Question 1

Statement & Assumption — “The next meeting of the institute’s board will be held after one year.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. The institute will continue to exist and function after one year. II. The board will be dissolved after one year.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Scheduling a meeting one year ahead presupposes institutional continuity. We must decide which assumptions are necessary.Given Data / Assumptions:A formal plan exists for a board meeting after a year.The board is presumed to remain operative to meet then.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is required: without the institute’s continued functioning, planning a meeting is pointless. Assumption II (board will be dissolved) contradicts the planning act and is not implicit.Step-by-Step Solution:I: Necessary for the feasibility of a meeting.II: Not only unnecessary, but contrary to the statement.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Any option containing II imports a claim that undermines the scheduling itself.Final Answer:if only Assumption I is implicit

Question 2

Statement & Assumption — A recruitment letter to candidates called for a written examination states: “You will have to bear your expenses on travel, etc.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. If this is not clarified, candidates may claim reimburseme…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The organizer pre-empts ambiguity by stating that travel expenses must be borne by candidates. We test which assumptions are necessary.Given Data / Assumptions:A proactive clarification about expenses appears in the call letter.Goal: prevent misunderstandings or future claims.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is necessary: absent such clarity, some candidates might expect reimbursement and later claim it. Assumption II (many organizations reimburse) is plausible context but not required; even if only a few reimburse, clarification still makes sense to avoid claims.Step-by-Step Solution:I: Necessary to justify the explicit disclaimer.II: Not necessary; prevalence across organizations is not essential to this letter’s prudence.Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Either” overgeneralizes; “II only” ignores the direct reason for including the sentence.Final Answer:if only Assumption I is implicit

Question 3

Statement & Assumption — “The function will start at 3:00 PM. You are requested to take your seats before 3:00 PM.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. If an invitee is not seated before 3:00 PM, the function cannot start. II. The function will star…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The invite indicates a precise start time and asks guests to be seated beforehand. We determine which premises must be true for this request to be sensible.Given Data / Assumptions:There is a scheduled start at 3:00 PM.Seating before the start improves orderliness and punctuality.Concept / Approach:Assumption II is implicit: the organizers intend to begin at the scheduled time, hence the request to be seated earlier. Assumption I is not necessary; the event can still begin even if a few invitees are not seated—organizers commonly begin on time regardless.Step-by-Step Solution:II: Necessary—punctual start is the rationale for the instruction.I: Too strong—does not follow that one late invitee blocks the start.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Any option including I imputes an absolute dependency that is not required for the instruction to make sense.Common Pitfalls:Treating a courtesy/operational request as a strict functional precondition.Final Answer:if only Assumption II is implicit

Question 4

Statement & Assumption — A warning displayed in a railway coach reads: “To stop the train pull the chain. Penalty for improper use is ₹500.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. Some passengers misuse the emergency chain. II. In genuine emergencies, …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:A railway notice authorizes passengers to pull the chain to stop a train but warns of a monetary penalty for improper use. We must identify which background beliefs are necessary for such a notice to be sensible.Given Data / Assumptions:An emergency stopping mechanism exists (the chain).A penalty is prescribed for “improper use.”Concept / Approach:A policy statement presupposes both a legitimate purpose (emergency stopping) and a risk of misuse (non-emergency pulls). If either were absent, the dual instruction (permission + penalty) would be incoherent.Step-by-Step Solution:Assumption I: Misuse occurs or is anticipated; hence a penalty is specified.Assumption II: Genuine emergencies can arise in which stopping the train is necessary; hence the chain exists.Verification / Alternative check:Transportation safety protocols commonly combine access to emergency equipment with sanctions against frivolous activation.Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Only I” ignores the safety rationale; “Only II” ignores the misuse deterrent; “Either” and “Neither” fail because the notice depends on both elements.Common Pitfalls:Assuming penalties exist without any history/risk of misuse, or assuming emergency devices exist without contemplated emergencies.Final Answer:if both Assumption I and Assumption II are implicit

Question 5

Statement & Assumption — “The number of people living below the poverty line in urban areas has increased since last year.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. People living in rural areas are not below the poverty line. II. A comparable survey or d…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The claim compares urban poverty levels across two time points (“since last year”). We test which assumptions are required for that comparison to be meaningful.Given Data / Assumptions:Urban poverty is being compared across years.The statement is silent about rural poverty.Concept / Approach:To assert an “increase since last year,” there must be valid prior data for last year (Assumption II). Nothing about rural poverty follows from a statement specifically confined to urban areas, so Assumption I is not required.Step-by-Step Solution:Affirm II: A baseline (last year) is necessary for an increase claim.Reject I: Urban trends do not determine rural status.Verification / Alternative check:Comparatives (increase/decrease) presuppose comparable measurements over time.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Options including I import an unrelated rural inference.Final Answer:if only Assumption II is implicit

Question 6

Statement & Assumption — “Travelling by trains rather than cabs is more convenient and economical in Paris.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. Paris is an expensive city. II. Train services in Paris are reasonably good.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The statement compares modes of transport in Paris and judges trains superior on convenience and cost. We must identify necessary premises.Given Data / Assumptions:A comparison is drawn between trains and cabs.“More convenient and economical” implies acceptable service quality and pricing.Concept / Approach:Assumption II is required: for trains to be more convenient, train services must be reasonably good (frequency, coverage, reliability). Assumption I (Paris is expensive) is not required; trains can be cheaper than cabs regardless of the city’s absolute price level.Step-by-Step Solution:Affirm II: Quality of train services underpins convenience.Reject I: Relative cost advantage does not depend on overall city expense.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Including I adds a nonessential macroeconomic claim.Final Answer:if only Assumption II is implicit

Question 7

Statement & Assumption — A government public-interest notice says: “For a child’s better mental health, admit him/her to school only after completing five years of age.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. A child cannot learn anything before five y…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The advisory prescribes a minimum age for school entry in the interest of mental health. We test which premises are necessary.Given Data / Assumptions:Target behavior: delay formal admission until age 5.Audience: parents choosing school entry timing.Concept / Approach:Assumption II is necessary; if no school admitted children under five, the advisory would be redundant. Assumption I is too strong; the guidance favors later formal schooling, but it does not deny all learning before five (learning can occur at home or preschool).Step-by-Step Solution:Accept II: Policy presumes an existing practice of earlier admissions.Reject I: “Better mental health” rationale does not entail zero learning earlier.Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Either” overreaches; “Neither” ignores the advisory’s practical target.Final Answer:if only Assumption II is implicit

Question 8

Statement & Assumption — “An organization-provided conveyance facility helps employees report to work on time.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. The organization’s conveyance always reaches on time. II. It is otherwise impossible to report on tim…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The statement asserts that a company conveyance “helps” punctuality. We test whether it requires stronger universal claims.Given Data / Assumptions:Company transport can improve timeliness.“Helps” indicates facilitation, not necessity or certainty.Concept / Approach:Assumption I (always on time) is not needed; the benefit can exist even if occasional delays occur. Assumption II (otherwise impossible) is also not needed; employees can be punctual by other means, though the facility assists.Step-by-Step Solution:Reject I: “Helps” ≠ “always guarantees.”Reject II: “Helps” ≠ “only way.”Why Other Options Are Wrong:Any selection including I or II overstates the claim beyond “helps.”Final Answer:if neither Assumption I nor II is implicit

Question 9

Statement & Assumption — Newspaper advertisement: “Learn a foreign language course to get a high-paying job.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. All who learn a foreign language will get a high-paying job. II. Only learning a foreign language can g…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The ad suggests a foreign-language course can help secure lucrative jobs. We test whether extreme generalizations are required.Given Data / Assumptions:Advertising highlights a pathway, not an exclusive or universally sufficient condition.Concept / Approach:Assumption I (“all”) and II (“only”) are over-strong. The ad need only assume that a foreign language can improve prospects for some candidates; it does not claim necessity or guaranteed sufficiency.Step-by-Step Solution:Reject I: Success depends on multiple factors (experience, role, market).Reject II: Many high-paying jobs do not require a foreign language.Final Answer:if neither I nor II is implicit

Question 10

Statement & Assumption — “Make schools free from fear, trauma, and anxiety to turn the Right to Education into a grand national movement.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. A nationwide Right to Education movement is desirable for society. II. Man…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The prescription links emotionally safe schools with energizing a national Right to Education effort. We test which premises are necessary.Given Data / Assumptions:Goal: strengthen the Right to Education through better school climate.Problem: fear/trauma/anxiety impede participation and learning.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is necessary because the recommendation aims at advancing a valuable national goal. Assumption II is necessary because the remedy (reduce fear/anxiety) targets an existing impediment; if stress were not prevalent, the remedy would be misdirected.Step-by-Step Solution:Affirm I: The statement presumes RTE is worth amplifying.Affirm II: The intervention targets a real, present barrier.Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Only I” or “Only II” omit a required pillar of the recommendation’s logic; “Neither/Either” break the linkage.Final Answer:if both Assumption I and Assumption II are implicit

Question 11

Statement & Assumption — A telephone company notifies: “Those who do not pay by the due date will be charged a penalty for each day of default.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. A majority may pay by the due date to avoid the penalty. II. Penalty…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The notice imposes a per-day penalty for late bill payment. We determine which background beliefs this policy presumes.Given Data / Assumptions:Policy goal: improve on-time payments and recover carrying costs.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is implicit: deterrence works only if many customers change behavior to avoid the penalty. Assumption II is also implicit: penalties help compensate for costs of delayed receipts. Assumption III contradicts the need for a notice; if “people generally pay and do not need such notices,” a deterrent notice would be unnecessary.Step-by-Step Solution:Accept I and II; reject III.Final Answer:Both I and II are implicit

Question 12

Statement & Assumption — A planning engineer says: “Traffic is very heavy between 5 PM and 7 PM. We need a flyover in this area.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. Heavy traffic is intended to be maintained. II. Previous planners did little about …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The proposal recommends a flyover as a remedy for peak-hour congestion. We test which premises are necessary.Given Data / Assumptions:Problem: heavy traffic, 5–7 PM.Proposed remedy: build a flyover.Concept / Approach:Only Assumption III is necessary: the remedy must plausibly alleviate congestion. Assumption I is absurd and not required; no one intends to “maintain” heavy traffic. Assumption II is unnecessary; the argument for a flyover does not depend on judging previous planners.Step-by-Step Solution:Affirm III: Links remedy to problem.Reject I and II: Irrelevant or gratuitous claims.Final Answer:Only III is implicit

Question 13

Statement & Assumption — Advertisement: “Use Riya cold cream for a fair complexion.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. People like to use creams to achieve a fairer complexion. II. People are easily fooled by advertisements. III. People respond to…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The cosmetic ad links product use to a desired outcome (fairer complexion). We identify the minimal premises that justify running the ad.Given Data / Assumptions:There is a segment that desires a fairer look and uses topical products.Advertising is worth the spend only if audiences respond.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is implicit: the ad targets demand for complexion enhancement via creams. Assumption III is implicit: the advertiser expects some response. Assumption II is not necessary; believing that “people are easily fooled” is neither required nor prudent—ads can persuade without implying gullibility.Final Answer:Both I and III are implicit

Question 14

Statement & Assumption — A woman prays: “If my intentions are pure and my efforts sincere, by Your grace may I succeed.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. God helps only those who pray to Him. II. God helps only those whose intentions are pure. II…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The supplicant links success to divine grace, purity of intent, and sincerity of effort. We identify what must be believed for such a prayer to be meaningful.Concept / Approach:The act presumes that praying can help (Assumption III). “Only those who pray” (I) or “only those whose intentions are pure” (II) are exclusivity claims not required by the wording; the prayer asks for grace if conditions are met, not that grace is available only in those cases universally.Final Answer:Only III is implicit

Question 15

Statement & Assumption — Travel agency ad: “If you desire the best holiday in Europe, join our exclusive EURO package.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. Many Indians travel to Europe for holidays. II. Other travel agencies in India also organize …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The ad promotes a “best holiday” European package to an Indian audience. We test which premises are necessary.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is necessary: without a sizable or at least viable Indian market traveling to Europe, such an ad would lack purpose. Assumption II (competitors exist) and III (some will still pick others) are plausible but not necessary for the ad to make sense—the firm can advertise even in a monopolistic or competitive setting.Final Answer:Only I is implicit

Question 16

Statement & Assumption — “Who rises from prayer a better person has had his prayer answered.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. Prayer makes a person more humane/better. II. Prayer atones all our misdeeds.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The aphorism equates an inner moral improvement after prayer with an “answered” prayer. We must identify which belief is built in.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is implicit: the yardstick of “answered” is becoming a better person, which presumes prayer can transform character. Assumption II is not implicit; the statement does not claim complete atonement for all misdeeds—only that transformation is the meaningful outcome.Final Answer:if Assumption I is implicit

Question 17

Statement & Assumption — A recruitment letter for written exams states: “You have to bear your expenses on travel, etc.”  Which assumptions are implicit? I. If not clarified, candidates may claim reimbursement of such expenses. II. Many organization…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The organizer explicitly states that travel expenses are to be borne by candidates. We test which premise is required for including such a line.Concept / Approach:Assumption I is necessary: without this clarification, some candidates could assume reimbursement and later claim it. Assumption II is not necessary; even if only a few organizations reimburse, making the policy explicit still prevents misunderstandings.Final Answer:if only Assumption I is implicit

Question 18

Statement–Assumption — Advertisement: “Enroll with us before 30 November to get the advantage of our 20% discount offer.” Assumptions: I. The discount offer is bound to attract good students as well. II. Even students who currently cannot afford the…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This is a Statement–Assumption item based on advertising persuasion. The coaching class promotes a 20% discount valid until 30 November. We must identify which background beliefs must be true for the ad to make sense, not what might incidentally be true.Given Data / Assumptions:An offer: 20% fee discount, time-bound.Goal: increase enrollments before the deadline.No claim is made about student quality or about the discount being sufficient to overcome unaffordability.Concept / Approach:An assumption is implicit if the communication relies on it to achieve its purpose. Ads assume that incentives can nudge some prospective customers, but they need not assume specifics like “good students will certainly be attracted” or “students who cannot afford fees will now join.” Those are stronger and more particular claims than needed.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Test Assumption I: The ad’s success does not depend on attracting good students in particular; any additional enrollments meet the commercial purpose. Thus I is not necessary.2) Test Assumption II: A 20% reduction may still leave fees unaffordable for some; the ad does not rely on converting the financially constrained specifically. Hence II is not necessary.Verification / Alternative check:Marketing promotions generally presume marginal conversion among price-sensitive prospects, without committing to quality strata or affordability thresholds.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I-only or II-only impose unnecessary specifics; “both” compounds the overreach; “either” still overcommits.Common Pitfalls:Reading promotional copy as a guarantee about which exact audience segments will respond.Final Answer:if neither I nor II is implicit

Question 19

Statement–Assumption — “If you want to get a good job, you must have at least basic knowledge of computers.” Assumptions: I. All good jobs involve the use of computers. II. Most companies nowadays have made basic computer knowledge an essential crit…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The statement asserts a necessity claim (“must have basic computer knowledge”) to obtain a good job. We must isolate the minimal premise that makes such a necessity assertion reasonable.Given Data / Assumptions:“Must” indicates a screening criterion across many employers.“Good job” is broad; the statement generalizes across sectors.Concept / Approach:To claim a must-have, the speaker needs to assume that employers commonly include this as an eligibility filter. That maps to Assumption II. By contrast, Assumption I (“all good jobs involve computers”) overstates the case—some roles may remain low-tech yet still be “good.” The necessity in the statement is about hiring criteria, not about job content universally involving computers.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Assumption I is too strong and unnecessary; it converts a hiring norm into a universal job-content requirement.2) Assumption II is exactly the hiring-norm premise that underpins the “must” language.Verification / Alternative check:Recruitment practice often sets base digital-literacy requirements independent of day-to-day computer intensity.Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Neither” denies the plain hiring-norm premise; “both” imports an unnecessary universal claim; “I-only” misreads the statement.Common Pitfalls:Confusing eligibility criteria with job content.Final Answer:if only Assumption II is implicit

Question 20

Statement–Assumption — “The municipal corporation permits fun fairs in the local football ground during the holiday season.” Assumptions: I. Local residents may protest the corporation’s decision. II. Many people may refuse to participate in the fun…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The authority grants permission for an event venue. We must determine whether this act presupposes protest or poor turnout.Given Data / Assumptions:Granting permission is an administrative decision applying rules on land use, safety, and scheduling.No statement is made about public sentiment or participation levels.Concept / Approach:For permission to be rational, the authority needs only legal and logistical compliance, not expectations about protests or crowd sizes. Thus neither a protest prediction nor a participation forecast is required as a premise for the stated action.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Assumption I: Possible protests do not underpin the grant of permission; the decision can stand on regulatory eligibility alone.2) Assumption II: Likewise, the permission does not rely on a belief that many will or will not attend.Verification / Alternative check:Permissions are routinely issued based on compliance even when public turnout is uncertain.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Any option endorsing I or II reads speculative crowd dynamics into an administrative act.Common Pitfalls:Confusing event approval prerequisites with marketing considerations.Final Answer:if neither I nor II is implicit

Statement and Assumption Questions

Questions

Practice smarter