Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The statement warns that IT disruption is unstoppable and non-adopters risk being “swept away.” We test claims about banks becoming redundant (I) and IT not yet impacting banks (II).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:I overstates to “redundant banks” rather than “banks must adapt”; not entailed. II contradicts the premise—if the tide is unstoppable and threatens to sweep away laggards, the impact is real, not absent.
Final Answer:Neither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments