Statement–Argument — Should religion be taught in schools? Arguments: I) No; ours is a secular state. II) Yes; teaching religion helps inculcate moral values among children. Choose which argument(s) are strong.

Introduction / Context:
The statement asks whether religion should be taught in schools. In Statement–Argument questions, a “strong” argument is relevant, specific, and logically supports or opposes the statement without relying on sweeping generalizations or vague claims. We evaluate two competing arguments for strength and applicability to the decision at hand.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The state is officially secular (neutral toward religions, not anti-religion).
• Schools may include curricular choices such as ethics, civics, comparative religion, or value education.
• “Teach religion” can be interpreted as teaching about religions (comparative/cultural) or imparting faith-based instruction; the core decision is whether instruction related to religion belongs in schools.

Concept / Approach:
A strong argument should be policy-relevant. Secularism means the state does not favor one religion; it does not automatically ban teaching about religions, especially in a neutral, comparative way. On the other hand, an argument highlighting a concrete educational benefit (moral development) directly addresses outcomes schools care about and is therefore policy-relevant and specific.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
If the syllabus implements a neutral, comparative religion or ethics course, the state remains secular while potential moral/character benefits can accrue. Thus II stands as a policy-grounded reason; I misapplies the secularism principle.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Either I or II” suggests both are strong but mutually exclusive; I is not strong. “Neither” is wrong because II is strong. “Only I” is incorrect given I’s weakness.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing secularism (neutrality) with prohibition; assuming that any mention of religion violates secular norms.

Final Answer:
if only Argument II is strong.