Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Conclusion

Statement I: A severe cyclonic storm is likely to hit the western coast within the next forty-eight hours. Conclusion: “There was no casualty of human beings and considerably less distress to people living on the western coastline.” Which additional statement (A/B/C) best explains the conclusion?

Difficulty: Easy

Only A: The weather department failed to forecast the severity of the cyclonic storm.
Only B: Most people living on the western coast were shifted to safe shelters with food and water.
Only C: The Government machinery was inadequate to move people out of the coastal area in time.
None of these
A and C only

Correct Answer: Only B: Most people living on the western coast were shifted to safe shelters with food and water.

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:
We have a forecast of a severe cyclone and an outcome of no casualties and reduced distress. We must identify what additional fact best accounts for this favourable outcome.

Given Data / Assumptions:

Lead time: 48 hours.
Outcome: No casualties; less distress.

Concept / Approach:
Effective pre-emptive evacuation to safe, provisioned shelters is the most decisive factor in preventing deaths and reducing hardship during cyclones.

Step-by-Step Solution:

• A: Forecast failure would worsen outcomes, not improve them.• B: Mass evacuation with food and water directly explains reduced harm.• C: Inadequate machinery would impede evacuation; inconsistent with the good outcome.• Therefore, B best explains the conclusion.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They contradict or fail to explain the positive outcome.

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments