Public health policy — ban on aerated drinks in India? Statement: Should consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India? Arguments: I. Yes — it is the only way to reduce disease risk from such products. II. No — each individual should have the.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This item examines whether to ban aerated drinks. Strong arguments hinge on evidence and proportionality. A ban is a severe measure; it typically requires confirmed harm and lack of less-restrictive alternatives. Given Data / Assumptions: I asserts a ban is the “only way” to reduce risk — an absolute claim. II invokes personal freedom of choice. III claims there is no confirmed evidence of adverse effects. IV appeals to supposed bans elsewhere (bandwagon/authority). Concept / Approach: Evidence-based policy requires demonstrable harm; otherwise interventions should be proportionate (labelling, taxes, age limits). Absolutes (“only way”) and appeals to imitation are weak. Step-by-Step Solution: I is weak: Risk can be reduced via information, taxation, and regulation; a ban is not the sole method.II, while important as a liberty claim, is not by itself decisive in public-health contexts where proven harms justify restrictions. As framed in general terms, it is not a strong policy determinant.III is strong: If there is no confirmed evidence of harm, a total ban lacks justification; policy should await or seek robust evidence and consider lighter measures.IV is weak: “Others do it” is not a reason; contexts differ and imitation is not evidence. Verification / Alternative check: Public-health practice typically escalates interventions with the strength of evidence; absence of confirmed harm argues against a blanket ban. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options crediting I or IV rely on absolutes or bandwagon; including II overstates liberty without addressing evidence of harm. Common Pitfalls: Confusing policy proportionality with laissez-faire; evidence remains the key determinant for a ban. Final Answer: Only III is strong

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments