Question 1

Genetic variation terminology Some types of phenotypic variation arise from heritable changes in the DNA sequence. What is this type of genetic change called?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Variation in populations arises from genetic and environmental sources. When the DNA sequence itself changes, the resulting heritable differences are called mutations. Recognizing this term is foundational for genetics, evolution, and biotechnology. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks specifically about changes in genetic material (DNA or RNA in some viruses). We are distinguishing processes that change genotype versus those that influence phenotype without altering sequence. Concept / Approach: A mutation is a permanent alteration in the nucleotide sequence. It can be a base substitution, insertion, deletion, repeat expansion, or larger structural change. Mutations provide raw material for evolution and can be spontaneous or induced. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the requirement: direct change in genetic material.Match concept: “mutation” precisely names heritable sequence alterations.Exclude processes that are not sequence changes (e.g., fertilisation combines existing genomes; radiation is an agent that may cause mutations but is not itself the change). Verification / Alternative check: Standard genetics texts define mutation as the heritable change in DNA sequence, distinguishing it from recombination or environmental effects. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fertilisation: mixes parental genomes; does not create new sequence per se. Radiation: a mutagenic cause, not the change itself. Sterilisation: eliminates microorganisms; unrelated to genotype. Polyploidisation during mitosis: changes chromosome number (genome duplication) but is not typically classified as a “mutation” at the sequence level. Common Pitfalls: Confusing mutagenic agents with the mutation event; or conflating recombination/segregation with sequence changes. Final Answer: Mutation

Question 2

Major sources of new genetic change Considering classical genetics, in how many fundamental ways can new genetic variation arise within a lineage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: New genetic variation within populations is classically attributed to two fundamental processes. Knowing these categories helps organize mechanisms from meiosis to horizontal gene transfer under broader headings used in genetics and breeding. Given Data / Assumptions: We seek categories, not an exhaustive list of mechanisms. Mechanistic examples (crossing over, independent assortment, horizontal gene transfer) can be grouped. Concept / Approach: The two fundamental ways are: (1) mutation, which creates novel DNA sequences, and (2) recombination, which reshuffles existing genetic variants into new combinations. Many detailed processes are subtypes of these categories. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify creation of new alleles: mutation (point changes, indels, structural variants).Identify generation of new allele combinations: recombination (meiotic crossing over, independent assortment, gene conversion, and horizontal gene transfer in microbes).Conclude there are two foundational categories. Verification / Alternative check: Population genetics models (e.g., Hardy–Weinberg with mutation and recombination parameters) formalize these as distinct sources of variability. Why Other Options Are Wrong: One way: ignores recombination or mutation respectively. Three/four ways: over-counts by splitting sub-mechanisms that still fall under mutation or recombination. Unlimited ways: not helpful for core classification. Common Pitfalls: Counting selection or migration as “genetic change” mechanisms; they alter frequencies, not the origin of novel sequences or combinations within individuals. Final Answer: Two ways

Question 3

Definition of animal pharming In biotechnology and agriculture, what does the term “animal pharming” most accurately describe?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Animal pharming (biopharming) is a biotechnological approach where animals are engineered to express valuable therapeutic proteins or industrial enzymes, often secreted in accessible fluids such as milk or egg white. Given Data / Assumptions: Focus is on “novel products,” not typical agricultural outputs. Expression is typically driven by tissue-specific promoters (e.g., mammary gland). Concept / Approach: Transgenes encoding human proteins (for example, antithrombin, clotting factors) are integrated into animal genomes to achieve high-yield, scalable bioproduction using existing husbandry and downstream purification methods. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify that pharming implies pharmaceuticals or novel proteins.Recognize the role of transgenes and tissue-specific expression to harvest products efficiently.Select the definition that captures “programming animals to produce novel products.” Verification / Alternative check: Case studies include transgenic goats producing antithrombin in milk and hens producing therapeutic proteins in eggs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Conventional farming: not biotechnology-driven production of novel molecules. Transgenics solely for growth: that is genetic improvement, not pharming per se. Clean rooms without modification: housing conditions do not define pharming. Common Pitfalls: Confusing general transgenic traits (growth, disease resistance) with specific biomanufacturing goals of pharming. Final Answer: Programming animals to produce novel products (e.g., biopharmaceuticals) in milk, eggs, or blood

Question 4

Sources of phenotypic variation Which statement best captures the origin of variation observed among individuals in a population?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Phenotypic traits arise from the interplay of genotype and environment. Quantitative genetics partitions trait variance into genetic and environmental components, with possible interaction between them. Given Data / Assumptions: Traits can be monogenic or polygenic. Environmental factors (nutrition, temperature, exposure) influence expression. Gene–environment interaction can further modulate outcomes. Concept / Approach: Phenotypic variance (Vp) is often modeled as Vp = Vg + Ve + Vgxe + error, where Vg is genetic variance, Ve environmental variance, and Vgxe their interaction. Both sources contribute to observed differences. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that purely genetic explanations ignore environmental modulation (e.g., height depends on nutrition).Recognize that purely environmental explanations ignore heritable differences (e.g., eye color).Select the combined statement acknowledging both genes and environment. Verification / Alternative check: Twin and adoption studies demonstrate contributions from both heredity and environment to many traits. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Genes only: fails for highly plastic traits. Environment only: fails for strongly heritable traits. Random sampling only: sampling affects estimates, not true causation of variation. Common Pitfalls: Over-attributing complex traits to a single cause; ignoring interaction terms and developmental timing. Final Answer: Variation can be caused by both genes and the environment

Question 5

Creating transgenic animals: routes of DNA delivery Which of the following are recognized methods of transfection or genetic material transfer used when making transgenic animals?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Transgenic animal production employs several routes to introduce genetic material. Understanding these options helps in selecting appropriate technology for trait insertion, gene knock-in, or complex genome edits. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider laboratory-validated methods, not just theoretical possibilities. Goal is heritable modification of the germ line or creation of cloned transgenic animals. Concept / Approach: Common routes include (1) nuclear transfer (moving an entire diploid nucleus into an enucleated oocyte), (2) chromosome transfer (microcell-mediated chromosome transfer), and (3) DNA delivery methods (pronuclear microinjection, lentiviral/retroviral vectors, transposons, CRISPR/Cas9 components). Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate nucleus transfer: enables cloning and transgenesis from modified donor cells.Evaluate chromosome transfer: allows movement of large genetic payloads with native regulation.Evaluate DNA transfer: the most widely used approach for classic transgenics and gene editing.Conclude that all listed approaches are valid. Verification / Alternative check: Published protocols document successful animals generated via pronuclear microinjection, SCNT, viral transduction of embryos, and chromosome transfer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each single-method option is incomplete. “None; only selective breeding” ignores modern genetic engineering. Common Pitfalls: Assuming one method suits all species or edits; payload size, mosaicism risk, and regulatory context dictate method choice. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 6

Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) Which statements about MOET in livestock breeding are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: MOET is a reproductive technology used in cattle and other species to amplify the number of offspring from genetically superior animals, accelerating genetic gain in breeding programs. Given Data / Assumptions: Superovulation yields multiple embryos from elite females. Embryos can be flushed, evaluated, and transferred to recipient females. Genetic evaluation relies on performance and progeny data. Concept / Approach: By multiplying embryos from top sires and dams, MOET expands the dataset for genetic evaluations, enables earlier and more accurate selection, and spreads elite genetics quickly across herds. Step-by-Step Solution: Use exogenous hormones to induce multiple ovulations in elite donors.Fertilise (AI or natural) and non-surgically recover embryos.Transfer embryos to synchronized recipients to produce many half-sibs.Leverage the larger progeny groups for robust progeny testing of both sires and dams. Verification / Alternative check: Breeding program simulations and field data show increased selection intensity and shortened generation intervals using MOET. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each single statement (a–c) is correct but incomplete; MOET delivers all these benefits. “None” contradicts well-documented outcomes. Common Pitfalls: Poor synchronization of recipients, inadequate donor response to hormones, and insufficient genetic evaluation frameworks can diminish MOET benefits. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 7

Enhancing embryo numbers for transplantation The success of embryo transfer depends on obtaining many embryos from elite animals. Which intervention is specifically used to achieve this?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Embryo transfer programs rely on superovulation to collect multiple embryos per cycle from genetically superior donors. The hormonal choice and regimen directly influence embryo yield and quality. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal is increased ovulation rate in the donor female. Veterinary reproductive management and synchronization are available. Concept / Approach: FSH is the standard pituitary-derived (or recombinant) hormone administered in decreasing doses over several days to recruit and mature multiple follicles, markedly increasing ovulation numbers relative to natural cycles. Step-by-Step Solution: Select an exogenous hormone: FSH is preferred for multi-follicular recruitment.Administer according to a superovulation protocol aligned with estrous synchronization.Breed and recover embryos by uterine flushing on the appropriate day. Verification / Alternative check: Controlled studies show FSH regimens yield more transferable embryos than reliance on endogenous hormones alone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Exogenous gonadotrophins (generic) are conceptually correct, but the specific, widely used agent is FSH; option (d) names it precisely. Endogenous pulses: insufficient for superovulatory responses. “Both without timing control”: timing is essential; lack of control reduces success. Diet alone cannot induce superovulation. Common Pitfalls: Incorrect dosing schedules, poor synchronization, and ignoring donor variability (breed, parity) can lower embryo yields. Final Answer: FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone) for superovulation protocols

Question 8

Milestone in cloning In which year was Dolly, the first mammal cloned from an adult somatic cell, actually born?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Dolly the sheep is a landmark in biotechnology, demonstrating that a differentiated adult nucleus could be reprogrammed to totipotency via somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Given Data / Assumptions: The public announcement and publication occurred after the birth. We need the actual birth year, not announcement year. Concept / Approach: Differentiate between the date of birth and the date of public disclosure. Dolly was born in mid-1996 and announced in 1997 after verification and peer review. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall SCNT steps: enucleate oocyte, insert donor nucleus, activate embryo, transfer to surrogate.Link to timeline: birth in 1996; Nature paper and media in 1997. Verification / Alternative check: Historical records from the Roslin Institute note Dolly’s birth on 5 July 1996. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1997: announcement year, not birth. 1995, 1998, 2000: do not match documented chronology. Common Pitfalls: Confusing publication year with the actual event date, common in science history questions. Final Answer: 1996

Question 9

Transgenic animals produced by pronuclear DNA microinjection Which of the following animals have been reliably produced using direct DNA microinjection into the fertilized egg (pronuclear microinjection)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Pronuclear microinjection is a classic method for generating transgenic animals by directly injecting DNA into the male pronucleus of a fertilized egg, followed by embryo transfer to a surrogate. Given Data / Assumptions: We are focusing on robust, routine success for a species using this specific technique. Other species may require alternative or less efficient methods. Concept / Approach: Mice were the first and remain the most reliable model for pronuclear microinjection, with high-throughput pipelines in transgenic cores. While pigs and other mammals have been produced by microinjection, success rates and methods often shifted to SCNT, lentiviral vectors, or genome editing platforms due to efficiency issues. In birds like chicken, the opaque egg and unique embryology make pronuclear microinjection into zygotes impractical; viral vectors or primordial germ cell manipulation are preferred. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the species with standardized, routine pronuclear microinjection: mouse.Exclude species where this approach is uncommon or technically unsuitable (e.g., chicken).Note that while pigs can be microinjected, the question asks for established, prototypical use; mice fit best. Verification / Alternative check: Most university transgenic facilities list mouse pronuclear injection as a standard service; avian transgenesis uses different routes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chicken: transgenesis uses viral vectors or germ cell methods, not pronuclear microinjection. Pigs: feasibility exists but less reliable historically; many programs used SCNT or viral vectors. All/None: over- or under-inclusive. Common Pitfalls: Assuming any animal embryo can be handled like a mouse zygote; species-specific embryology dictates technique choice. Final Answer: Mice

Question 10

For achieving rapid genetic progress in livestock breeding programs, how does embryo transfer (ET) compare to artificial insemination (AI) in terms of overall potency as a genetic improvement tool?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Artificial insemination (AI) transformed livestock genetics by spreading elite male germplasm swiftly and cheaply. Embryo transfer (ET) adds the ability to multiply offspring from superior females. This question evaluates whether ET can match AI as a driver of rapid genetic gain in a well-managed breeding program. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal is rapid genetic progress per unit time. ET enables multiple embryos from elite donor females via superovulation or in vitro embryo production. AI disseminates top sires broadly across herds. Selection intensity, generation interval, and accuracy are controlled through recording and evaluation. Concept / Approach: Genetic gain per year is driven by the breeder’s equation: response = (selection intensity * accuracy * genetic standard deviation) / generation interval. AI primarily boosts male-side selection intensity and reduces generation interval. ET increases female-side selection intensity by producing many progeny from the best dams, allowing heavier culling among female candidates without expanding herd size. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize AI’s impact: widespread, low-cost dissemination of elite sires.Recognize ET’s impact: multiplies top females, raising selection intensity on the dam side.Combine both: when properly implemented with recording and genomic selection, ET can contribute genetic gain comparable to AI, acting on the complementary side of the pedigree.Therefore, ET can be as potent as AI in accelerating progress, though economics and logistics determine use-case. Verification / Alternative check: Industries using MOET (multiple ovulation and embryo transfer) or IVF routinely report rapid within-herd gain by concentrating reproduction in nucleus herds, confirming potency comparable to AI when applied strategically. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Will not be as potent” ignores ET’s proven effect on female selection intensity. “ET cannot be used” is false; ET is a mainstream tool. “Superior in every scenario” overgeneralizes; costs and donor response vary. “ET slows progress” contradicts evidence from nucleus-breeding schemes. Common Pitfalls: Assuming AI acts only on males and ET adds little; overlooking that economics, donor fertility, and lab capacity mediate realized gain. Final Answer: Will be as potent a tool as AI (artificial insemination)

Question 11

In producing transgenic fish, by which method are foreign genes most commonly introduced into fertilized eggs or early embryos?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Transgenic fish (e.g., salmon, zebrafish, carp) are made by inserting DNA constructs into early embryos so that the transgene integrates and is transmitted through the germline. Understanding the standard gene delivery route is essential for aquaculture biotechnology and developmental genetics. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal is stable, heritable integration. Manipulation occurs at the one-cell or few-cell stage to target germline precursors. Common research species include zebrafish with transparent embryos suitable for micromanipulation. Concept / Approach: Microinjection directly deposits DNA, RNA, or CRISPR reagents into the yolk or cell of early-stage embryos using microneedles. This provides precise timing and location, good survival in skilled hands, and high efficiency for creating founders that transmit the transgene to progeny. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify mainstream practice in fish transgenesis: embryo microinjection.Recognize that while viral vectors can be used experimentally, they are less common for routine fish germline transgenesis compared with microinjection.Note that nuclear transfer produces clones, not typical transgenic founders by gene insertion.Select microinjection as the best answer. Verification / Alternative check: Zebrafish community standards (Tol2 transposon systems, CRISPR/Cas9) overwhelmingly rely on microinjection at the one-cell stage, validating this choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Viruses: possible but not the dominant approach in fish embryos. Whole-nucleus transfer: cloning, not standard for transgene introduction. “All equally standard”: inaccurate. Electrofusion of adult tissues does not generate germline transmission. Common Pitfalls: Confusing cloning technologies with transgenesis; overestimating viral use in fish compared with mammalian systems. Final Answer: Microinjection into fish eggs or embryos

Question 12

In genetics, which statement best defines a “clone” when referring to an organism produced by cloning techniques?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Cloning in biology refers to producing genetically identical copies of a biological entity. In animals, this typically means making an organism whose nuclear genome matches that of a single donor. The question tests precision in the definition of a clone at the whole-organism level. Given Data / Assumptions: Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) can generate cloned offspring. Clones share nuclear DNA with a single donor; mitochondrial DNA may differ due to oocyte cytoplasm. “Identical to both parents” is biologically impossible in sexual reproduction. Concept / Approach: A cloned organism derives its nuclear genome from one parent (the donor nucleus), not from two gametes. Thus, the correct definition emphasizes complete genetic identity to a single source genome in all cells (allowing for mitochondrial exceptions and somatic mutations post-development). Step-by-Step Solution: Exclude options that invoke “both parents” or nonbiological constructs.Identify the statement that specifies identity to one donor across all cells.Select that definition as the best description of a clone. Verification / Alternative check: Classic examples (e.g., Dolly the sheep) confirm nuclear genetic identity to the donor ewe supplying the somatic nucleus, not to both parents. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Artificial life form: not a scientific definition of cloning. Identical to both parents: contradicts the concept. Breed-specific: cloning is not limited to one species or breed. IVF offspring are not clones; they are genetically unique. Common Pitfalls: Confusing IVF with cloning; ignoring mitochondrial DNA differences while focusing on the nuclear-genome concept. Final Answer: An offspring whose entire cellular genome is identical to that of one parent (the donor)

Question 13

Which option best describes artificial insemination (AI) as performed in animal reproduction programs?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Artificial insemination (AI) is a cornerstone of modern animal breeding, enabling widespread use of elite sires, controlled mating, and biosecurity advantages. Differentiating AI from embryo transfer and in vitro fertilization is essential for correct terminology and practice. Given Data / Assumptions: AI places semen in the female tract without natural copulation. Timing relative to estrus/ovulation is critical for conception. Other assisted reproductive technologies include IVF and embryo transfer (ET). Concept / Approach: AI involves semen collection, processing (extenders, cooling or freezing), and deposition (cervical, intrauterine) using specialized equipment. It is distinct from creating embryos in vitro (IVF) or transferring embryos into recipients (ET). Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the definition that mentions semen collection and deposition in the female tract.Exclude embryo-related procedures (ET) and lab fertilization (IVF).Select the precise AI description. Verification / Alternative check: Industry protocols for cattle, swine, and small ruminants explicitly define AI as timed semen deposition, confirming the choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Embryo transfer and IVF are distinct technologies. “Selective breeding” refers to choosing parents, not the insemination technique. Ovariectomy is unrelated to AI. Common Pitfalls: Conflating AI with ET/IVF; overlooking the critical role of estrus synchronization and semen handling in AI success. Final Answer: Collecting semen and placing it directly into the female reproductive tract at the proper time

Question 14

Within a typical eukaryotic cell, which compartment primarily carries the hereditary information transmitted from one generation to the next?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Hereditary information in eukaryotes is stored mostly in the nuclear genome as DNA packaged into chromosomes. Recognizing the nucleus as the primary repository helps distinguish it from cytoplasmic organelles that have different roles. Given Data / Assumptions: Eukaryotic cells contain a membrane-bound nucleus with chromosomes. Mitochondria and chloroplasts possess small genomes but contribute only a minor fraction of genetic information. The question asks for the primary cellular location for hereditary information. Concept / Approach: Inheritance is driven by chromosomal DNA housed in the nucleus. Chromosomal segregation during mitosis and meiosis ensures transmission of genetic material. While organellar DNA exists, nuclear DNA encodes the vast majority of genes governing development and physiology. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the structure containing chromosomes: the nucleus.Acknowledge minor organellar genomes but note their limited gene content.Select “Nucleus” as the best answer. Verification / Alternative check: Cytogenetic studies localize chromosomes to the nucleus; Mendelian inheritance patterns reflect nuclear chromosomal segregation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Entire cell” is imprecise; genetic control resides mainly in the nucleus. Cytoplasm contains translation machinery, not the primary genome. Chloroplast DNA is plant-specific and limited; animals lack chloroplasts. Golgi apparatus functions in protein processing and trafficking. Common Pitfalls: Overstating the role of organellar genomes; forgetting that most genes are nuclear. Final Answer: Nucleus

Question 15

During cytogenetic preparation, chromosomes are commonly isolated from metaphase cells by applying which osmotic treatment to swell cells and spread chromosomes?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: High-quality metaphase spreads are essential for karyotyping and chromosome banding. A standard step is to expose cells to a hypotonic solution so they swell, facilitating chromosome dispersion after fixation and dropping onto slides. Given Data / Assumptions: Cells are arrested in metaphase (e.g., by colchicine). Goal is to separate and spread condensed chromosomes for microscopy. Hypotonic treatment swells cells by water influx. Concept / Approach: Hypotonic solutions (classically 0.075 M KCl) create an osmotic gradient driving water into cells. This swelling weakens the plasma membrane and disperses chromosomes upon fixation and drop technique. Hypertonic conditions would shrink cells and compact contents, defeating the purpose. Step-by-Step Solution: Arrest cells in metaphase to maximize chromosome condensation.Expose cells to hypotonic solution to swell and loosen membranes.Fix and drop cells to create well-spread metaphase plates. Verification / Alternative check: Protocols from clinical cytogenetics consistently specify hypotonic treatment before fixation, confirming the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Hypertonic lysis compacts cells and is counterproductive. “Either” is incorrect because hypertonic does not give identical results. Isotonic conditions maintain cell volume; spreads are poor. Detergent alone without hypotonic swelling yields clumped metaphases. Common Pitfalls: Insufficient hypotonic time leading to crowded plates; overexposure causing chromosome loss. Final Answer: Hypotonic lysis

Question 16

In enucleation of a mature, unfertilized ovum for cloning or experimental manipulations, which methods can be used to remove or inactivate the nuclear material?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Removal or inactivation of the oocyte nucleus (enucleation) is a key step in somatic cell nuclear transfer and certain developmental biology experiments. The method chosen must eliminate maternal nuclear DNA while preserving cytoplasmic integrity for subsequent reprogramming. Given Data / Assumptions: Target cell is a mature unfertilized ovum (metaphase II). Goal is to remove or inactivate the maternal nucleus (germinal vesicle or metaphase plate). Oocyte viability postprocedure is essential. Concept / Approach: Two classic approaches are used: (1) microsurgical removal of the nucleus using fine glass needles under a microscope; (2) ultraviolet irradiation to inactivate nuclear DNA while preserving cytoplasm. Choice depends on species, equipment, and downstream application. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify acceptable enucleation methods that preserve oocyte cytoplasm.Acknowledge both UV inactivation and microsurgery are documented approaches.Select “both (a) and (b).” Verification / Alternative check: Published SCNT protocols across mammals (e.g., bovine, ovine) and amphibians (Xenopus) describe both strategies, confirming applicability. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Neutralization/homogenization destroys cellular architecture. Antibody-mediated nuclear digestion is not a standard, practical enucleation method. Common Pitfalls: Overexposure to UV damaging cytoplasm; mechanical trauma during microsurgery reducing developmental competence. Final Answer: Both irradiation and microsurgical removal can be used

Question 17

In animal and plant breeding, what is the term for deliberately choosing parent organisms that display desirable traits so those characteristics are more likely in the offspring?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: For centuries, humans have improved crops and livestock by choosing parents with preferred traits—higher yield, disease resistance, temperament—to produce superior progeny. This intentional process has a specific name in genetics and agriculture. Given Data / Assumptions: Breeder controls mating decisions based on phenotypes and records. Goal is to increase the frequency of favorable alleles. Term sought is the standard phrase used in breeding programs. Concept / Approach: Selective breeding (also called artificial selection) contrasts with random mating or natural selection. It encompasses assortative matings, progeny testing, and modern genomic selection, all falling under the umbrella of choosing parents to shape the next generation’s traits. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the established term for intentional choice of parents with desirable traits.Exclude vague or nonstandard labels.Select “Selective breeding.” Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks in animal and plant breeding consistently use the term “selective breeding” or “artificial selection.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Active selection” and “breeding selection” are not standard terms. “Reproductive selection” is nonspecific and uncommon in this context. “Random mating” is the opposite of selection. Common Pitfalls: Confusing selective breeding with assisted reproductive technologies like AI or ET; selection is about parent choice, not mating method. Final Answer: Selective breeding

Question 18

In molecular and cell biology, the term “transfection” specifically refers to what process?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Transfection is a core technique used to study gene function, produce recombinant proteins, and engineer cells. The term is often confused with transcription, translation, or transformation, so precise definition is important for students and practitioners. Given Data / Assumptions: Focus is on eukaryotic cells (mammalian, insect, plant protoplasts). Foreign nucleic acids can be plasmid DNA, siRNA, mRNA, or CRISPR components. Delivery methods include chemical (lipids, calcium phosphate), physical (electroporation), or viral vectors (often termed transduction). Concept / Approach: Transfection means introducing exogenous nucleic acid into eukaryotic cells, either transiently (short-term expression) or stably (genomic integration or episomal maintenance). Do not confuse with transcription (RNA synthesis) or translation (protein synthesis), which are endogenous cellular processes. Step-by-Step Solution: Differentiate among similar-sounding terms.Recognize that transfection is a delivery process of nucleic acids into cells.Select the definition matching that process. Verification / Alternative check: Laboratory manuals define transfection as nucleic acid introduction; “transduction” is specifically viral-mediated delivery, a subset often discussed separately. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Transcription and translation are intracellular biosynthetic processes. Malignant transformation is a biological outcome, not a nucleic-acid delivery method. Cell fusion is a different technique (e.g., to make hybridomas). Common Pitfalls: Using “transformation” (bacterial uptake) interchangeably with “transfection” (eukaryotic); mixing up transduction terminology. Final Answer: Introduction of foreign nucleic acid (DNA/RNA) into a eukaryotic cell

Question 19

Transgenic livestock for biopharmaceuticals: Which therapeutic protein has been produced in the milk of transgenic sheep for replacement therapy in individuals at risk of emphysema?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Transgenic livestock can serve as bioreactors to produce complex human proteins in milk, blood, or eggs. A landmark example is the production of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) in sheep milk for patients with AAT deficiency who are at risk of early-onset emphysema due to unopposed neutrophil elastase activity in the lungs. Given Data / Assumptions: AAT deficiency predisposes to lung tissue destruction. Transgenic expression uses mammary gland–specific promoters to secrete protein into milk. Purified recombinant AAT can be used for augmentation therapy. Concept / Approach: Identify which listed protein is clinically relevant to emphysema risk. AAT is the canonical replacement therapy target; its deficiency underlies emphysema in susceptible individuals. The transgenic sheep platform demonstrated scalable production of functional human AAT in milk, later purified for therapeutic use. Step-by-Step Solution: Map disease (emphysema risk) to protein (AAT).Recall transgenic livestock programs that express human AAT in milk.Choose “Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT).” Verification / Alternative check: Scientific and regulatory literature cite transgenic sheep and goats producing human AAT as classic case studies in pharming. Why Other Options Are Wrong: tPA targets thrombosis, not AAT deficiency. Casein is a milk protein scaffold, not a therapy for emphysema. APP relates to neurobiology, not lung protease balance. Insulin treats diabetes, unrelated to AAT deficiency. Common Pitfalls: Confusing biopharming examples (e.g., antithrombin in goat milk versus AAT in sheep); mixing therapeutic indications. Final Answer: Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT)

Question 20

In animal reproduction and assisted reproductive technology (ART), what does the term “superovulation” specifically refer to?  Choose the option that best describes how the ovulatory response is achieved and regulated.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Superovulation is a cornerstone in animal breeding and assisted reproductive technology (ART). It aims to obtain multiple ovulations in a single estrous cycle, thereby increasing the number of available oocytes or embryos for procedures such as artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, and embryo transfer. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks for a definition-level understanding. External hormonal therapy typically includes exogenous gonadotropins (FSH, eCG) and synchronization agents. Objective: increase the count of mature follicles that ovulate in one cycle. Concept / Approach: Physiologically, only a limited cohort of follicles proceeds to ovulation. Administering exogenous gonadotropins rescues additional follicles from atresia, yielding multiple ovulations. Protocols often combine follicle-stimulating hormone with prostaglandins or progesterone devices to synchronize timing for oocyte recovery or insemination. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the goal: increase the number of ovulations per cycle.Map the mechanism: give exogenous gonadotropins to stimulate folliculogenesis.Clarify “external”: hormones are supplied from outside the animal (injections or implants).Conclude: superovulation = increased ovulatory response by external hormonal therapy. Verification / Alternative check: Breeding manuals and ART protocols consistently define superovulation as multi-ovulation induced by exogenous hormones, typically FSH-based regimens, sometimes with eCG and synchronization aids. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (b) and (c) describe decreased ovulation, the opposite of the aim. (d) “internal hormonal therapy” is vague; endogenous hormones are not what is administered. (e) contradicts clinical practice which clearly changes ovulatory response. Common Pitfalls: Confusing superovulation with superfertility or with just estrus synchronization; ignoring that dosing and timing critically affect embryo quality, not just quantity. Final Answer: Increased ovulatory response by external hormonal therapy

Animal Breeding and Transgenic Animal Questions