Analogy — (Recovery Applied) Choose the part-to-whole construction: Letter : Word

Introduction / Context:
(Recovery applied) The provided stem “Latter : Word” appears to be a typographical error; the intended analogy is almost certainly “Letter : Word.” Letters combine to form a word, exhibiting a part → whole (building unit → constructed unit) relation. We must pick an option that mirrors this composition mechanism.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Letters are atomic symbols; words are sequences of letters.
• We seek a pair where the first item aggregates to form the second.

Concept / Approach:
Identify composition vs location vs production: pick the pair that shows smaller units assembling into a larger textual/structural unit.

Step-by-Step Solution:
(a) Homework : School → task vs place; not composition.(b) Club : People → people compose a club (member→group), but the order is inverted (people→club would match; however “club : people” is whole→members).(c) Product : Factory → production site, not component assembly.(d) Page : Book → pages assemble to form a book; mirrors letters→word in structure.

Verification / Alternative check:
Both pairs present “units combine → composite object” in language/media contexts (letters→word; pages→book).

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) Place of activity; (b) reversed order and social-organization semantics; (c) production venue, not components.

Common Pitfalls:
Not correcting the obvious typo; analogy items often require light recovery to preserve solvability.

Final Answer:
Page : Book