Statement:\n“The greatest need in India today is not for sophisticated gadgets but for programmes that will provide employment to a large number of people.”\n\nConclusions:\nI. There is an adequate number of sophisticated gadgets in India.\nII. Emphasis is currently being laid on procuring sophisticated gadgets.\n\nWhich conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Introduction / Context:
The statement is a prioritisation claim: employment-generating programmes are more urgently needed than sophisticated gadgets. It does not assert the present stock of gadgets or current procurement emphasis.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Relative need: programmes > gadgets.
• No inventory assessment or policy audit provided.

Concept / Approach:
“X is a greater need than Y” does not imply “we have enough of Y” or “we are currently focusing on Y.”

Step-by-Step Solution:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They impose inventory or policy claims absent from the premise.

Common Pitfalls:
Conflating “relative need” with “current sufficiency” or “current focus.”

Final Answer:
If neither Conclusion I nor II follows.