Statement–Argument — Can the young enjoy old movies? Arguments: I) Yes; many modern movies lack a proper story. II) No; old movies lack the glamour and pace of modern films. Choose the strong argument(s).

Introduction / Context:
The statement concerns enjoyment of old movies by young people. Strong arguments should present general, relevant reasons tied to the statement, not sweeping value judgments about “modern” or “old” cinema.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Enjoyment depends on tastes, story, craft, pacing, genre, and exposure.
• Generalizations about all modern or all old films are risky and often false.
• We look for neutral, principle-based reasons.

Concept / Approach:
Argument I attacks modern films rather than giving a reason why the young can enjoy old films; it is comparative denigration, not a reasoned link. Argument II claims the opposite via different denigration. Both are broad stereotypes, so weak.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
A strong “Yes” could cite universal themes, film education, or restored prints improving accessibility. A strong “No” might reference documented preference data across age groups, still not absolute.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option granting strength to I or II mistakes biased generalizations for analysis.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating taste judgments with logical support; using absolutes (“all/none”).

Final Answer:
if neither I nor II is strong.