Statement:\n“Any student who does not behave properly while in the school brings a bad name to himself and also to the school.”\n\nConclusions:\nI. Such students should be removed from the school.\nII. Such students should be corrected (reformed) during their stay in the school.\n\nWhich conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: If neither Conclusion I nor II follows

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The statement is descriptive: misbehavior harms reputation. It does not prescribe remedies.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Premise: Noncompliant behavior causes reputational damage.
  • No indicated policy about removal or corrective action.


Concept / Approach:
Conclusions proposing actions (expulsion or reform) are normative and require policy premises that are not provided.


Step-by-Step Solution:

• I: Removal may be one response, but it is not implied by the statement.• II: Correction is desirable, but likewise not implied.• Hence, neither conclusion necessarily follows.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They infer prescriptive policies from a descriptive harm statement.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming that identifying harm automatically dictates a particular remedy.


Final Answer:
If neither Conclusion I nor II follows.

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion