Statement–Courses of Action (school safety and discipline): Despite repeated warnings from the principal, a child was caught secretly exploding firecrackers in school; evaluate which response(s) follow—(I) confiscate all crackers and warn the child not to repeat the act, (II) severely punish the child—focusing on safety, pedagogy, and proportionality.

Given data

• Behaviour: A child lit crackers secretly at school despite prior warnings.
• Course I: Confiscate crackers and issue a strong warning.
• Course II: Severely punish the child.

Concept / Approach
Discipline should first ensure immediate safety and correct behaviour using age-appropriate, educative measures.

Step-by-step evaluation
Step 1: Safety first—confiscation stops the risky act immediately (I).Step 2: A firm warning plus counselling aligns with corrective discipline for minors.Step 3: Severe punishment (II) is disproportionate for a child and may be counterproductive without exploring intent and guidance.

Verification / Alternative check
Schools typically escalate consequences gradually; severe measures are reserved for grave or repeated harm after due process.

Common pitfalls

• Conflating deterrence with harshness; deterrence can be achieved with firm, fair steps.

Final Answer
Only I follows.