Statement–Courses of Action (implementation gap): It is observed that most development plans remain confined to paperwork and do not translate into on-ground execution; which course(s) of action logically follow—(I) instruct officers-in-charge to supervise fieldwork regularly, or (II) curtail the supply of paper to these departments?

Given data

• Plans remain on paper; field execution is lacking.
• Course I: mandate regular field supervision.
• Course II: reduce paper supply.

Concept/Approach (address root cause vs. symbolic action)
Choose the action that increases accountability and implementation rather than a symbolic restriction unrelated to execution.

Step 1: Course I
Directly improves oversight and progress tracking; logically linked to the problem.

Step 2: Course II
Paper rationing does not ensure implementation and may hinder legitimate documentation.

Final Answer
Only I follows.