Single university for all of India — practicality vs. uniformity Statement: Should there be only one university throughout India? Arguments: I. Yes — this is the only way to bring uniformity in educational standards. II. No — this is administratively impossible. III. Yes — this will make degrees comparable for jobs.
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Argument
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
ANone is strong
-
BOnly I and II are strong
-
COnly II and III are strong
-
DOnly I and III are strong
-
EAll are strong
Answer
Correct Answer: Only II and III are strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The proposal is radical: a single university for an entire country. We evaluate whether each argument meaningfully supports or opposes the proposal, keeping in mind feasibility and objectives like uniformity and comparability of degrees.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- I claims “only one way” to uniformity — an absolute claim.
- II highlights administrative impossibility — feasibility concern.
- III suggests degrees would be comparable for jobs — an intended benefit.
Concept / Approach:
- Strong arguments either demonstrate feasibility or articulate a substantive benefit linked to the proposal.
- Absolute claims (“only way”) tend to be weak unless necessity is proven.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I is weak: Uniformity could be achieved through accreditation, standardized curricula, and national assessments; a single university is not the “only way.”II is strong: Administering a single university for a vast nation is practically untenable; logistics, governance, and academic autonomy pose major barriers.III is strong as a pro argument: If one awarding body issues degrees, comparability indeed becomes straightforward for recruiters. While not necessary to achieve comparability, it is a real benefit tied to the proposal, thus a strong supportive point.Verification / Alternative check:
Countries achieve comparability via national frameworks; nonetheless, III correctly states a benefit of the single-university scenario.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I&II or I&III / All / None: Misjudge I’s overstatement or ignore III’s relevance.Common Pitfalls:
Treating a benefit as the only possible method; ignoring feasibility constraints.Final Answer:
Only II and III are strong