Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only B
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a Statement–and–Conclusion question with “supporting Statement II” variants. Statement I describes mass exposure to contaminated flood water owing to transport failure. The Conclusion says the Government directed drug manufacturers to release extra antibiotics. We must decide which candidate Statement II (A/B/C) most logically strengthens the Conclusion.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In such problems, the correct supporting statement should (i) connect exposure to likely infections treatable by antibiotics and (ii) indicate a scale/urgency consistent with releasing additional stocks. Statements that downplay risk or argue against antibiotic use would not support the Conclusion.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
B uniquely provides a medical-risk rationale consistent with the Government’s action. A contradicts the need; C addresses usage practice rather than supply justification.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “antibiotic stewardship” messages (C) with “public health stock readiness.” Both can coexist, but C does not support the supply surge.
Final Answer:
Only B
Discussion & Comments