually listed as a separate natural right along with life, liberty and property. Step 5: The right to vote is a political or democratic right that arises under a particular constitutional system. It is not one of the classical natural rights that exist before government is formed. Step 6: Therefore, among the given options, the most clearly incorrect as a natural right in Locke's sense is the right to vote. Verification / Alternative check: A quick way to check is to remember that many textbooks summarise Locke with the phrase life, liberty and property when discussing natural rights. None of these words include the act of voting. The right to vote depends on citizenship, age limits and electoral laws that are framed by a state. That makes it a civil or political right rather than a natural right in Locke's original framework. Hence, choosing right to vote as the answer is consistent with widely accepted summaries of his theory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Liberty is part of Locke's famous trio of natural rights, so it cannot be the right answer. Property is also explicitly mentioned by Locke as a natural right that government must protect. Equality, while not always listed as a separate natural right alongside liberty and property, is a core assumption in Locke's theory about the equal moral status of individuals and therefore more closely connected to natural rights than the specific institutional right to vote. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse all important democratic rights with natural rights and assume that every modern civil or political right must be natural. Another mistake is to treat equality and the right to vote as the same type of right because both relate to fairness. In political theory, however, natural rights refer to basic claims people hold even before a state exists, whereas rights like voting come into existence only after a constitutional and legal system has been created. Mixing these categories can lead to confusion in many polity questions. Final Answer: The option that is not considered a natural right in John Locke's classic formulation is Right to vote.

Question 9

In the Lok Sabha of the Indian Parliament, how many seats are reserved in total for representatives belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines knowledge of the composition of the Lok Sabha, the House of the People, in the Parliament of India. A key feature of the Indian Constitution is the reservation of seats for members of the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) to ensure inclusive representation. Understanding the total number of reserved seats helps learners appreciate how constitutional provisions translate into actual parliamentary structure. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers to the total number of Lok Sabha seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes taken together. The options given are 39, 85, 109 and 131. The context is the standard composition of Lok Sabha after the relevant delimitation based on census data. No trick is implied about a particular year; the usual examination reference is the widely accepted standard figure used in polity textbooks. Concept / Approach: The Constitution of India allows reservation of Lok Sabha seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in proportion to their population. The exact numbers may be adjusted by delimitation orders from time to time, but for many years a well known figure has been used in competitive exams. In this framework, there are separate counts for SC reserved seats and ST reserved seats, and the required answer is the combined total. Standard polity references mention that around one fourth of Lok Sabha seats are reserved for SC and ST together, and the precise total is 131 seats during the period usually referred to in such questions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Lok Sabha has a maximum strength of 552 members, although the actual filled strength is slightly lower. Step 2: Remember the commonly quoted figures for reserved seats, which are 84 seats for Scheduled Castes and 47 seats for Scheduled Tribes in the standard configuration. Step 3: Add these two numbers: 84 for Scheduled Castes plus 47 for Scheduled Tribes. Step 4: Perform the addition 84 + 47 which equals 131. Step 5: Compare this total, 131, with the options given in the question. Step 6: The only option that matches this combined total is 131, so that is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification method is to cross check with standard Indian polity books that list Lok Sabha composition. These books usually mention that there are 131 reserved seats, with 84 for Scheduled Castes and 47 for Scheduled Tribes. Another memory check is to remember that the number is just above 130, which eliminates all other smaller options like 39, 85 and 109 that are either too low or not the agreed standard total for SC plus ST seats combined. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The figure 39 is far too low to represent combined SC and ST representation in a large country like India. The number 85 does not reflect the combined total and is closer to only one of the categories. The number 109 is still lower than the accepted total of 131. Hence, all these options do not match the established combined reservation figure in the Lok Sabha. Only 131 corresponds to the recognised total for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes together. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to remember only one of the category totals, such as 84 or 47, and then guess an incorrect number that looks similar. Some candidates also confuse reserved Lok Sabha seats with reserved seats in State Legislative Assemblies, which are different. Another source of error is mixing up old and new figures across different census based delimitations without checking which standard is commonly used in exam questions. To avoid such confusion, it is helpful to remember both the separate numbers and their simple sum of 131. Final Answer: The total number of seats reserved in Lok Sabha for representatives of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes together is 131.

Question 10

In the context of Indian political parties, what is the full form of the abbreviation AITC?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks familiarity with the names and abbreviations of major Indian political parties. Election related news, results and political analyses regularly refer to parties by their short forms, so aspirants for competitive exams must recognise these abbreviations accurately. AITC is a prominent national level party based mainly in the state of West Bengal and active in Indian Parliament, so its full form is often asked in general knowledge and polity sections. Given Data / Assumptions: The abbreviation given is AITC. The context is clearly about an Indian political party. Four possible expansions are provided in the options. The task is to choose the correct full form that matches the well known party name used in Indian politics. Concept / Approach: Recognising political party abbreviations combines factual memory with some pattern observation. The letters A, I, T and C must correspond to the first letters of the words in the party's official name. In Indian politics, AITC is associated with a party led by Mamata Banerjee that originated in West Bengal. The party is commonly called the Trinamool Congress, and its full official name is All India Trinamool Congress. Other suggested expansions in the options are distractors that sound similar but do not match the real organisation registered by the Election Commission of India. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that AITC is a major party that grew out of a split in the Indian National Congress in West Bengal and elsewhere. Step 2: Remember that this party is popularly called Trinamool Congress and is led by a chief minister of West Bengal. Step 3: Expand the abbreviation logically: A for All, I for India, T for Trinamool and C for Congress, creating the name All India Trinamool Congress. Step 4: Compare this vivid recollection with the options listed in the question. Step 5: Option A reads All India Trinamool Congress, which exactly matches the known full name of the party represented by AITC. Step 6: Therefore, mark All India Trinamool Congress as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification is to recall newspaper abbreviations where party names appear next to election results. In these tables, AITC appears in the column heading and the full party name is usually printed in the legend as All India Trinamool Congress. Also, the word Telugu in some of the other options suggests a link to Andhra Pradesh or Telangana, whereas AITC is widely associated with West Bengal, which confirms that those options are misleading. This cross check reinforces that only the first option fits both geography and established usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: All India Telugu Congress suggests a party specifically connected to Telugu speaking regions, which does not match the West Bengal based AITC. All India Telugu Communist is similar but adds the word Communist, which would likely be abbreviated differently, such as AITCP or similar, and is not a real major party name. All India Trinamool Communist sounds like a blend of Trinamool and Communist ideologies and does not refer to an actually registered national or state party in common use, so it is also incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes rush through abbreviations and choose an option that looks grammatically neat without connecting the name to real political history or prominent leaders. Another common error is to associate AITC with any party that has Congress in its name, ignoring the distinctive word Trinamool that identifies this specific party. To avoid such mistakes, it is helpful to anchor each abbreviation to a mental image of its main leader, state base and symbol, which makes recall more stable in examinations. Final Answer: The full form of the Indian political party abbreviated as AITC is All India Trinamool Congress.

Question 11

In the Council of States (Rajya Sabha), how many parliamentary seats are allocated to the state of Karnataka?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines knowledge of the representation of individual states in the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian Parliament. The number of seats allotted to each state in Rajya Sabha depends largely on its population and is fixed by law. Competitive examinations often ask about the seat strength of important states like Karnataka, so understanding how many members a state sends to Rajya Sabha is an important part of basic Indian polity. Given Data / Assumptions: The question is specifically about the number of Rajya Sabha seats of Karnataka. The options given are 12, 16, 18 and 31. The allocation refers to normal representation under the constitutional and statutory scheme, not a temporary special arrangement. No trick regarding nominated members is involved, because the question clearly mentions the state of Karnataka. Concept / Approach: The Rajya Sabha is a permanent house that represents the states and union territories at the federal level. Seats in Rajya Sabha are allocated to states broadly in proportion to population, and this allocation is provided in the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution and subsequent statutory changes. Each state therefore has a fixed number of seats. Karnataka, being a large southern state, has a moderate but significant representation. Remembering these numbers is largely a matter of factual learning, but it becomes easier when grouped with other southern states for comparison in study notes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the total strength of Rajya Sabha is 245 members, which includes both elected and nominated members. Step 2: Remember that seats are distributed among states such as Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and others according to population. Step 3: Karnataka, as per the standard allocation used in polity books, has been allotted 12 seats in the Rajya Sabha. Step 4: Compare this recalled figure of 12 with the four options provided in the question. Step 5: Option A matches exactly with the remembered figure of 12 seats for Karnataka. Step 6: Therefore, the correct answer is that Karnataka has 12 Rajya Sabha seats. Verification / Alternative check: A useful verification approach is to remember relative sizes: states such as Uttar Pradesh have more than 30 Rajya Sabha seats, whereas medium sized states like Karnataka and Gujarat have fewer, usually in the low teens. Since one of the options is 31, which is closer to the largest state allocations, it can be rejected. The numbers 16 and 18 are higher than the commonly cited value for Karnataka, leaving 12 as the most realistic and widely accepted figure, confirming the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The option 16 does not correspond to the standard constitutional allocation for Karnataka and would fit some other state. The option 18 is also higher than the accepted count for Karnataka and contradicts official tables. The option 31 is extremely high and corresponds to the representation of the most populous state in India, not Karnataka. Hence, these three numbers do not match the fixed allocation used in legal and exam references. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often confuse Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha numbers or mix up seat counts for different states. Another error is assuming that any large state must have 20 or more seats, without checking actual data. Some learners also memorise only the totals for a few states and guess for the rest. To reduce mistakes, it helps to create a small table with key states and their Rajya Sabha seats, especially those frequently mentioned in exams, and revise it regularly. Final Answer: The number of Rajya Sabha parliamentary seats allocated to Karnataka is 12.

Question 12

Under the Constitution of India, Article 44 on a uniform civil code for the citizens forms part of which section of the constitutional scheme?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with the location of Article 44 within the structure of the Constitution of India. Article 44 refers to the idea of a uniform civil code for citizens, which has been a subject of debate in Indian politics and law. To answer correctly, a learner should know that certain articles belong to the section on Fundamental Rights, while others belong to the Directive Principles of State Policy. Understanding this placement is important for grasping the nature and enforceability of different constitutional provisions. Given Data / Assumptions: Article 44 of the Constitution mentions the phrase uniform civil code for the citizens. The options mention Directive Principles, Union Government provisions, State Government provisions and Fundamental Rights. The question asks specifically which part of the constitutional scheme contains Article 44. No other article number is involved, so the task is purely about correct classification. Concept / Approach: The Constitution is divided into parts such as Part III for Fundamental Rights and Part IV for Directive Principles of State Policy. Fundamental Rights are justiciable, meaning they can be enforced in a court of law, whereas Directive Principles are non-justiciable guidelines meant to direct the state in policy making. Article 44 belongs to Part IV, which contains Directive Principles of State Policy. Therefore, the provision on uniform civil code is a directive for the state rather than an immediately enforceable right of citizens. Recognising this distinction is central to many questions in Indian polity. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Part III of the Constitution covers Articles 12 to 35 and deals with Fundamental Rights. Step 2: Remember that Part IV of the Constitution covers Articles 36 to 51 and contains the Directive Principles of State Policy. Step 3: Know that Article 44 appears in Part IV and states that the state shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India. Step 4: Compare this knowledge with the four options given in the question. Step 5: The only option that correctly identifies the segment of the Constitution where Article 44 is located is the Directive Principles of State Policy. Step 6: Therefore, mark the Directive Principles of State Policy as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to remember that Directive Principles include many social and economic goals, such as promotion of welfare, equal pay for equal work, organisation of village panchayats and uniform civil code. Fundamental Rights, on the other hand, emphasise liberties such as equality before law, freedom of speech and protection of life and personal liberty. Since uniform civil code is usually discussed as a directive that the state should strive to achieve, not as a guaranteed court enforceable right, it fits with Directive Principles rather than Fundamental Rights. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The Union Government provisions describe structures like the office of the President, Parliament and the Council of Ministers, and they do not contain Article 44. The State Government provisions concern state executive and state legislatures, but Article 44 is not placed there. Fundamental Rights concern position of individuals vis a vis the state and contain articles like Article 14 and Article 19, but Article 44 is not among them. Hence, these three options do not correspond to the actual placement of Article 44 in the Constitution. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse Directive Principles with Fundamental Rights because both sections talk about important values like equality and social justice. Another mistake is to assume that anything very important must be a Fundamental Right, ignoring the clear text and structure of the document. Some candidates also mix up article numbers and misplace the uniform civil code provision in Part III. To avoid these issues, it is helpful to make a simple chart listing key Directive Principles such as Article 40, Article 44 and Article 48 along with their themes. Final Answer: Article 44 on uniform civil code for the citizens forms part of The Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution of India.

Indian Politics Questions