Critical reasoning — admissions eligibility vs selection: If eligibility requires a minimum second-class Master's degree and candidates appearing in the final exam may also apply, decide whether it follows that all such candidates will be selected
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Conclusion
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
AOnly conclusion I follows
-
BOnly conclusion II follows
-
CEither I or II follows
-
DNeither I nor II follows
-
EBoth I and II follow
Answer
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation
Given data
- Statement: Eligibility = at least second-class Master's; appearing candidates (final year) may also apply.
- Conclusions:
- I: All who have yet to get their Master's degree will appear in the selected list.
- II: All who have obtained second-class Master's will appear in the selected list.
Concept/Approach
Eligibility to apply ≠ guarantee of selection. Selection depends on merit, availability, and criteria beyond baseline eligibility.
Step-by-Step logic1) I does not follow: permission to apply while awaiting results does not ensure selection.2) II does not follow: meeting the minimum degree class does not imply automatic selection.
Verification/Alternative
Typical processes: eligible candidates compete; only some are selected based on further assessment.
Common pitfalls
- Conflating 'eligibility' with 'admission granted'.
Final AnswerNeither I nor II follows.