Statement:\n“Sealed tenders are invited from competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.”\n\nConclusions:\nI. Tenders are invited only from experienced contractors.\nII. It is difficult to find competent tenderers for construction jobs.\n\nWhich conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?

Introduction / Context:
The notice explicitly restricts eligibility to “competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.” This is a stated condition.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Eligibility criterion: prior experience (and competence) is required.
• No information about market difficulty in finding such contractors.

Concept / Approach:
Conclusion I restates the explicit restriction; Conclusion II speculates about availability and difficulty, which the statement does not address.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They either deny I or add II without evidence.

Final Answer:
If only Conclusion I follows.