For achieving rapid genetic progress in livestock breeding programs, how does embryo transfer (ET) compare to artificial insemination (AI) in terms of overall potency as a genetic improvement tool?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Will be as potent a tool as AI (artificial insemination)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Artificial insemination (AI) transformed livestock genetics by spreading elite male germplasm swiftly and cheaply. Embryo transfer (ET) adds the ability to multiply offspring from superior females. This question evaluates whether ET can match AI as a driver of rapid genetic gain in a well-managed breeding program.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Goal is rapid genetic progress per unit time.
  • ET enables multiple embryos from elite donor females via superovulation or in vitro embryo production.
  • AI disseminates top sires broadly across herds.
  • Selection intensity, generation interval, and accuracy are controlled through recording and evaluation.


Concept / Approach:
Genetic gain per year is driven by the breeder’s equation: response = (selection intensity * accuracy * genetic standard deviation) / generation interval. AI primarily boosts male-side selection intensity and reduces generation interval. ET increases female-side selection intensity by producing many progeny from the best dams, allowing heavier culling among female candidates without expanding herd size.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Recognize AI’s impact: widespread, low-cost dissemination of elite sires.Recognize ET’s impact: multiplies top females, raising selection intensity on the dam side.Combine both: when properly implemented with recording and genomic selection, ET can contribute genetic gain comparable to AI, acting on the complementary side of the pedigree.Therefore, ET can be as potent as AI in accelerating progress, though economics and logistics determine use-case.


Verification / Alternative check:
Industries using MOET (multiple ovulation and embryo transfer) or IVF routinely report rapid within-herd gain by concentrating reproduction in nucleus herds, confirming potency comparable to AI when applied strategically.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • “Will not be as potent” ignores ET’s proven effect on female selection intensity.
  • “ET cannot be used” is false; ET is a mainstream tool.
  • “Superior in every scenario” overgeneralizes; costs and donor response vary.
  • “ET slows progress” contradicts evidence from nucleus-breeding schemes.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming AI acts only on males and ET adds little; overlooking that economics, donor fertility, and lab capacity mediate realized gain.


Final Answer:
Will be as potent a tool as AI (artificial insemination)

More Questions from Animal Breeding and Transgenic Animal

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion