Statement–Argument — Should computers be used in all possible sectors in India? Arguments: I. Yes, computers increase efficiency and accuracy in work. II. No, it would be an injustice to the large human resource that is currently underutilized.

Introduction / Context:
The question tests whether each argument uses relevant, policy-grounded reasoning. Computers have well-documented effects on productivity, error reduction, and auditability. Counter-arguments must also be principle- or evidence-based, not merely emotional appeals.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Policy: Use computers widely across sectors.
• Arg I: Cites efficiency and accuracy gains.
• Arg II: Appeals to justice for underutilized human resources.

Concept / Approach:
A strong “Yes” argument should highlight clear benefits aligned with policy goals (productivity, transparency, speed, cost). A strong “No” should show material downsides (cost, digital divide, cybersecurity, displacement without reskilling) and preferably suggest alternatives (phased adoption). Emotional or vague “injustice” claims are weak unless tied to concrete harm and remediation infeasibility.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Arg I: Efficiency/accuracy are core, measurable benefits in administration, finance, logistics, healthcare, and education. This directly supports the policy intent. Hence, I is strong.2) Arg II: “Injustice” to idle manpower is an emotive assertion. Without showing that computerization causes net welfare loss that cannot be mitigated via retraining or redeployment, it lacks policy weight. Hence, II is weak.

Verification / Alternative check:
One could craft a strong “No” by citing digital exclusion, cost burdens on MSMEs, or data risks, recommending paced rollouts. The given II does not provide such concrete reasoning.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I alone is strong; II is not, so “only II,” “either,” or “both” do not fit.

Common Pitfalls:
Mistaking socio-emotional appeals as sufficient to defeat efficiency-based reforms without proposing viable mitigation.

Final Answer:
If only Argument I is strong.