Statement: Metropolises may provide education, jobs, and a good lifestyle, but they score miserably on life’s basic necessities. Assumptions: I. The speaker specifically refers to irregular water and electricity supply. II. A large number of people in metropolitan cities are still deprived of basic necessities. Choose the option that best identifies which assumption(s) is/are implicit.

Introduction / Context:
The claim contrasts advanced amenities (education, jobs, lifestyle) with poor performance on “basic necessities.” We must determine which hidden premise is essential for the claim to make sense.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Metros: high-order services often strong.
• Alleged shortfall: basics for everyday living.

Concept / Approach:
To say metros “score miserably” on basics presupposes that a significant portion of their populations lack those basics. It does not require naming exactly which basics (water, electricity, sanitation, housing, etc.).

Step-by-Step Solution:
Assumption I: Stipulating water/electricity is overly specific. The statement could refer to affordable housing, sanitation, public transport capacity, or healthcare access. Hence I is not necessary.Assumption II: The assertion of metro failure hinges on widespread deprivation of basics; otherwise the statement would be exaggerated or false. Thus II is necessary.

Verification / Alternative check:
If only a negligible number lacked basics, “score miserably” would be unwarranted; thus II must hold.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Both” and “either” wrongly require a specific interpretation (I). “Neither” contradicts the claim’s force; “only I” is too narrow.

Common Pitfalls:
Conflating examples (water/electricity) with the general category of “basic necessities.”

Final Answer:
if only assumption II is implicit.