Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The premise juxtaposes longer life expectancy with rising treatment costs. We test two accusatory conclusions: exclusivity to rich (I) and unethical wealth accumulation (II).
Concept / Approach:
Cost escalation does not logically mean advances serve only the rich; public systems, insurance, and tiered access complicate the picture. Nor does it imply professional misconduct; higher costs may reflect technology, inputs, or systemic inefficiencies. Hence neither conclusion is a necessary inference.
Final Answer:
Neither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments