Analogy — Identify the matching relation: Sin : Crime

Introduction / Context:
“Sin : Crime” contrasts two frameworks for judging acts: sin pertains to moral/religious transgression; crime pertains to legal transgression. The relation is ethical/moral domain vs legal domain addressing human conduct. We need an option echoing this domain contrast.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Sin → moral wrong.
• Crime → legal offense.

Concept / Approach:
Find a pair that stands in the same conceptual mapping of normative systems governing behavior: ethics/morality vs law/legality.

Step-by-Step Solution:
(a) Man : Animal → taxonomy comparison; not normative domains.(b) Home : Court → locations/institutions; not parallel to sin/crime.(c) Morality : Legality → exactly mirrors moral vs legal standards.(d) Jury : Priest → roles within legal/religious systems; not abstract domains themselves.

Verification / Alternative check:
The pair in (c) directly abstracts “sin→morality” and “crime→legality.”

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) Biological classes; (b) places; (d) agents, not normative frameworks.

Common Pitfalls:
Picking (d) because priest and jury “belong” to religion/law, but the stem contrasts concepts not roles.

Final Answer:
Morality : Legality