Statements:\nI. Education is a process of lighting.\nII. The mind requires light to enlighten the core of its cognitive aspect.\n\nConclusions:\nI. Education is a light which removes the darkness of the mind.\nII. Education is a static process for the mind.\n\nWhich conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Only Conclusion I follows

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The metaphors equate education with lighting and the mind’s need for light to become enlightened. This supports a conceptual conclusion that education dispels mental darkness.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Education ~ lighting.
  • Mind needs light to enlighten cognition.


Concept / Approach:
From the metaphor, conclusion I follows. Nothing suggests education is “static”; in fact, “process of lighting” implies dynamism.


Step-by-Step Solution:

• I: Consistent with the premises—follows.• II: “Static” contradicts “process”—does not follow.


Final Answer:
Only Conclusion I follows.

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion