Question 1

If a country devalues its currency in terms of foreign currencies, what is the usual effect on its exports and imports?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Currency devaluation is an important topic in international economics and Indian economy. When a country devalues its currency under a fixed or managed exchange rate system, the official value of its currency is lowered relative to foreign currencies. This directly affects the prices of exports and imports and is often used as a policy tool to correct trade imbalances. This question tests whether the learner understands the basic directional effect of devaluation on export and import prices. Given Data / Assumptions: - The country devalues its currency, meaning one unit of domestic currency now buys less foreign currency than before. - We must determine what happens to export prices and import prices in foreign and domestic terms. - We assume a standard framework where devaluation is significant enough to influence trade flows and prices. Concept / Approach: When a currency is devalued, each unit of domestic currency is worth less in foreign currency. For foreign buyers, the price of the country's exports becomes lower in their own currency because they now need fewer units of foreign currency to buy the same amount of domestic goods. For domestic consumers, the price of imported goods becomes higher in domestic currency because more units of domestic currency are needed to buy a given amount of foreign goods. Thus devaluation makes exports cheaper and imports costlier, which can help reduce trade deficits. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider exports. Suppose one domestic good earlier cost 1 unit of domestic currency, which equalled some amount of foreign currency. After devaluation, 1 unit of domestic currency equals less foreign currency, so foreign buyers find the domestic good cheaper in their own currency. Step 2: Therefore, from the perspective of foreign buyers, exports from the devaluing country become cheaper and more competitive in international markets. Step 3: Now consider imports. If an imported good costs a fixed amount in foreign currency, after devaluation each unit of domestic currency buys less foreign currency. Step 4: This means domestic consumers must spend more units of domestic currency to obtain the same amount of foreign currency to buy the imported good, making imports costlier. Step 5: Hence, the general effect of devaluation is that exports become cheaper and imports become costlier. Verification / Alternative check: A simple numerical example can be used. Suppose before devaluation, 1 domestic unit equals 1 foreign unit. An export priced at 10 domestic units costs 10 foreign units. After devaluation, if 1 domestic unit equals only 0.5 foreign units, the same export priced at 10 domestic units now costs 5 foreign units, clearly cheaper for foreign buyers. Conversely, an import priced at 10 foreign units would earlier cost 10 domestic units but now costs 20 domestic units, making imports more expensive domestically. This confirms the conceptual reasoning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Exports become costlier and imports become cheaper is wrong because it describes the opposite of devaluation. That situation resembles a revaluation or appreciation of the domestic currency. Exports value is equivalent to imports value is wrong because devaluation does not automatically equalise export and import values; it only changes relative prices. No effect on exports and imports is wrong because devaluation is specifically used to influence trade flows by changing prices in international markets. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes get confused between devaluation and appreciation or revaluation. A helpful memory tip is to remember that when a currency is devalued, it becomes “weaker” relative to foreign currencies, so domestic goods look cheaper abroad and foreign goods look expensive at home. Another pitfall is ignoring time lags and assuming immediate large changes in trade volumes, but exam questions usually ask only about the direction of price changes, not the exact magnitude or timing of trade responses. Final Answer: When a country devalues its currency, exports become cheaper and imports become costlier in general.

Question 2

Sectoral distribution of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) index is primarily used to measure which aspect of a country's progress?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The sectoral distribution of GDP tells us how much different sectors such as agriculture, industry and services contribute to the overall economic output of a country. This distribution is a widely used indicator in development economics, because it shows structural changes in the economy over time. As countries develop, the share of agriculture typically falls while the share of industry and services rises. This question asks which aspect of progress is mainly captured by the sectoral distribution of GDP. Given Data / Assumptions: - The focus is on sectoral distribution of GDP, that is the share of primary, secondary and tertiary sectors in total output. - We must identify whether it measures agriculture development, economic development, social development or socioeconomic development. - We assume standard use of the GDP concept in economic analysis. Concept / Approach: GDP itself is a measure of economic output and growth. When we break GDP into sectors, we can see the structure of production and how it changes with development. A higher share of industry and services and a relatively lower share of agriculture is generally associated with higher levels of economic development. Therefore the sectoral distribution of GDP is primarily an indicator of economic development and structural transformation, though it also has implications for social and socioeconomic aspects. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that GDP is an economic measure, expressing the value of all final goods and services produced in an economy in a given period. Step 2: Sectoral distribution of GDP refers to how this total is divided among agriculture, industry and services. Step 3: As economies develop, the share of agriculture usually declines while industry and then services become dominant. This pattern is a classic indicator of economic development. Step 4: Although agriculture development is related, looking only at the share of agriculture does not capture the whole picture; the distribution across all sectors reflects broader economic development. Step 5: Social development involves factors like education, health and gender equality, which are not directly measured by GDP shares, so it is not the primary focus here. Step 6: Therefore, the best description is that sectoral distribution of GDP measures the economic development of a country. Verification / Alternative check: Consider two hypothetical countries. Country A has 60% of GDP from agriculture, 20% from industry and 20% from services. Country B has 10% from agriculture, 30% from industry and 60% from services. Most economists would say Country B is more economically developed due to its larger industrial and service sectors. This judgement is based directly on sectoral distribution of GDP, confirming that the index is a tool for examining economic development rather than only agriculture or purely social progress. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Agriculture development of a country is wrong because sectoral distribution covers all sectors, not just agriculture, and development is not judged solely by the agriculture share. Social development of a country is wrong because although economic structure influences society, social development is typically measured by indicators like literacy, life expectancy and health, not directly by GDP sector shares. Socioeconomic development of a country is broader and includes both economic and social dimensions, whereas sectoral distribution of GDP focuses more specifically on the economic production structure, so economic development is the more precise answer in this context. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up economic and social indicators, assuming that any index related to GDP must also fully capture social development. While there is a relationship, they are not the same. Another confusion arises when learners focus only on agriculture, thinking that increasing its share always means development, but in most development patterns the opposite is true. Remembering the typical shift from primary to secondary and tertiary sectors as income rises can help in correctly interpreting sectoral GDP data. Final Answer: Sectoral distribution of the GDP index is primarily used to measure the economic development of a country.

Question 3

If hiring an extra worker increases a factory's output from 1000 to 1200 units per day, but to sell this higher output the factory must reduce the price of its product from Rs 25 to Rs 24 per unit, what is the marginal revenue product (MRP) of this …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Marginal revenue product (MRP) is a key concept in the theory of factor pricing. It measures the additional revenue earned by a firm when it employs one more unit of a factor such as labour, taking into account any change in output and any necessary change in price to sell that extra output. This question provides data on both the change in quantity produced and the price adjustment required to sell the new output, testing whether the learner can compute the MRP correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: - Initial output: 1000 units per day. - New output after hiring extra worker: 1200 units per day. - Initial price per unit: Rs 25. - New price needed to sell 1200 units: Rs 24 per unit. - Other conditions are assumed unchanged, and all units are sold at the same price on each side of the change. Concept / Approach: Marginal revenue product is calculated as the change in total revenue resulting from employing one more unit of the factor. Total revenue (TR) is price times quantity. Therefore, we first compute TR before hiring the additional worker, then compute TR after hiring the worker and adjusting the price, and finally take the difference between the two totals. That difference is the MRP of the additional worker. It is important to use the new price for all units after the change, since the firm must lower the price on the entire output to sell the larger quantity. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Calculate initial total revenue. Before hiring the extra worker, output is 1000 units and price is Rs 25 per unit. Initial TR = 1000 * 25 = Rs 25000. Step 2: Calculate new total revenue. After hiring the extra worker, output is 1200 units and price is reduced to Rs 24 per unit. New TR = 1200 * 24 = Rs 28800. Step 3: Compute the change in total revenue, which equals the marginal revenue product of the new worker. MRP = new TR - initial TR = 28800 - 25000 = Rs 3800. Step 4: Therefore, the marginal revenue product of the extra worker is Rs 3800. Verification / Alternative check: To double check, note that the worker adds 200 units of output (from 1000 to 1200), but the price for all units must drop by Rs 1 (from 25 to 24). The gain in revenue from the extra 200 units at Rs 24 each is 200 * 24 = Rs 4800. However, the loss from reducing the price on the original 1000 units is 1000 * 1 = Rs 1000. Net change in revenue = gain 4800 minus loss 1000 = Rs 3800. This matches the previous calculation, confirming that the MRP is correctly computed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rs 200 is wrong because it considers only the direct output gain without correctly incorporating the price reduction effect on all units, or it may come from a miscalculation of net revenue change. Rs 4000 is wrong because it might result from multiplying the extra 200 units by the old price of Rs 20 or some similar error, ignoring the necessary price reduction. Rs 100 is wrong because it does not relate meaningfully to the change in total revenue due to the extra worker when both quantity and price are changing. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to calculate MRP as marginal physical product times the original price only, without considering that the firm must lower the price for all units to sell the increased quantity. This leads to overestimation. Another common error is to subtract only partial revenue changes instead of calculating total revenue before and after. To avoid these problems, always remember that MRP is defined as the change in total revenue due to employing one more unit of the factor, and that both quantity and price effects must be included when the demand curve is downward sloping. Final Answer: The marginal revenue product of the last worker is Rs 3800 per day.

Question 4

Which economic law states that when coins of unequal intrinsic value are in circulation together, the bad or debased money tends to drive the good money out of circulation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to monetary economics and economic history. It asks about a famous principle that describes what happens when two forms of money, one of higher intrinsic value and one of lower intrinsic value, circulate together at the same face value. The principle explains why people tend to hoard good money and spend bad money. Recognising the name of this law is important for many general knowledge and Indian economy examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: - Coins of unequal intrinsic value circulate side by side at the same face value. - People tend to use one type of coin and hoard or remove the other. - We must identify the name of the law that states that bad money drives good money out of circulation. - Options include Wagner's law, Grimm's law, Gresham's law and Keynes' law. Concept / Approach: The law that states “bad money drives out good” is known as Gresham's law, named after Sir Thomas Gresham. The idea is that if two forms of commodity money are accepted as having the same face value, people will tend to spend the coins that are overvalued or debased (bad money) and hoard or melt down the higher value coins (good money). Over time, the good money disappears from circulation, leaving mostly bad money. Other named laws in the options relate to different topics such as public expenditure or phonetics, so they can be eliminated. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall which law is popularly summarised by the phrase “bad money drives out good money”. Step 2: Identify Gresham's law as the monetary principle that states that when both good and bad money are legal tender at the same face value, people will hoard good money and spend bad money. Step 3: Check the other options. Wagner's law refers to the growth of public expenditure with economic development, Grimm's law is related to historical sound changes in linguistics, and Keynes is associated with macroeconomic theories, not specifically this money phenomenon. Step 4: Therefore, the correct answer is Gresham's law. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a country where both gold coins and debased alloy coins circulate but both are accepted as equal in terms of face value. Rational economic agents will choose to pay with the alloy coins and keep the gold coins at home, possibly melting them down or selling them later for their metal value. Over time, only the cheaper alloy coins will be seen in the market. This behaviour accurately illustrates Gresham's law, confirming that this is the correct choice among the options provided. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Wagner's law is wrong because it deals with the tendency of government expenditure to increase relative to national income as an economy grows, not with currency circulation. Grimm's law is wrong because it relates to a pattern of consonant changes in the Germanic languages and has nothing to do with economics. Keynes' law is not the standard name of a monetary principle; Keynes is linked with macroeconomic ideas such as the importance of aggregate demand, not with the specific statement that bad money drives out good. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes mix up different named laws and associate Gresham with fiscal policy or Wagner with money, which is incorrect. Memorising the key phrase “bad money drives out good” alongside Gresham's name is a useful memory aid. Another pitfall is to think that the law implies bad money always replaces good under any system, but it specifically applies to situations where both types of money are legal tender at the same face value. Understanding this condition improves conceptual clarity beyond rote memorisation. Final Answer: The law that states that bad money tends to drive good money out of circulation is Gresham's law.

Question 5

Which of the following is an example of a tertiary sector activity in the structure of an economy?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the study of Indian economy and development economics, activities are often grouped into three sectors: primary, secondary and tertiary. Primary activities involve extraction of natural resources, secondary activities involve processing and manufacturing, and tertiary activities involve services. Understanding which activities fall into each category is essential for interpreting sectoral contributions to GDP and employment. This question asks you to identify which activity represents the tertiary sector. Given Data / Assumptions: - Options include farming, manufacturing, dairying and trading. - We need to pick the activity that belongs to the tertiary or service sector. - We assume standard textbook definitions of the three sectors. Concept / Approach: Primary sector activities are concerned with the extraction or production of natural resources, such as farming, fishing, mining and dairying. Secondary sector activities transform these primary goods into manufactured products, such as in factories and workshops. Tertiary sector activities provide services that support production and consumption, such as trading, transport, banking, education and health care. Therefore, we simply classify each option by these definitions and select the one that clearly belongs to the service sector. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Classify farming. Farming involves growing crops and is a classic primary sector activity based on agriculture. Step 2: Classify manufacturing. Manufacturing processes raw materials into finished or semi finished goods and is a typical secondary sector activity. Step 3: Classify dairying. Dairying involves production of milk and related products from animals, and is closely related to agriculture, so it belongs to the primary sector. Step 4: Classify trading. Trading involves buying and selling goods and providing distribution services. It does not produce physical goods but provides a service, so it belongs to the tertiary sector. Step 5: Therefore, trading is the correct example of a tertiary sector activity. Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to remember that tertiary sector is also called the service sector. Activities like wholesale trade, retail trade, transport and financial services clearly fall into this category. Trading, by definition, refers to buying and selling goods and thus is a service that connects producers and consumers. None of the other options perform this type of service as their primary function, so trading is confirmed as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Farming is wrong because it is a primary sector agricultural activity based on direct use of land and natural resources. Manufacturing is wrong because it forms part of the secondary or industrial sector, where physical transformation of inputs into finished goods takes place. Dairying is wrong because it is associated with livestock and agriculture, and is treated as part of the primary sector along with other animal husbandry activities. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse secondary and tertiary activities when manufacturing firms also provide services like after sales support. However, the core manufacturing process is still secondary, while the service part is tertiary. Another confusion arises when people think of dairying as a processed product because milk is packaged, but the core dairying activity of producing milk is primary. Memorising a few typical examples for each sector, such as farming for primary, steel production for secondary and trading for tertiary, can help prevent such errors in competitive exams. Final Answer: The activity that belongs to the tertiary sector is trading.

Question 6

If the price of an article decreases from Rs 25 to Rs 20 and the quantity demanded increases from Q1 units to 1500 units, and the point elasticity of demand is -1.25, what is the initial quantity demanded Q1?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is another application of point elasticity of demand, but this time we are asked to find the initial quantity demanded rather than the initial price. When the price changes and elasticity is known, we can use the definition of point elasticity to work backwards and find the missing value. Such problems reinforce the practical use of elasticity formulas and algebraic manipulation in economic analysis and exam questions. Given Data / Assumptions: - Initial price P1 is 25 rupees. - New price P2 is 20 rupees. - Initial quantity Q1 is unknown. - New quantity Q2 is 1500 units. - Point elasticity of demand e is -1.25. - We use the point elasticity formula around the initial point (P1, Q1). Concept / Approach: Point elasticity of demand can be written as e = (ΔQ / ΔP) * (P / Q), where P and Q refer to the initial price and quantity. Here ΔQ equals Q2 - Q1 and ΔP equals P2 - P1. We know e, P1, P2 and Q2 and must solve for Q1. Handling signs correctly is crucial because ΔP is negative when price falls and elasticity for a normal demand curve is negative. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the change in price: ΔP = P2 - P1 = 20 - 25 = -5. Step 2: Let ΔQ = Q2 - Q1 = 1500 - Q1. This will be positive if quantity rises. Step 3: Use the point elasticity formula: e = (ΔQ / ΔP) * (P1 / Q1). Step 4: Substitute known values: -1.25 = (1500 - Q1) / (-5) * (25 / Q1). Step 5: Simplify step by step. First, (1500 - Q1) / (-5) equals (Q1 - 1500) / 5. Step 6: The expression becomes -1.25 = (Q1 - 1500) / 5 * (25 / Q1). Step 7: Combine the constants: (25 / 5) = 5, so -1.25 = 5 * (Q1 - 1500) / Q1. Step 8: Multiply both sides by Q1 to clear the denominator: -1.25 * Q1 = 5 * (Q1 - 1500). Step 9: Expand the right side: -1.25 Q1 = 5Q1 - 7500. Step 10: Bring Q1 terms to one side: -1.25 Q1 - 5Q1 = -7500, so -6.25 Q1 = -7500. Step 11: Divide both sides by -6.25: Q1 = 7500 / 6.25 = 1200 units. Step 12: Thus the initial quantity demanded Q1 is 1200 units. Verification / Alternative check: Check the result by recalculating elasticity with Q1 = 1200. Then ΔQ = 1500 - 1200 = 300 and ΔP = -5. Use e = (ΔQ / ΔP) * (P1 / Q1) = (300 / -5) * (25 / 1200) = (-60) * (25 / 1200). Since 25 / 1200 equals 1 / 48, we have e = -60 * 1 / 48 = -60 / 48 = -1.25. This matches the given elasticity, confirming that 1200 units is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 900 units, 1800 units and 2000 units all produce different elasticity values if substituted back into the formula. None of them yield -1.25, so they cannot be the correct initial quantity demanded. Common Pitfalls: Students often mismanage the signs of ΔP and ΔQ or use the midpoint elasticity formula instead of the point elasticity expression. Algebraic mistakes when solving for Q1 are also frequent, such as not correctly distributing constants across parentheses. To avoid these issues, write the formula carefully, keep track of negative signs and always verify the answer by substituting it back into the original equation, as done above. Final Answer: The initial quantity demanded Q1 is 1200 units.

Question 7

In the year 2015 the nominal rate of interest in a country was 6% and the inflation rate was 1.5%. What was the approximate real rate of interest in 2015?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding the difference between nominal and real interest rates is fundamental in macroeconomics and personal finance. The nominal interest rate is the stated rate on a loan or deposit, while the real interest rate adjusts this for inflation to show the true increase in purchasing power. This question tests whether the learner can compute the approximate real rate of interest when given the nominal rate and the inflation rate for a given year. Given Data / Assumptions: - Nominal interest rate in 2015: 6%. - Inflation rate in 2015: 1.5%. - We are asked to find the real interest rate for that year. - We use the simple approximation formula for the real interest rate. Concept / Approach: The approximate relationship between nominal rate (i), real rate (r) and inflation rate (π) is given by r ≈ i - π, where all rates are expressed as percentages. This approximation is widely used in exam questions because it is simple and accurate enough for moderate inflation rates. For higher precision, one could use the exact Fisher equation r = (1 + i) / (1 + π) - 1, but for small rates the difference between the two formulas is minimal. Here, the approximation is sufficient and easy to apply. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the nominal interest rate (i) which is 6%. Step 2: Identify the inflation rate (π) which is 1.5%. Step 3: Use the approximate formula for the real rate: r ≈ i - π. Step 4: Substitute the values: r ≈ 6% - 1.5% = 4.5%. Step 5: Therefore, the approximate real interest rate in 2015 is 4.5%. Verification / Alternative check: To check using the exact Fisher equation, convert the percentages to decimal form. Nominal i = 0.06 and inflation π = 0.015. Then r = (1 + 0.06) / (1 + 0.015) - 1 = 1.06 / 1.015 - 1. The ratio 1.06 / 1.015 is approximately 1.0443, so r ≈ 0.0443 or 4.43%. This is very close to 4.5%, confirming that the simple difference method gives a good approximation and that 4.5% is the correct option among those provided. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 7.50% is wrong because real interest cannot be higher than nominal interest when inflation is positive; subtracting inflation must reduce the rate, not increase it. 4% is wrong because it underestimates the subtraction and would correspond to an inflation rate of 2% instead of the actual 1.5%. 0.25% is wrong because it comes nowhere near the difference between 6% and 1.5%, and would imply an unrealistic inflation situation for the given nominal rate. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to add the inflation rate instead of subtracting it, which leads to an inflated real rate. Another error occurs when students forget that inflation erodes purchasing power, so the real rate must be smaller than the nominal rate as long as inflation is positive. To avoid confusion, always remember the approximate identity r ≈ nominal rate minus inflation rate, and double check whether the resulting real rate is logically less than the nominal rate when prices are rising. Final Answer: The approximate real interest rate in 2015 was 4.50%.

Question 8

The goods that people tend to consume more of when their prices rise, due to special preferences or status effects, are known as what kind of goods?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In standard microeconomic theory, the law of demand states that as the price of a good rises, the quantity demanded falls, other things being equal. However, certain rare types of goods seem to violate this general rule, and understanding them is a popular exam topic. This question asks about the goods for which people consume more when prices rise. Two important concepts here are Giffen goods and Veblen goods. The question expects familiarity with the traditional terminology used in many textbooks and competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - The focus is on goods for which quantity demanded increases as their price rises. - Options include essential goods, capital goods, Veblen goods and Giffen goods. - We assume the context is standard exam oriented microeconomics where Giffen goods are emphasised as a classic exception to the law of demand. Concept / Approach: Giffen goods are inferior goods for which the negative income effect of a price rise is so strong that it outweighs the substitution effect, leading to higher quantity demanded as price increases. They are often described in the context of staple foods for very poor households. Veblen goods, by contrast, are luxury items where higher prices may increase demand because they confer status, but many introductory courses and exams still emphasise Giffen goods as the textbook exception to the law of demand. Among the options, the standard name widely used in exam questions for goods bought in larger quantities when prices rise is Giffen goods. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that for most normal and inferior goods, a price rise leads to lower quantity demanded due to the law of demand. Step 2: Identify the special case where a price rise leads to an increase in quantity demanded. In older exam traditions, this is associated with Giffen goods. Step 3: Giffen goods are described as strongly inferior goods where the income effect of a price change dominates, such that when price rises, poor consumers are forced to buy even more of the cheaper staple and cut down on better quality alternatives. Step 4: Essential goods and capital goods do not generally violate the law of demand in this specific way, and are not defined by this behaviour. Step 5: Veblen goods are luxury or status goods where a higher price may signal higher status, but many exam questions about the basic exception to the law of demand focus on Giffen goods as the standard answer. Step 6: Therefore, within the conventional exam framework, the correct answer is Giffen goods. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a very poor household that consumes mainly a cheap staple, such as a low quality grain, and a small amount of more expensive food. When the price of the staple rises, real income falls sharply. The household cannot afford as much of the better food, so it reduces that consumption and shifts even more towards the staple, even though its price is higher. This leads to an increase in demand for the staple as price rises, which is the classic Giffen behaviour. This scenario is exactly what textbooks use to define Giffen goods, confirming that the term applies to such goods. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Essential goods are wrong as the answer because although people may still buy them despite price rises, they normally follow a downward sloping demand curve in formal theory. Capital goods are wrong because these are machines and equipment used in production; their demand is derived from the demand for final goods and not defined by increasing consumption when price rises. Veblen goods describe luxury status goods for which a higher price can increase desirability, but in many basic microeconomics and Indian economy multiple choice questions, the classic exception to the law of demand is labelled as Giffen goods, especially when no explicit mention of prestige or status is made. Common Pitfalls: A modern conceptual pitfall is to confuse Veblen goods and Giffen goods because both can show an upward sloping demand curve. The difference is that Giffen goods are inferior necessities where income effects dominate, while Veblen goods are luxury items where higher price itself creates desirability due to prestige. Since exam questions often use the simpler older terminology, students should be careful to choose Giffen goods when the context is poor consumers and staples, or when the question simply states that people buy more as price rises without mentioning status. Reading textbooks and previous years' papers helps to see how exam setters use the term. Final Answer: The goods that people are traditionally said to consume more of when their prices rise are called Giffen goods.

Question 9

When government expenditure on the current account exceeds government revenue on the current account, this situation is described as which type of budgeting?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Public budgeting terminology is a regular feature of Indian economy and public finance questions. Governments often compare their expenditure and revenue on the current account to determine whether they are running a deficit or surplus. When spending exceeds revenue, the government must borrow or draw down reserves to cover the gap. This situation is given a specific name, and recognising it helps students understand fiscal policy and budget documents. Given Data / Assumptions: - Government expenditure on the current account is greater than government revenue on the current account. - We need to identify what kind of budgeting this situation represents. - Options include deficit budgeting, zero based budgeting, performance based budgeting and surplus budgeting. - We assume standard definitions used in public finance. Concept / Approach: When expenditure exceeds revenue in a budget, the result is a deficit that must be financed by borrowing or other means. A budget that plans or results in such a gap is commonly called a deficit budget or deficit budgeting. Surplus budgeting is the opposite case where revenue exceeds expenditure. Zero based budgeting and performance based budgeting refer to methods of preparing the budget, not to the balance between expenditure and revenue. Therefore, we must pick the term that directly describes a situation of excess expenditure over revenue. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the core information: government expenditure on current account is greater than government revenue on current account. Step 2: This means the government has to cover the difference by borrowing or using past savings; this gap is called a budget deficit. Step 3: A budget in which such a deficit exists is known as a deficit budget, and the practice is termed deficit budgeting. Step 4: Compare with other terms. Zero based budgeting is a technique where every expense must be justified from zero each year, not a statement about surplus or deficit. Step 5: Performance based budgeting links allocations to performance indicators and outcomes, again not directly describing a deficit or surplus situation. Step 6: Surplus budgeting requires revenue to be greater than expenditure, which is the opposite of what is given. Step 7: Therefore, the correct term is deficit budgeting. Verification / Alternative check: Budget documents commonly classify the situation where expenditure exceeds revenue as involving a revenue deficit, fiscal deficit or primary deficit, depending on which components are considered. All of these involve deficit budgeting because the government must raise funds from borrowing or asset sales. This aligns perfectly with the plain language meaning of the term deficit budgeting, confirming that it is the appropriate label among the options given. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Zero based budgeting is wrong because it describes a method of budgeting where each item starts from a base of zero and must be justified afresh, regardless of past allocations. It does not imply anything directly about a deficit or surplus. Performance based budgeting is wrong because it refers to linking expenditure to performance metrics and outcomes, not to the balance between revenue and expenditure. Surplus budgeting is wrong because it indicates that government revenue exceeds expenditure, which is the opposite of the situation described in the question. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the type of budget balance (deficit or surplus) with the method of preparing the budget (zero based or performance based). It is important to separate the question “how big is the gap between spending and revenue” from the question “how are budget items proposed and justified.” Another mistake is to assume that any modern sounding term such as performance based budgeting must be correct, without checking whether it addresses the relationship between expenditure and revenue. Looking carefully at the keywords “exceeds” and “revenue” helps guide you towards the idea of a deficit. Final Answer: When government expenditure on the current account exceeds government revenue on the current account, the situation is called deficit budgeting.

Question 10

In the context of the Indian economy, disguised unemployment is mainly related to which sector of employment?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Disguised unemployment is a very important concept in Indian economy and development studies. It is often used to explain why many people in villages appear to be employed on farms, yet the overall productivity remains low. This question checks whether the learner can correctly link disguised unemployment with the sector where it is most commonly observed in India, and understand why this type of hidden unemployment persists in that sector. Given Data / Assumptions: • The question is about the Indian economy. • The focus is on disguised unemployment, also called hidden unemployment. • We are asked to identify the main sector to which it is related. • Options cover different sectors such as agriculture, industry and services. Concept / Approach: Disguised unemployment exists when more workers are employed than actually required to produce a given level of output. If some workers are withdrawn from that work, total output does not fall. Their marginal productivity is almost zero. In India this situation is very common in traditional rural agriculture where families work on small landholdings and share the work, even though fewer workers could produce the same crop. Therefore, the key approach is to recall in which sector the marginal productivity of extra workers is almost zero and where surplus labour is typically discussed in textbooks on Indian economy. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definition of disguised unemployment as a situation where too many workers are engaged in a task without increasing output. Step 2: Think about the Indian context, especially rural areas where family farms often employ many family members on the same plot of land. Step 3: Note that even if some of these workers shifted to non farm work, agricultural output would largely remain the same, which means marginal productivity of some workers is almost zero. Step 4: Compare this with organised manufacturing, public administration or modern service sectors where each worker usually has a clearer role and marginal productivity is more visible. Step 5: Conclude that disguised unemployment is mainly associated with the agricultural sector in rural India. Verification / Alternative check: A simple way to verify is to remember that most standard Indian Economy textbooks specifically mention disguised unemployment in the chapter on agriculture and rural development. They usually give examples of a large joint family cultivating a small piece of land. If two or three members shift to other jobs, farm output does not fall. This classic example confirms that agriculture in rural areas is the sector where disguised unemployment is most prominent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Large scale organised manufacturing sector usually employs a planned number of workers based on machines and production schedules, so surplus labour is less common. Information technology and business process outsourcing services generally hire workers with specific skills and measurable outputs, so hidden unemployment is not a standard feature. Public administration and defence services may sometimes appear overstaffed, but the textbook concept of disguised unemployment in India is firmly linked to rural agriculture, not these sectors. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse disguised unemployment with open unemployment and give answers related to rural or urban areas in general, instead of identifying the specific sector. Another mistake is to think of modern sectors like information technology simply because they hear news about layoffs or bench periods. The exam point of view, especially in Indian economy multiple choice questions, consistently associates disguised unemployment with the agricultural sector, not with modern industry or services. Final Answer: The sector with which disguised unemployment is mainly associated in India is the Agricultural sector in rural areas.

Question 11

Under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime in India, GST is levied on which one of the following products?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Goods and Services Tax, commonly called GST, is the major indirect tax system in India. It subsumed many central and state level taxes, but some important products were kept outside GST for policy and revenue reasons. Competitive exams often ask which products are covered by GST and which remain under the old tax structure. This question checks whether the learner can correctly recall that tobacco is under GST, while many petroleum products and electricity are outside the GST net for now. Given Data / Assumptions: • GST is already implemented as the main indirect tax in India. • The options include petroleum crude, aviation turbine fuel, tobacco and electricity. • We must identify the product on which GST is actually levied. • Policy status is considered as per the standard exam pattern on GST. Concept / Approach: When GST was introduced, five petroleum products, namely crude oil, petrol, diesel, aviation turbine fuel and natural gas were kept outside GST for the time being. States continue to levy separate taxes on these products. Electricity is also outside GST and remains under state tariffs. Tobacco and tobacco products, on the other hand, were brought under GST, and in addition to GST, a special excise duty or compensation cess can also be levied on them. Therefore the correct approach is to recall which products remain outside GST and select the one that is clearly inside the GST framework. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Remember that petroleum sector items like crude oil and fuels were excluded from GST at the time of its introduction. Step 2: Note that aviation turbine fuel is explicitly mentioned among the petroleum products that remain outside GST in the standard description. Step 3: Recall that electricity is treated separately and is not under GST, as states control electricity duty and tariffs. Step 4: Recall that tobacco and tobacco products were covered by GST, and they bear GST plus additional duties or cess due to health concerns and revenue motives. Step 5: Therefore identify tobacco and tobacco products as the only correct option where GST is levied. Verification / Alternative check: Another quick check is to think about how GST compensation cess is collected. One of the major items on which compensation cess is levied is tobacco and tobacco products. This clearly means tobacco is under GST, otherwise the cess mechanism linked to GST would not apply. You may also recall that petrol and diesel prices are still discussed in terms of state value added tax plus central excise, showing that they are outside GST. This cross check confirms our choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Petroleum crude remains outside GST, with separate central and state levies still applicable, so GST is not charged on it directly. Aviation turbine fuel is also not under GST currently, and instead attracts state level taxes and central levies, which is why aviation companies often demand its inclusion under GST. Electricity supplied by state utilities is not subject to GST and continues to be taxed through electricity duty and related state level charges, so it cannot be the correct answer. Common Pitfalls: A frequent confusion is created by news about possible future inclusion of petroleum products under GST, which may lead learners to mark options like crude oil or aviation turbine fuel. Another mistake is to assume that since GST is called a goods and services tax, it automatically applies to all goods including electricity without exceptions. The exam however expects the test taker to know the specific list of items kept outside GST at the time of implementation and to remember that tobacco is firmly inside the GST structure. Final Answer: Under the current GST regime in India, GST is levied on Tobacco and tobacco products.

Question 12

A manufacturer faces a price elasticity of demand of minus 2 for its product. If it lowers the price by 5 per cent, by what percentage will the quantity sold increase?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Price elasticity of demand is a central concept in microeconomics. It measures how sensitive the quantity demanded of a good is to changes in its price. Many quantitative questions in exams use the elasticity formula to link percentage change in quantity demanded with percentage change in price. This question focuses on applying the basic elasticity formula when elasticity and percentage change in price are given, and asks for the percentage change in quantity sold under a specific scenario. Given Data / Assumptions: • Price elasticity of demand (Ed) for the product is minus 2. • The manufacturer reduces price by 5 per cent. • We assume the elasticity remains constant in this range of price change. • We must find the resulting percentage increase in quantity sold. Concept / Approach: The basic formula for price elasticity of demand is Ed = percentage change in quantity demanded divided by percentage change in price. The sign is usually negative because quantity demanded moves in the opposite direction to price. Rearranging this formula allows us to compute the unknown percentage change in quantity when elasticity and price change are known. Here the given elasticity is minus 2, and the price change is a reduction of 5 per cent, so the percentage change in quantity demanded will be equal to Ed multiplied by the percentage change in price. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the elasticity formula: Ed = (% change in quantity demanded) / (% change in price). Step 2: Substitute the known values: Ed = minus 2 and % change in price = minus 5 (because price falls). Step 3: Let % change in quantity demanded be represented by x. Then we have minus 2 = x / minus 5. Step 4: Multiply both sides by minus 5 to solve for x. This gives x = minus 2 * minus 5. Step 5: Compute the product. Minus 2 * minus 5 equals positive 10, so x = plus 10 per cent. Step 6: Therefore quantity sold will increase by 10 per cent when price is reduced by 5 per cent with elasticity equal to minus 2. Verification / Alternative check: A quick mental check is to ignore the minus sign and think in absolute values. An elasticity of 2 means quantity responds twice as much as the price change in percentage terms. If the price change is 5 per cent, the quantity change must be 10 per cent. Since the price falls, quantity must rise, so we add the positive sign and get a 10 per cent increase. This reasoning confirms the formal calculation and avoids possible sign errors. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 3 per cent is lower than the price change and would correspond to elasticity in absolute value less than one, which contradicts the given elasticity of 2. 2.5 per cent would suggest that the quantity response is only half of the price change, which again conflicts with the idea of a highly elastic demand with magnitude 2. 7 per cent is not equal to twice the given price change and does not match the direct proportional relationship implied by the formula Ed = 2 in absolute value. Common Pitfalls: Many learners forget the negative sign in elasticity and become confused about whether quantity increases or decreases. Others mix up the formula and divide the price change by elasticity instead of multiplying. Another common mistake is to write 5 multiplied by 2 as 15 by accident in haste. Careful attention to signs and a calm check that a price fall should lead to a quantity increase when the elasticity magnitude is greater than one will avoid these errors in similar questions. Final Answer: If the manufacturer lowers the price by 5 per cent with a price elasticity of demand of minus 2, the quantity sold will increase by 10 per cent.

Question 13

In banking and monetary policy, if the Reserve Bank of India decreases the cash reserve ratio (CRR), what will happen to the volume of credit creation by commercial banks?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The cash reserve ratio, commonly called CRR, is one of the key monetary policy instruments used by the Reserve Bank of India. It specifies the percentage of deposits that commercial banks must keep as cash reserves with the central bank. Changes in CRR directly affect the amount of funds that banks can use to give loans and therefore influence the overall credit creation process in the economy. This question tests basic understanding of how a change in CRR affects bank lending and money supply. Given Data / Assumptions: • The Reserve Bank of India decides to reduce the cash reserve ratio. • Banks are required to keep a smaller percentage of their deposits as reserves. • No other policy tool is changed at the same moment. • We focus on the direction of change in credit creation, not on exact numerical values. Concept / Approach: Under the fractional reserve banking system, banks keep a fraction of deposits as required reserves and lend out the rest. The money multiplier concept explains how an initial deposit can lead to a multiple expansion of credit. The smaller the reserve ratio, the larger the potential money multiplier, because banks are free to lend out a larger share of each unit of deposits. Therefore, when CRR is reduced, banks experience an increase in loanable funds, which allows them to expand credit and create more deposits in the form of loans. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that CRR is the fraction of deposits that banks must hold as reserves with the central bank. Step 2: When CRR decreases, each bank is required to keep a smaller proportion of its deposits idle as reserves. Step 3: This immediately frees additional funds for banks, because a larger share of deposits can now be used for lending and investment. Step 4: When banks lend more, new deposits are created in the system, which further increases the base for additional credit in subsequent rounds. Step 5: Therefore, the overall capacity of the banking system to create credit increases when CRR is reduced. Verification / Alternative check: A simple numerical illustration can provide reassurance. Suppose the CRR is 10 per cent. Then for every 100 rupees of deposits, banks must keep 10 as reserves and can lend 90. If the CRR is reduced to 5 per cent, banks must keep only 5 as reserves and can lend 95. Over many rounds of deposit creation and lending, this higher share of lendable funds magnifies total credit in the system. This direct relation between lower CRR and higher lending confirms the answer that credit creation will increase, not decrease. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The statement that credit creation will decrease is the opposite of what actually happens, and would correspond to a situation where CRR is increased, not reduced. The claim that credit creation will remain unchanged ignores the core role of CRR and contradicts the fundamental money multiplier logic of fractional reserve banking. The idea that credit creation will first decrease and then increase has no standard theoretical support in basic textbook models and is not how CRR is understood in policy discussions. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse CRR with the statutory liquidity ratio or with policy rates such as the repo rate. They may also reverse the direction of effect, thinking that a reduction in CRR means less security and therefore less lending, which is not how the mechanism operates. Keeping a clear link in mind between lower required reserves, more lendable funds and higher credit creation helps avoid these errors in exam questions and practical discussions about monetary policy. Final Answer: When the Reserve Bank of India reduces the cash reserve ratio, the capacity of commercial banks to lend increases, so credit creation will increase.

Question 14

In a bakery, hiring one more baker increases output from 1250 breads to 1400 breads per day, but the price per bread falls from Rs 15 to Rs 14 to sell the higher output. What is the marginal revenue product of this last baker?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Marginal revenue product is an important concept in the theory of factor pricing. It measures the additional revenue that a firm earns by hiring one more unit of a factor of production, such as an extra worker. In imperfect competition or when price changes with output, we must calculate the change in total revenue rather than simply multiplying the marginal product by a fixed price. This question uses a simple bakery example to test whether the learner can compute marginal revenue product correctly when both quantity and price change. Given Data / Assumptions: • Initial daily output of the bakery is 1250 breads. • The initial price per bread is Rs 15. • After hiring one more baker, daily output rises to 1400 breads. • To sell the extra output, the price per bread must fall to Rs 14. • We must calculate marginal revenue product of the last baker as the change in total revenue. Concept / Approach: Marginal revenue product of labour is defined as the change in total revenue divided by the change in the number of workers. When we hire exactly one additional worker, marginal revenue product is simply the new total revenue minus the old total revenue. In this case, price falls as output increases, so we cannot multiply marginal physical product by the original price. Instead we compute total revenue before hiring the extra worker and total revenue after hiring the extra worker, and then find the difference between these two values. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute initial total revenue. Initial output is 1250 breads and initial price is Rs 15, so initial total revenue is 1250 * 15. Step 2: Calculate 1250 * 15. This gives Rs 18750. Step 3: Compute new total revenue after hiring the additional baker. New output is 1400 breads and the new price is Rs 14, so new total revenue is 1400 * 14. Step 4: Calculate 1400 * 14. This gives Rs 19600. Step 5: Marginal revenue product of the last baker is new total revenue minus old total revenue, which is 19600 minus 18750. Step 6: Subtracting 18750 from 19600 gives Rs 850, so the marginal revenue product of the additional baker is Rs 850. Verification / Alternative check: To check the calculation, re do the multiplication mentally or with a simple breakdown. For 1250 * 15, think of 1000 * 15 equals 15000 and 250 * 15 equals 3750, so total is 18750. For 1400 * 14, think of 1000 * 14 equals 14000 and 400 * 14 equals 5600, so total is 19600. The difference between 19600 and 18750 is clearly 850. Since we added exactly one worker, this difference is exactly the marginal revenue product of that worker, which confirms our result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rs 150 is only the change in price per unit times a round number and has no direct relation to the change in total revenue calculated using the data given. Rs 1960 would correspond to wrongly using marginal physical product of 1400 minus 1250, which is 150, multiplied by the new price 14, without considering that the lower price applies to all units, not just the extra ones. Rs 1875 is the initial total revenue, not the change in revenue, so it cannot represent the marginal revenue product of the additional baker. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to compute marginal revenue product by multiplying the marginal physical product by the original price, which is only correct under perfect competition when price does not change with output. Another error is to forget that the lower price now applies to all units sold, so the impact on existing output must be included. Exam questions are often designed to test whether the learner understands this subtle difference between marginal revenue product under constant price and under changing price conditions. Final Answer: The marginal revenue product of the last baker, based on the change in total revenue, is Rs 850 per day.

Question 15

In a perfectly competitive market, if a firm can increase its profits by expanding its output, what must be true about the relationship between price and marginal cost at the current output level?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Profit maximisation is a central idea in microeconomics. Under perfect competition, a firm is a price taker, which means it accepts the market price and chooses only the output level. The standard condition for profit maximisation in this setting is that the firm produces the quantity at which price equals marginal cost, provided that price is at least as large as average variable cost. This question checks understanding of what happens when the firm is not yet at that point and can still increase profit by raising output. Given Data / Assumptions: • The market structure is perfect competition, so the firm is a price taker. • The firm can increase profit by increasing its output from the current level. • All other conditions such as technology and factor prices are unchanged. • We must infer the relation between price and marginal cost at the current output. Concept / Approach: In perfect competition, the demand curve faced by an individual firm is perfectly elastic at the market price. The firm maximises profit by producing output where marginal cost equals price, as long as price covers average variable cost. If at the current output price is greater than marginal cost, then producing and selling one more unit adds more to revenue than it adds to cost, so profit rises when output increases. If price is less than marginal cost, producing more units would reduce profit. Therefore, the sign of price minus marginal cost tells us whether the firm should expand or contract output. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the profit maximisation rule in perfect competition: produce where price equals marginal cost. Step 2: At any output level where price is greater than marginal cost, the extra revenue from one more unit exceeds the extra cost of producing that unit. Step 3: In that situation, adding one more unit increases total profit, so the firm has an incentive to increase output. Step 4: The question states that the firm can increase profit by expanding output, which implies that it is not yet at the point where price equals marginal cost. Step 5: Therefore, at the current level of output, price must exceed marginal cost and not the other way round. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a simple numerical example. Suppose the market price is Rs 10 per unit. If the marginal cost of the last unit produced is Rs 7, then producing one more unit yields Rs 10 in revenue while adding only Rs 7 in cost. Profit rises by Rs 3. This clearly means the firm should produce more until marginal cost rises and becomes equal to price. If, instead, marginal cost were Rs 12 while price is Rs 10, extra production would reduce profit. This alternative check supports the condition that, when profit can be increased by raising output, price must be greater than marginal cost at the current production level. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Price exceeding average total cost implies that the firm is earning positive economic profit, but it does not by itself tell us whether producing more will raise or lower profit, because profit maximisation depends on marginal cost, not average total cost. Average variable cost exceeding average total cost is not even possible, because average total cost equals average fixed cost plus average variable cost, so average total cost is always at least as large as average variable cost. Fixed costs being zero has no direct relation to whether producing extra units will raise or lower profit in the short run, because the decision to expand output is guided by marginal cost and price, not by the level of fixed cost. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to confuse average concepts with marginal concepts. Learners sometimes think that as long as price is above average total cost, it is always optimal to expand output, ignoring marginal cost. Another pitfall is to forget that the firm in perfect competition is a price taker and cannot raise price to improve profit; it can only adjust quantity. Focusing on the simple rule that profit increases when price is greater than marginal cost and decreases when marginal cost is greater than price helps avoid confusion. Final Answer: If a perfectly competitive firm can increase its profit by expanding output, then at the current output level price exceeds marginal cost.

Question 16

In a printing press, seven workers each receive Rs 450 per day. A proposed eighth worker demands Rs 500 per day, and if hired, all eight workers must be paid Rs 500 per day. What is the marginal resource cost of hiring the eighth worker?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Marginal resource cost, also known as marginal factor cost, is a concept used in the theory of labour and factor markets. It measures the additional cost to a firm when it hires one more unit of a factor, such as an extra worker. In a labour market with a uniform wage for all similar workers, hiring another worker sometimes requires the firm to raise the wage for existing workers as well. This question checks whether the learner can correctly compute marginal resource cost by accounting for the increase in the total wage bill, not just the wage of the new worker. Given Data / Assumptions: • Initially, there are seven workers in the printing press. • Each of these seven workers is paid Rs 450 per day. • An eighth worker demands a wage of Rs 500 per day. • If the eighth worker is hired, all eight workers must be paid Rs 500 per day. • We must find the marginal resource cost of the eighth worker. Concept / Approach: Marginal resource cost is defined as the change in total cost of employing the factor when one more unit is hired. In this case, the factor is labour. Because the hiring of the eighth worker forces a wage increase for all workers, we must compare the total wage bill before and after the new worker is hired and take the difference. It is not enough to look only at the wage of the eighth worker itself. The additional cost to the firm includes the higher wage paid to the original seven workers as well. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the initial total wage bill. There are seven workers, each paid Rs 450, so initial wage bill equals 7 * 450. Step 2: Calculate 7 * 450 which equals Rs 3150 per day. Step 3: After hiring the eighth worker, the wage for each worker becomes Rs 500 per day, and the total number of workers becomes eight. Step 4: Compute the new total wage bill as 8 * 500, which equals Rs 4000 per day. Step 5: Marginal resource cost is the change in the total wage bill, so subtract the original wage bill from the new one: 4000 minus 3150. Step 6: This difference is Rs 850, so the marginal resource cost of the eighth worker is Rs 850 per day. Verification / Alternative check: To check the result, consider an alternative breakdown. The eighth worker brings in a direct wage cost of Rs 500. In addition, each of the seven existing workers gets a wage rise of Rs 50 per day, since their wage goes from Rs 450 to Rs 500. The extra cost from wage increases to existing workers is 7 * 50, which is Rs 350. Adding the direct cost of the new worker, 500 plus 350 equals Rs 850. This matches the earlier calculation based on total wage bills, confirming that the marginal resource cost is Rs 850. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rs 50 is only the increase in wage per worker, not the total increase in the wage bill for the firm due to the collective wage change. Rs 400 would be the difference between 8 * 450 and 8 * 500 or some other incorrect partial calculation, not the change between the correct total wage bills before and after hiring. Rs 100 has no clear relation to either the wage change or the total wage bills and therefore cannot represent marginal resource cost in this situation. Common Pitfalls: A major pitfall is to assume that marginal resource cost is always equal to the wage of the last worker hired. That is true only when the firm can hire additional workers at a constant wage without affecting the wage paid to existing workers. In markets where wages must rise to attract new workers, the marginal resource cost exceeds the wage rate. Understanding this difference is important, especially when studying monopsony power or upward sloping labour supply curves faced by a firm. Final Answer: The marginal resource cost of hiring the eighth worker in this printing press is Rs 850 per day.

Question 17

In the long run, an increase of 1 per cent per year in the growth rate of the money supply will increase the rate of inflation in the economy by how much?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Macroeconomics often uses the quantity theory of money and the concept of long run neutrality of money to analyse the relationship between money supply growth and inflation. According to this view, in the long run, changes in the growth rate of the money supply mainly affect the rate of inflation rather than real variables like output. This question tests whether the learner can recall the basic one to one relationship between money growth and inflation in the long run when velocity and real output growth are held constant. Given Data / Assumptions: • The money supply growth rate increases by 1 per cent per year. • We consider long run behaviour, not short run fluctuations. • Velocity of money and real output growth are assumed to be constant over time. • We are asked how much inflation will increase in the long run. Concept / Approach: The quantity theory of money uses the identity M * V = P * Y, where M is money supply, V is velocity of circulation, P is the price level and Y is real output. Taking growth rates and assuming that velocity growth is zero and real output growth is constant, the theory implies that inflation, which is the growth rate of P, is approximately equal to the growth rate of the money supply minus the growth rate of real output. In the simplest case where real output growth is unchanged, a higher money growth rate translates directly into a higher inflation rate of the same magnitude. Therefore, a one percentage point increase in the money supply growth rate raises inflation by one percentage point in the long run. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the basic quantity equation M * V = P * Y. Step 2: Express this in terms of growth rates. The growth rate of M plus the growth rate of V equals the growth rate of P plus the growth rate of Y. Step 3: Assume velocity growth is zero, so the growth rate of V is zero, and keep real output growth constant at its existing value. Step 4: Under these assumptions, any permanent increase in the growth rate of M must show up as an equal increase in the growth rate of P, which is the inflation rate. Step 5: Therefore, if the growth rate of the money supply rises by 1 per cent per year, the long run inflation rate will also rise by 1 per cent per year. Verification / Alternative check: An intuitive way to confirm this result is to think of an economy where output grows at a steady rate and money is only a tool for making transactions. If the amount of money in circulation grows faster every year while the quantity of goods and services grows at the same pace as before, there is more money chasing the same stream of real output. Over time, this extra money will simply raise prices rather than output, so the rate at which prices rise, that is inflation, increases by the same amount as the extra money growth. Many macroeconomic textbooks summarise this with the simple statement that in the long run inflation is a monetary phenomenon controlled by money supply growth. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Zero per cent would imply that an increase in money growth has no effect on inflation even in the long run, which contradicts the quantity theory and most empirical evidence in the long run horizon. Zero point five per cent would suggest less than one to one transmission from money growth to inflation, which is not what basic long run models imply when velocity and real output growth are fixed. More than one per cent would indicate that inflation responds more than proportionately to money growth in the long run, which is possible in complex models but is not the standard textbook result that exam questions usually expect for this type of question. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse short run and long run effects of money supply changes. In the short run, changes in money supply can affect real output and interest rates, so the relationship between money growth and inflation is not simple. Another pitfall is to mix up real and nominal interest rates and assume that changes in money supply affect only interest rates. The key is to remember that in the long run with stable velocity and real output growth, a higher trend growth rate of money primarily produces a higher trend inflation rate of the same magnitude. Final Answer: In the long run, an increase of 1 per cent per year in the growth rate of the money supply will raise the inflation rate by one per cent per year.

Question 18

If the quantity demanded of good X increases from 2300 units to 2700 units when the price of related good Y rises from Rs 45 to Rs 55, what is the arc cross elasticity of demand between X and Y?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Cross elasticity of demand measures how the quantity demanded of one good responds to changes in the price of another related good. It is positive for substitute goods and negative for complementary goods. The arc method of elasticity uses average values of price and quantity to compute elasticity over a finite change, rather than at a point. This question provides data on how the quantity of good X changes when the price of good Y changes and asks for the arc cross elasticity of demand between the two goods. Given Data / Assumptions: • Initial quantity of good X demanded, Q1, is 2300 units. • New quantity of good X demanded, Q2, is 2700 units. • Initial price of good Y, P1, is Rs 45. • New price of good Y, P2, is Rs 55. • We must compute arc cross elasticity of demand using the arc elasticity formula. Concept / Approach: Arc cross elasticity of demand is calculated using the formula: Exy = percentage change in quantity of X divided by percentage change in price of Y, where the percentage changes are computed using average values. That is, percentage change in quantity equals change in quantity divided by average quantity, and percentage change in price equals change in price divided by average price. The ratio of these two percentages gives the arc cross elasticity. A positive result indicates that X and Y are substitutes, while a negative result indicates that they are complements. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the change in quantity of good X. Change in quantity equals Q2 minus Q1, so 2700 minus 2300 equals 400 units. Step 2: Compute the average quantity of X. Average quantity equals (Q1 plus Q2) divided by 2, which is (2300 plus 2700) divided by 2. This sum is 5000 and the average is 2500. Step 3: Compute the change in price of good Y. Change in price equals P2 minus P1, so 55 minus 45 equals 10 rupees. Step 4: Compute the average price of Y. Average price equals (P1 plus P2) divided by 2, which is (45 plus 55) divided by 2. This sum is 100 and the average is 50. Step 5: Calculate the percentage change in quantity using the arc formula. That is change in quantity divided by average quantity, so 400 divided by 2500, which equals 0.16. Step 6: Calculate the percentage change in price using the arc formula. That is change in price divided by average price, so 10 divided by 50, which equals 0.2. Step 7: Compute arc cross elasticity by dividing 0.16 by 0.2. This equals 0.8. Step 8: Therefore the arc cross elasticity of demand between X and Y equals 0.8, which is positive and indicates substitute goods. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, note that both numerator and denominator represent fractional changes. A 400 unit change out of an average of 2500 is 16 per cent, while a 10 rupee change out of an average of 50 is 20 per cent. Dividing 16 per cent by 20 per cent again gives 0.8. The sign is positive because both price of Y and quantity of X move in the same direction, confirming that the goods are substitutes and that the computed elasticity value makes sense. Why Other Options Are Wrong: An elasticity of 4 would require the percentage change in quantity to be much larger than the percentage change in price, which is not supported by the given data. 1.25 would correspond to 25 per cent change in quantity for a 20 per cent change in price, but we only have a 16 per cent change in quantity, so this option does not match the calculations. Zero point two five would arise if we mistakenly inverted the ratio or made an error in computing either the change in quantity or change in price and their averages. It understates the responsiveness implied by the numbers. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes use the initial quantity and price instead of averages, which gives a slightly different value and is not the arc elasticity as defined in many exam syllabi. Another common mistake is to divide the percentage change in price by the percentage change in quantity, reversing the formula. Confusing own price elasticity with cross elasticity is also common. Focusing on the systematic steps of calculating changes, averages and then the ratio helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: The arc cross elasticity of demand between goods X and Y is 0.8, indicating that they are substitute goods with moderate responsiveness.

Question 19

Which of the following is not an assumption of a perfectly competitive market in standard microeconomic theory?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Perfect competition is a benchmark market structure used in microeconomics to analyse how prices and output are determined when many firms compete under ideal conditions. The model rests on a number of strong assumptions, such as large numbers of buyers and sellers, homogeneous products and perfect information. Exam questions often test whether the learner can identify which statements truly belong to the set of assumptions and which one is not a part of the standard perfect competition model. Given Data / Assumptions: • We are given four statements about a market and asked to identify which one is not an assumption of perfect competition. • The statements refer to the number of buyers and sellers, cost conditions, product homogeneity and information. • The question is conceptual and does not involve numerical calculation. • We must recall the textbook definition of perfect competition. Concept / Approach: A perfectly competitive market is usually described by several key assumptions: very large numbers of buyers and sellers, such that no individual can influence the price; homogeneous products so that consumers view all units as perfect substitutes; free entry and exit; and perfect information for both buyers and sellers. These assumptions ensure that the market price is determined by aggregate supply and demand, and that each firm is a price taker. The model does not, however, require that average total cost must always decline as output increases. Cost curves typically have a U shape, with a region of falling average cost followed by rising average cost, so a statement about continual decrease in average total cost is not part of the assumptions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine the statement about many buyers and sellers. This is a classic assumption of perfect competition, ensuring that no single buyer or seller can affect the market price. Step 2: Look at the statement about homogeneous products. This is also a standard assumption, which ensures that buyers do not differentiate between the goods of different sellers. Step 3: Consider the statement about perfect information. This is part of the standard set of assumptions, as it means that buyers and sellers know all relevant prices and conditions. Step 4: Evaluate the statement that average total costs continually decrease at all output levels. This is not an assumption of perfect competition. It is more like a specific cost condition and is generally not true in standard cost theory, which uses U shaped average cost curves. Step 5: Conclude that the statement about continually decreasing average total cost is the one that is not an assumption of perfect competition. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, recall the standard diagram of a perfectly competitive firm which shows marginal cost, average total cost and average variable cost curves. The average total cost curve initially falls due to spreading fixed costs and then rises due to diminishing marginal returns. If the model had assumed continuously falling average costs, it would be very different and closer to a natural monopoly situation. Since most textbooks do not list this as an assumption of perfect competition, it is reasonable to mark it as the incorrect statement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The assumption of many buyers and many sellers is vital to ensure that each participant is too small to affect the price and that the price taking behaviour is justified. The homogeneity of product ensures that there is no product differentiation, and this is one of the reasons why demand curves for individual firms in perfect competition are perfectly elastic. Perfect information among buyers and sellers allows everyone to know about prices and technology, preventing any firm from charging a higher price without losing customers, which is central to the model. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse cost conditions with market structure assumptions. They may think that because economies of scale are discussed in industry analysis, continuous fall in average cost is part of perfect competition assumptions. Others may wrongly believe that perfect competition requires zero economic profits at all times, although in the short run firms can earn supernormal profits. Keeping a clear list of assumptions about numbers of agents, product type, information and entry or exit helps avoid these confusions. Final Answer: The statement that is not an assumption of a perfectly competitive market is that average total costs continually decrease at all output levels.

Question 20

If the average total cost of a firm is Rs 54, the total fixed cost is Rs 45000, and the firm produces 2500 units of output, what is the average variable cost per unit?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Cost concepts such as total fixed cost, total variable cost, average total cost and average variable cost are basic tools in microeconomic analysis of firms. Exam questions often provide some of these values and ask you to calculate the missing ones using algebraic relationships. This question gives average total cost, total fixed cost and quantity produced, and asks for the average variable cost, which helps reinforce the understanding of the cost structure of a firm. Given Data / Assumptions: • Average total cost (ATC) is Rs 54 per unit. • Total fixed cost (TFC) is Rs 45000. • Quantity of output (Q) is 2500 units. • We must find average variable cost (AVC) per unit. Concept / Approach: The key relationships between the cost concepts are as follows. Total cost (TC) equals total fixed cost plus total variable cost. Average total cost equals total cost divided by quantity. Average variable cost equals total variable cost divided by quantity. Another useful identity is that average total cost equals average fixed cost plus average variable cost. Average fixed cost equals total fixed cost divided by quantity. Using these relationships, we can first find total cost from average total cost and quantity, then deduce total variable cost by subtracting total fixed cost, and finally divide by quantity to find average variable cost. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Use the definition of average total cost. ATC equals TC divided by Q, so TC equals ATC multiplied by Q. Step 2: Substitute the given values. ATC is 54 and Q is 2500, so TC equals 54 * 2500. Step 3: Compute 54 * 2500. Multiply 54 by 1000 to get 54000, then by 1500 to get 81000, but more simply 54 * 2500 equals 135000. So total cost is Rs 135000. Step 4: Total cost is the sum of total fixed cost and total variable cost. Therefore, TVC equals TC minus TFC. Step 5: Substitute the numbers. TVC equals 135000 minus 45000, which equals 90000. Step 6: Average variable cost equals total variable cost divided by quantity, so AVC equals 90000 divided by 2500. Step 7: Compute 90000 divided by 2500. Dividing numerator and denominator by 100, we get 900 divided by 25, which equals 36. So AVC is Rs 36 per unit. Verification / Alternative check: As an alternative check, we can use the identity ATC equals AFC plus AVC. First calculate average fixed cost. AFC equals TFC divided by Q, so equals 45000 divided by 2500. This equals 18. Since ATC is 54, AVC equals ATC minus AFC, that is 54 minus 18, which again gives 36. This cross check confirms that the calculated average variable cost is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rs 24 would imply that average fixed cost equals 30, because 54 minus 24 is 30, which would give total fixed cost of 30 multiplied by 2500, or 75000, not the given 45000. Rs 18 is actually the average fixed cost, not average variable cost, so marking it as AVC would mix up the roles of fixed and variable components. Rs 60 would be greater than the average total cost of 54, which is impossible because average total cost includes both fixed and variable components, and the variable part cannot by itself exceed the sum. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse total and average magnitudes or to forget that average total cost is the sum of average fixed cost and average variable cost. Some learners directly subtract total fixed cost from average total cost without multiplying by quantity, which leads to incorrect results. Another pitfall is careless arithmetic, especially when multiplying or dividing by large numbers like 2500. Writing down each step clearly helps avoid such errors. Final Answer: The average variable cost of the firm, given the data, is Rs 36 per unit.

Indian Economy Questions