Statement: “Sealed tenders are invited from competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.” Conclusions: I. Tenders are invited only from experienced contractors. II. It is difficult to find competent tenderers for construction jobs. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Conclusion
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
AIf only Conclusion I follows
-
BIf only Conclusion II follows
-
CIf either Conclusion I or II follows
-
DIf neither Conclusions I nor II follows
-
EIf both Conclusions I and II follow
Answer
Correct Answer: If only Conclusion I follows
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The notice explicitly restricts eligibility to “competent contractors experienced in executing construction jobs.” This is a stated condition.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Eligibility criterion: prior experience (and competence) is required.
- No information about market difficulty in finding such contractors.
Concept / Approach:Conclusion I restates the explicit restriction; Conclusion II speculates about availability and difficulty, which the statement does not address.
Step-by-Step Solution:
• I: Directly supported—only experienced contractors may submit sealed tenders.• II: Not stated; the invitation could be routine even in a deep pool.Why Other Options Are Wrong:They either deny I or add II without evidence.
Final Answer:If only Conclusion I follows.