Statement–Courses of Action (industrial competitiveness): Indian electronic component manufacturers entering West European markets face intense competition from Japanese firms; which course(s) of action logically follow—shifting focus to other international markets or upgrading the quality of Indian electronic components to compete effectively?

Given data

• Indian electronic components encounter tough competition from Japanese products in West Europe.
• Courses proposed: (I) Search for other international markets. (II) Improve product quality to compete.

Concept/Approach (address competitiveness, not evade it)
A sound course addresses the stated constraint—product competitiveness—rather than avoiding competitive markets.

Step 1: Course I – Market hopping
Shifting markets sidesteps the problem and may simply relocate the same competitiveness gap.

Step 2: Course II – Quality upgrade
Improving quality (reliability, compliance, certification) directly enhances competitiveness where the constraint is strongest.

Verification/Alternative
Sustainable export success usually depends on quality, standards, and cost—not merely changing destinations.

Common pitfalls
Accepting an evasive strategy (Course I) that does not solve the root capability issue.

Final Answer
Only II follows.