Statement: “It is almost impossible to survive and prosper in this world without sacrificing ethics and morality.” Conclusions: I. The world appreciates some concepts but may not uphold them. II. The concepts of ethics and morality are not practicable in life. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Introduction / Context:The statement asserts that survival and prosperity almost require sacrificing ethics and morality. This is a strong claim about practicality in the real world.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Ethical conduct is claimed to be incompatible with success in most cases.
• No information on whether “the world appreciates” ethics/morality.

Concept / Approach:From the practicability viewpoint, the statement virtually declares ethics/morality to be impracticable for those seeking survival and prosperity—hence II follows. Appreciation (I) is about attitudes/values of “the world,” which are not discussed.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:“Almost impossible … without sacrificing” equates to “practically not workable” under ordinary conditions.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:They either include I or exclude II despite the clear practical thrust of the premise.

Common Pitfalls:Reading moral commentary (approval/disapproval) into a claim about feasibility.

Final Answer:If only Conclusion II follows.