Statement:\n“An interview panel may select a student who has neither the desired level of abilities nor the expected values and assumptions.”\n\nConclusions:\nI. Inclusion of experts on an interview panel does not ensure proper selection.\nII. The interview procedure for admission has some limitations.\n\nWhich conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: If both Conclusions I and II follow

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The statement acknowledges a failure mode: the panel may select an unfit candidate. This shows limitations both in panel composition (experts alone do not guarantee outcomes) and in the procedure itself.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Interview is the gate for selection.
  • Despite using a panel (possibly with experts), mis-selection is possible.


Concept / Approach:
From an observed/allowed failure, we infer that the mechanism does not ensure correctness in all cases—hence limitations exist.


Step-by-Step Solution:

• I: If a panel can select an unsuitable candidate, merely having experts is insufficient to ensure correctness—thus I follows.• II: A procedure that can yield unsuitable selections has limitations—thus II follows.


Verification / Alternative check:
Even robust processes have error rates; the statement makes that explicit.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Only I / Only II / Either / Neither: They understate the dual implication of the stated failure.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “experts present” implies infallibility.


Final Answer:
If both Conclusions I and II follow.

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion