Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The premise warns that commercialization could push education out of reach for poorer sections. We test two conclusions: historical subsidy (I) and an aphorism about dreams (II).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
I does not follow; commercialization now does not imply that earlier education was subsidised generally. II is a semantic trap; calling something a “dream” signals difficulty, not impossibility in principle.
Final Answer:
Neither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments