Question 1

When the quantity demanded of a good increases as the income of the consumer increases (that is, the income effect is positive), such a good is known in microeconomics as which type of good?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In consumer theory, goods are classified according to how their demand responds to changes in income. Understanding the categories of normal goods, inferior goods, superior goods, and Giffen goods is essential for analysing demand functions and Engel curves. This question asks you to identify the term used for a good whose demand increases when the consumer income increases, assuming other factors such as price remain constant. Given Data / Assumptions: The quantity demanded of the good rises as consumer income rises. Other factors such as the price of the good and tastes are assumed to remain constant. The options include superior good, Giffen good, inferior good, normal good, and complementary good. We use standard microeconomic definitions of these terms. Concept / Approach: A normal good is defined as a good for which demand increases when income increases and decreases when income decreases, holding everything else constant. An inferior good shows the opposite pattern: as income rises, demand for that good falls because consumers switch to higher quality alternatives. Superior goods are sometimes used as a term for goods with high income elasticity (luxury goods), but the basic category for positive income effect is normal goods. A Giffen good is a special type of inferior good with a positive price effect, and complementary goods are defined by their relationship to other goods, not directly by income response. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key condition: demand increases when income increases, meaning income elasticity of demand is positive.Step 2: Recall that a normal good is any good with a positive income effect, so that higher income leads to higher quantity demanded.Step 3: Inferior goods are those for which demand falls when income rises, so they do not fit the described behaviour.Step 4: Giffen goods are a rare category of inferior goods where the demand curve slopes upwards with respect to price; they still do not show a simple positive income effect.Step 5: Superior goods or luxury goods are actually a subset of normal goods with income elasticity greater than one, but the general term for any good with positive income effect is normal good.Step 6: Complementary goods are defined in relation to another good (for example, tea and sugar) based on price effects, not purely by income changes.Step 7: Therefore, the correct answer is normal good. Verification / Alternative check: In basic microeconomics diagrams, an Engel curve for a normal good slopes upward as income rises, indicating higher quantities purchased at higher income levels. This matches the behaviour described in the question. For inferior goods, the Engel curve eventually bends backward, showing lower quantities purchased at higher income levels. Textbooks explicitly define normal goods as goods whose demand moves in the same direction as income. This verification confirms that normal good is the correct term for the situation presented. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Superior good: While superior or luxury goods also have demand rising with income, the more general and standard term for any good with positive income elasticity is normal good. Exams usually expect the term normal good for this basic definition. Giffen good: These are a special type of inferior good where higher prices may lead to higher quantity demanded, and they are not defined primarily by income changes. Inferior good: For these goods, demand falls when income rises, which is the opposite of what is described. Complementary good: This term refers to how demand for one good is related to the price of another good and does not directly describe income effects. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse superior goods with normal goods and think that the term superior good is always used when demand rises with income. It is helpful to remember that superior goods are a subset of normal goods with a very strong positive income relationship, while normal goods is the standard, broader category. Reading questions carefully and noting whether they ask for the general term or a special case helps avoid mistakes. Final Answer: A good whose demand increases with an increase in income is called a normal good.

Question 2

The demand for a finished commodity such as bread is called a direct demand, but in microeconomics the demand for a factor of production such as labour or machinery, which arises because of the demand for the final product, is known as what type of …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In microeconomics, it is important to distinguish between different forms of demand. Consumers demand final goods and services directly for their own satisfaction, while firms demand inputs such as labour, land, and capital because these inputs help to produce final goods. This difference is captured by the terms direct demand and derived demand. The question asks you to name the type of demand associated with factors of production like labour or machinery. Given Data / Assumptions: Demand for a commodity like bread is referred to as direct demand, because consumers want it for its own sake. Demand for factors of production (for example, labour, machines, raw materials) arises because they are needed to produce goods and services that consumers or other firms want. The options list cross demand, joint demand, derived demand, independent demand, and complementary demand. We use standard definitions from microeconomic theory. Concept / Approach: When the demand for a good or service arises not for its own sake but because it helps to produce another good that is in demand, economists call this derived demand. For example, the demand for steel is derived from the demand for cars, bridges, and machinery in which steel is used. Similarly, the demand for labour in a factory is derived from the demand for the products that factory makes. Direct demand, by contrast, is the demand for goods like food or clothing that are desired for final consumption. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the demand in question is for a factor of production, not a final consumer good.Step 2: Recognise that firms hire labour, buy machinery, and purchase raw materials because they wish to produce goods and services that will be sold in the market.Step 3: This means the demand for the factor depends on, or is derived from, the demand for the final product.Step 4: The technical term for demand that originates in this way is derived demand.Step 5: Cross demand is used when the demand for one good is related to the price of another good (for example, substitutes and complements).Step 6: Joint demand occurs when two goods are demanded together, like cars and petrol.Step 7: Independent demand refers to demand that does not depend on any other product, which is not the case here.Step 8: Therefore, the correct answer is derived demand. Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks on microeconomics and business economics often give examples such as the demand for bricks being derived from the demand for houses, or the demand for teachers being derived from the demand for education services. In labour economics, the entire analysis of how many workers a firm hires is based on the idea that labour demand depends on the marginal revenue product of labour, which in turn depends on the demand for the firm output. These examples consistently use the term derived demand, confirming the correctness of this term for factor demand. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cross demand: This describes how the demand for one good responds to the price change of another related good, not how input demand arises from output demand. Joint demand: This occurs when two goods are demanded together for joint use, such as printer and ink, which is different from factor demand. Independent demand: This refers to demand that does not depend on the demand for any other product; factor demand clearly does depend on final product demand. Complementary demand: This term is not a standard classification in basic demand theory; instead, the relationship between complementary goods is captured through cross demand. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse derived demand with joint demand or complementary demand because all involve relationships between goods. The key is to remember that derived demand refers to input output relationships (for example, labour and the goods produced), while joint or complementary demand refers to goods that are used or consumed together. Keeping this distinction in mind makes it easier to answer factor demand questions correctly in exams. Final Answer: The demand for a factor of production is called derived demand.

Question 3

In macroeconomics and national income accounting, depreciation refers to the loss in value over time of which of the following, due to wear and tear, obsolescence, or normal use?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Depreciation is a key concept in both accounting and macroeconomics. In national income accounting, it is also called consumption of fixed capital. It measures the loss in value of fixed assets used in production, arising from normal wear and tear, obsolescence, and the passage of time. Understanding what exactly depreciates in this sense helps in correctly interpreting figures such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Net Domestic Product (NDP). Given Data / Assumptions: Depreciation is defined as a loss in value over time. Causes of depreciation include wear and tear, obsolescence, and normal use. The options mention final consumer goods, a single machine, the entire capital stock of fixed assets, inventory, and financial assets. We assume the context is macroeconomic measurement, not just a single accounting entry for one asset. Concept / Approach: In national accounts, depreciation applies to the stock of fixed capital used in the production process. This capital stock includes plant, machinery, buildings, equipment, and other long lived assets that are repeatedly used in production. Over time, these assets lose value as they wear out or become outdated. This loss is measured as depreciation. Final consumer goods are meant for consumption, not production, and are not depreciated in the same sense. Inventories are current assets that can be sold or used up, and financial assets like shares do not physically depreciate, though their market value can change. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that depreciation is primarily associated with fixed capital assets used in production, not with goods meant for immediate consumption.Step 2: A single machine in a factory does depreciate, but the concept in macroeconomic aggregates generally refers to the entire stock of such assets, collectively called capital stock.Step 3: In national income accounting, the term consumption of fixed capital is used to denote the depreciation of the whole capital stock over a period.Step 4: Finished goods inventory is not depreciated; it may be revalued if prices change, but this is treated differently from depreciation of fixed assets.Step 5: Financial assets like shares and debentures do not experience physical wear and tear; changes in their market values are capital gains or losses, not depreciation.Step 6: Therefore, the most accurate option is the capital stock of fixed assets such as plant and machinery. Verification / Alternative check: When calculating Net Domestic Product (NDP), we subtract depreciation (consumption of fixed capital) from Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This adjustment accounts for the fact that part of the year output must be used to replace worn out capital. The underlying capital stock includes all fixed assets used in production across the economy, not just one machine or one building. Accounting standards similarly spread the cost of these fixed assets over their useful life via depreciation. This confirms that depreciation applies to the capital stock of fixed assets. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Final consumer goods used by households: These are goods meant for consumption and are not considered capital stock; they are not depreciated in national accounts. A single machine used in a factory: While this machine does depreciate, the question is about the general concept in macroeconomics, which refers to the entire capital stock, not just one asset. The stock of finished goods inventory held by firms: Inventory may lose value if it becomes obsolete or damaged, but this is treated as valuation changes or losses, not depreciation of fixed capital. Financial assets such as shares and debentures: These are paper claims on real assets or future income; changes in their value are capital gains or losses, not depreciation. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes associate any loss in value with depreciation, including price fluctuations in financial markets or inventory wastage. It is important to remember that in macroeconomics, depreciation specifically refers to the consumption of fixed capital stock in production. Keeping this focus on durable, productive assets helps in answering exam questions on GDP, NDP, and related aggregates correctly. Final Answer: Depreciation refers to the loss in value of the capital stock of fixed assets such as plant and machinery.

Question 4

For kharif crops in the agricultural year 2018–19, the Government of India announced that the minimum support price (MSP) would be fixed at a level of at least what percentage of the cost of production, thereby fulfilling a promise made in the Union…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Minimum Support Price (MSP) is an important policy instrument used by the Government of India to protect farmers from severe fluctuations in agricultural prices. In the Union Budget 2018–19, the government promised to ensure MSPs for kharif crops at a certain margin over the cost of production. This question asks you to recall the specific percentage of the cost of production at which MSPs were to be fixed for kharif crops in 2018–19. Given Data / Assumptions: The context is kharif crops for the agricultural year 2018–19. The government promised to fix MSP at a level of at least a certain percentage of the cost of production. The options list 50 per cent, 250 per cent, 200 per cent, 100 per cent, and 150 per cent of the cost of production. We assume the cost of production is measured as per government cost concepts such as A2+FL or related definitions used in MSP calculations. Concept / Approach: In Budget 2018–19 and related announcements, the government declared that MSPs for kharif crops would be set at a level of at least 1.5 times the cost of production, which translates into a 50 per cent margin over the cost. When expressed as a percentage of cost, this means MSP is at least 150 per cent of cost (cost plus 50 per cent). However, many exam questions frame the promise as fixing MSPs at a level of at least 50 per cent over the cost of production. Here the question wording refers to what percentage of the cost of production forms the margin, and the promised margin was 50 per cent. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the government promise was to fix MSPs at 1.5 times the cost of production for kharif crops.Step 2: Express 1.5 times cost in terms of percentage of cost: 1.5 times cost equals 150 per cent of cost.Step 3: However, policy discussions and exam summaries often emphasise the margin over cost, stating that MSP would give at least 50 per cent return over the cost of production.Step 4: The question asks: 'at least ________ per cent of the cost of production', referring to this promised margin.Step 5: Among the options, 50 per cent of the cost of production correctly reflects the promised margin over cost.Step 6: Extremely high percentages like 200 or 250 per cent of cost would imply unrealistic MSP levels far above actual policy, and 100 per cent of cost would mean only covering cost with no margin. Verification / Alternative check: Government statements around the 2018–19 Budget frequently highlighted that farmers would receive MSPs at least 50 per cent higher than the cost of production for kharif crops. Media reports and exam oriented notes also repeated the figure of 50 per cent margin over cost. When interpreted in terms of what percentage of cost the margin itself represents, this is 50 per cent. In contrast, 100 per cent of cost would mean no profit margin, and numbers like 200 or 250 per cent would contradict the 1.5 times cost theme. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 250 per cent of the cost of production: This would imply MSP at 2.5 times cost, which goes far beyond the announced 1.5 times cost policy. 200 per cent of the cost of production: This indicates MSP at 2 times cost, again not consistent with the 1.5 times cost promise. 100 per cent of the cost of production: This would mean MSP equal to cost with no margin or profit, which contradicts the promise of giving farmers a margin. 150 per cent of the cost of production: Although 1.5 times cost equals 150 per cent of cost in total, the question specifically refers to the percent margin that fulfills the budget promise, which is stated as 50 per cent over cost in many exam preparations. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up total MSP as a percentage of cost with the margin over cost. Remember that 1.5 times cost means cost plus a 50 per cent margin on cost. Many exam questions phrase the promise as at least 50 per cent over the cost of production. Reading the wording carefully and distinguishing between total as a multiple and margin as a percentage helps in choosing the correct option. Final Answer: For kharif crops 2018–19, MSPs were announced at a level of at least 50 per cent of the cost of production as a margin over cost.

Question 5

In international economics, the difference between the value of a country's exports of goods and its imports of goods over a period is called what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: When studying a country external sector, it is important to distinguish between various measures such as exports, imports, balance of trade, and balance of payments. While terms like balance of trade and balance of payments sound similar, they refer to different concepts. This question asks you to identify the term used for the simple difference between the value of exports and imports of goods over a given period. Given Data / Assumptions: We are focusing on exports and imports of goods. The question asks for the difference between the value of exports and the value of imports. The options include assets and liabilities, balance of payments, GDP, balance of trade, and current account deficit. We assume standard textbook definitions of these external sector terms. Concept / Approach: The balance of trade refers specifically to the difference between the value of a country visible exports and visible imports of goods. If exports exceed imports, there is a trade surplus; if imports exceed exports, there is a trade deficit. The balance of payments is a broader statement that records all economic transactions between residents of a country and the rest of the world, including trade in goods and services, investment flows, and transfers. Gross Domestic Product is the value of final goods and services produced within a country and does not directly express the export import gap. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify what exactly is being compared: the value of exports of goods and the value of imports of goods.Step 2: Recall that the term balance of trade is defined as exports of goods minus imports of goods.Step 3: Recognise that balance of payments also includes services, income, and capital flows, so it is broader than just trade in goods.Step 4: GDP measures total domestic production, not specifically the difference between exports and imports.Step 5: Assets and liabilities refer to net international investment position, again a different concept.Step 6: Current account deficit refers to a negative balance on the current account, including goods, services, investment income, and transfers, not just goods.Step 7: Therefore, the correct term for the difference between exports and imports of goods is balance of trade. Verification / Alternative check: Standard international economics textbooks define the balance of trade as the difference between the value of exports and the value of imports of merchandise. Trade statistics reported by governments and international organisations often present the trade balance as a separate figure within the broader balance of payments. Looking at such reports, you will see headings like exports, imports, and trade balance, which confirm that the term balance of trade correctly describes the exports minus imports of goods. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Assets and liabilities position: This term is more related to the stock of foreign assets and liabilities at a point in time, not the flow of exports and imports. Balance of payments: This encompasses all external transactions, including goods, services, income, and capital flows, and is not limited to the trade in goods. Gross Domestic Product (GDP): GDP is a measure of domestic production and includes consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports, but it is not itself the difference between exports and imports. Current account deficit: This describes a situation where the current account (which includes goods, services, income, and transfers) is in deficit; it is not the general term for exports minus imports of goods. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse balance of trade with balance of payments because both involve external flows. A simple memory aid is that trade refers to goods (merchandise), while payments covers a wider range of transactions. When a question specifically mentions exports and imports of goods, balance of trade is usually the correct term to choose. Final Answer: The difference between exports and imports of goods is called the balance of trade.

Question 6

The Law of Demand in microeconomics is based on which basic behavioural idea about how people change the quantity they buy of a good when the price of that good changes, assuming other factors remain constant?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Law of Demand is one of the most fundamental principles in microeconomics. It describes the typical inverse relationship between the price of a good and the quantity demanded of that good, holding all other factors constant (ceteris paribus). Understanding this behavioural relationship is essential for drawing demand curves, analysing market equilibrium, and interpreting consumer responses to price changes. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on how quantity demanded changes when the price of a good changes. Other factors like income, tastes, and prices of related goods are assumed to remain constant. The options include statements about income changes, price changes, spending all money, wanting more of everything, and quality changes. We assume standard rational consumer behaviour in a competitive market. Concept / Approach: The Law of Demand states that, ceteris paribus, the quantity demanded of a good falls when its price rises and rises when its price falls. This inverse relationship arises due to substitution and income effects: as a good becomes cheaper, consumers substitute it for relatively more expensive goods, and the lower price effectively increases real income, allowing them to buy more. The law does not say that people buy more as income rises irrespective of price or that they always spend all their money. It focuses specifically on the price quantity demanded relationship. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the law of demand is a statement about price and quantity demanded, not about income or quality directly.Step 2: Recall the standard wording: other things remaining the same, the quantity demanded of a good increases when its price falls and decreases when its price rises.Step 3: Among the options, the statement that people buy more of a good as the price of the good falls correctly captures this inverse relationship.Step 4: A statement about buying more as income increases describes income effects but belongs to the classification of normal and inferior goods, not the law of demand itself.Step 5: Statements saying that people always spend all their money or always want more of everything are too vague and do not express the precise relationship.Step 6: A statement about buying less as quality improves contradicts normal consumer behaviour and is not linked to the law of demand.Step 7: Therefore, the correct formulation is that people buy more of a good as its price falls. Verification / Alternative check: Graphically, the law of demand is represented by a downward sloping demand curve in the price quantity plane. At lower prices, the curve shows higher quantities demanded; at higher prices, it shows lower quantities demanded. This visual representation matches the idea that people buy more when prices fall. Everyday examples, such as higher petrol consumption when fuel prices drop or increased sale of items in a discount sale, also illustrate this relationship and confirm the law. Why Other Options Are Wrong: People buy more of a good as their income increases, regardless of its price: This describes the effect of income changes on demand and is related to normal goods, not the pure price demand relationship. People will spend all of their money on some good or the other: This is a very general statement about consumption and does not directly express the price quantity relationship. People always want more of everything, even if they have no money to buy anything: Desire alone does not constitute demand; demand requires purchasing power and willingness to buy. People buy less of a good as its quality improves: This is contrary to usual behaviour; higher quality at the same price often increases demand, other things equal. Common Pitfalls: Some students confuse changes in demand due to income or tastes with movements along the demand curve due to price changes. The law of demand deals with movements along the curve when price changes, not shifts of the curve due to other factors. Remembering the phrase ceteris paribus and focusing on the price quantity inverse relationship helps keep the concept clear in exam situations. Final Answer: The Law of Demand is based on the idea that people buy more of a good as the price of that good falls, other things being equal.

Question 7

In the commonly used financial term CAGR, which stands for ______ Annual Growth Rate and is used to describe a constant growth rate over a specified period, what does the letter 'C' represent?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: CAGR is a widely used term in finance and business analysis. It summarises the average annual growth rate of an investment or financial variable over a period of time, assuming that it grows at a steady, compounded rate. Understanding what each letter in this acronym stands for helps in remembering both its full form and its conceptual meaning. This question specifically asks about the letter 'C' in CAGR. Given Data / Assumptions: CAGR is an acronym used in business and finance. It refers to an annual growth rate that assumes compounding over time. The full form is something Annual Growth Rate, where the missing word begins with the letter C. The options for 'C' are Control, Compound, Credit, Call, and Cumulative. Concept / Approach: CAGR stands for Compound Annual Growth Rate. It represents the rate at which an investment would have grown if it had grown at a constant rate compounded annually from the beginning to the end of the period. The compounding aspect is crucial, as it accounts for the effect of growth on growth. This is different from a simple arithmetic average of annual percentage changes. Therefore, the letter 'C' in CAGR represents the word compound. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the full form of CAGR from standard financial terminology: Compound Annual Growth Rate.Step 2: Identify the missing word in the acronym: C for Compound, A for Annual, G for Growth, R for Rate.Step 3: Check the options. Among Control, Compound, Credit, Call, and Cumulative, only Compound fits the standard expansion.Step 4: Also note that the concept of CAGR relies on compounding of returns, which reinforces the word compound.Step 5: Therefore, the letter C in CAGR stands for Compound. Verification / Alternative check: Investment reports, mutual fund fact sheets, and corporate financial presentations frequently state phrases like 'the investment delivered a 12 per cent Compound Annual Growth Rate over five years.' This confirms that CAGR expands to Compound Annual Growth Rate. The formula used to calculate CAGR also involves taking the final value divided by the initial value, raising it to the power of 1 divided by the number of years, and subtracting one, which is the standard formula for a compound annual rate. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Control: There is no concept called Control Annual Growth Rate in standard financial terminology. Credit: Credit relates to borrowing and lending, not to growth rate measurement in this context. Call: Call is used in options and bond markets but has nothing to do with the acronym CAGR. Cumulative: While growth can be cumulative, the recognised acronym is for Compound Annual Growth Rate, not Cumulative Annual Growth Rate. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may confuse compound with cumulative or think of CAGR as a simple average. Remember that CAGR explicitly refers to compound growth, which means that each year growth is applied not just to the original principal but also to accumulated gains. This compounding effect is why the letter C stands for Compound in the acronym. Final Answer: In CAGR, the letter 'C' stands for Compound, as in Compound Annual Growth Rate.

Question 8

Under the Pradhan Mantri Vaya Vandana Yojana (PMVVY) pension scheme for senior citizens, the Government of India decided to extend the period during which the scheme would remain open for subscription up to which of the following timelines?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Pradhan Mantri Vaya Vandana Yojana (PMVVY) is a government supported pension scheme designed to provide a guaranteed pension to senior citizens. It is implemented through the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). At different times, the government has extended the availability period of this scheme. Many exam questions ask about the date up to which PMVVY was extended in a specific phase, especially around the time of its first major extension. Given Data / Assumptions: The scheme is PMVVY, targeted at senior citizens. The question asks about the deadline up to which the scheme was extended for subscription in a particular extension phase. The options list March 2019, March 2020, March 2021, March 2022, and March 2023. We focus on the widely reported government decision to extend PMVVY beyond its initial one year window. Concept / Approach: PMVVY was initially introduced for a limited period. Later, the Union Cabinet approved the extension of the scheme for a further period so that senior citizens could continue to subscribe. The key extension that appears frequently in exam questions is the extension of the last date for subscription up to 31 March 2020. Later policy changes extended or modified the scheme further, but the standard general knowledge question refers to this March 2020 deadline. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that after its initial launch, the government decided to keep PMVVY open for additional years.Step 2: The widely publicised extension in the early phase set the last date for subscription as 31 March 2020.Step 3: Among the options provided, March 2020 matches this date exactly.Step 4: March 2019 refers to an earlier end date strictly within the initial period and does not capture the extension.Step 5: Later dates such as March 2021, March 2022, and March 2023 relate to subsequent policy discussions and are not the standard answer for this specific extension question.Step 6: Therefore, the correct option for the timeline up to which PMVVY was initially extended is March, 2020. Verification / Alternative check: Government press releases and standard exam preparatory materials on social security schemes mention that PMVVY, launched in 2017, was extended up to 31 March 2020, with specific features such as a fixed pension rate and a ceiling on the amount that a senior citizen could invest. This date is repeatedly highlighted as the extended last date for entry during that phase of the scheme. Although later budgets introduced further changes, questions framed with the given options generally expect March 2020 as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: March, 2019: This does not reflect the extension; it would have already passed when the extension decision was announced. March, 2021 / March, 2022 / March, 2023: These dates go beyond the initial extension phase that was widely reported and used in many exam questions. While later policy changes may have further modified timelines, the standard answer for the first extension is March 2020. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse different phases of extension for PMVVY and select later dates that they have seen in newer policy documents. It is important to match the date with the specific context of the question. When an exam question about PMVVY mentions the early extension decision, the expected answer is usually March 2020. Paying attention to the time frame and wording helps in avoiding such confusion. Final Answer: Under the extension referred to in this question, PMVVY remained open for subscription up to March, 2020.

Question 9

In the Indian money market, a Certificate of Deposit (CD) is a negotiable money market instrument issued by banks and certain financial institutions in the form of which type of promissory note?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Certificates of Deposit (CDs) are important short term instruments in the Indian money market. They provide banks and certain financial institutions with a way to raise funds from the market, and they offer investors a relatively safe, interest bearing asset. To answer questions on CDs correctly, it is useful to know their basic legal form and characteristics, including whether they are demand or usance instruments. Given Data / Assumptions: We are discussing Certificates of Deposit (CDs) issued in the Indian money market. CDs are negotiable money market instruments. The options describe different forms of promissory notes and a bearer cheque. We assume the standard regulatory framework in which CDs are issued by scheduled commercial banks and certain financial institutions. Concept / Approach: In India, Certificates of Deposit are issued in dematerialised form or as usance promissory notes. A usance promissory note is payable at a future date, that is, on maturity, rather than on demand. CDs have a fixed maturity period and a specified interest rate or discount. They are not payable on demand like demand promissory notes or bearer cheques. The negotiability of CDs allows them to be traded in the secondary market before maturity, but their legal form is that of usance promissory notes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that CDs are time deposits with a fixed maturity, often ranging from a few months up to one year for banks.Step 2: Time deposits by definition are payable on a specified future date, not on demand, which means they match the concept of a usance instrument.Step 3: The Reserve Bank of India guidelines state that CDs may be issued in demat form or as usance promissory notes.Step 4: A demand promissory note or bearer cheque would imply immediate payment on demand, which is not the case for CDs.Step 5: Describing CDs as derivative usance promissory notes or allowing either demand or usance forms would not reflect the standard regulatory design.Step 6: Therefore, the correct form is usance promissory note. Verification / Alternative check: If you look at typical descriptions of CDs in exam oriented banking awareness material, they clearly mention that CDs are negotiable money market instruments in the form of usance promissory notes, issued at a discount to face value and redeemable at par on maturity. The time to maturity and the fact that investors must wait until that date to receive the face value (unless they sell in the secondary market) confirm that CDs are not payable on demand. This matches the definition of usance, which refers to payment at a future date. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Derivative usance promissory note: The term derivative here is misleading and not part of the standard description of CDs. Demand promissory note: This would be payable on demand, while CDs are payable at the end of a fixed term. Either demand or usance promissory note: Regulatory guidelines do not present CDs as instruments that can be either; they are structured as time instruments. Bearer cheque payable on demand: Cheques are different instruments used for payment, not for raising fixed term deposits from the market. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes assume that any easily tradable instrument must be payable on demand, and therefore select demand promissory note. It is important to distinguish between an instrument being negotiable (transferable) and being payable on demand. CDs are negotiable but have fixed maturities, which is why they are usance instruments. Keeping this difference clear helps in correctly answering money market questions. Final Answer: A Certificate of Deposit in India is issued in the form of a usance promissory note.

Question 10

A company faces a price elasticity of demand of -2.5 for its product and is currently selling 10,000 units per month. If it wants to increase the quantity sold by 6 per cent, by approximately what percentage must it reduce its price, assuming the pr…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price. It is widely used by firms when deciding how much to alter prices in order to achieve a target change in sales volume. This question presents a numerical application of the elasticity formula, asking you to calculate the approximate percentage price reduction needed to increase quantity demanded by a given percentage when elasticity is known. Given Data / Assumptions: Price elasticity of demand (E) for the product is -2.5. The company currently sells 10,000 units per month (this helps set context, but the calculation focuses on percentages). The firm wants to increase quantity sold by 6 per cent, so percentage change in quantity demanded (ΔQ%) is +6%. Price elasticity is assumed to remain constant over the small change in price. We use the standard formula: E = (percentage change in quantity demanded) / (percentage change in price). Concept / Approach: Price elasticity of demand is defined as E = (ΔQ% / ΔP%), where ΔQ% is the percentage change in quantity demanded and ΔP% is the percentage change in price. Because demand curves typically slope downward, E is negative, reflecting that quantity demanded and price move in opposite directions. If we know E and the desired ΔQ%, we can rearrange the formula to find ΔP% as ΔP% = ΔQ% / E. Here, the company wants to increase quantity demanded by 6 per cent, and elasticity is -2.5, so we can compute the required price change. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write down the elasticity formula: E = ΔQ% / ΔP%.Step 2: Substitute the known values: E = -2.5 and ΔQ% = +6% (since the company wants a 6 per cent increase in quantity demanded).Step 3: Rearrange the formula to solve for ΔP%: ΔP% = ΔQ% / E.Step 4: Substitute the numbers: ΔP% = 6 / (-2.5).Step 5: Compute 6 divided by 2.5: 6 / 2.5 = 2.4. Because E is negative, ΔP% = -2.4%.Step 6: The negative sign indicates that price must be reduced by approximately 2.4 per cent to achieve a 6 per cent increase in quantity demanded.Step 7: Among the given options, 2.40% matches this required price reduction. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify the calculation by checking the implied elasticity using our result. If price falls by 2.4 per cent and quantity demanded increases by 6 per cent, then E = 6 / (-2.4) = -2.5, which matches the given elasticity. This confirms that our computed price change is consistent with the defined elasticity. The exact initial price or quantity does not matter because the elasticity formula uses percentage changes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 3.50%: If price fell by 3.5 per cent and quantity increased by 6 per cent, elasticity would be 6 / (-3.5) ≈ -1.71, which does not match the given elasticity of -2.5. 15.00%: A 15 per cent price cut would be far too large. With elasticity -2.5, this would imply quantity increasing by about 37.5 per cent, which is much more than the desired 6 per cent. 2.50%: Using 2.5 per cent, elasticity would be 6 / (-2.5) = -2.4, which is close but not exactly the given -2.5; the question expects more precise alignment with -2.5 via 2.4 per cent. 1.50%: A 1.5 per cent reduction would yield elasticity 6 / (-1.5) = -4, which is very different from -2.5. Common Pitfalls: One common error is to invert the formula incorrectly, using ΔP% / ΔQ% instead of ΔQ% / ΔP%. Another is to ignore the negative sign on elasticity and forget that a rise in quantity demanded typically requires a fall in price. Students may also guess a round number like 2.5 per cent without carefully dividing 6 by 2.5. To avoid such mistakes, always start from the correct elasticity formula, rearrange it algebraically, and pay attention to the sign of the elasticity. Final Answer: To increase quantity sold by 6 per cent, the company must reduce its price by approximately 2.40 per cent.

Question 11

In international economics, the deliberate lowering of the value of a country's domestic currency relative to a foreign reference currency under a fixed or managed exchange rate system is called what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Dealing with exchange rates is a central part of international economics and international trade policy. One important concept is what happens when a government or monetary authority deliberately lowers the external value of its domestic currency relative to a foreign reference currency. This question is testing your understanding of the precise term used for this deliberate policy action, which often appears in discussions about balance of payments, export competitiveness, and exchange rate regimes. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on a deliberate policy action related to the value of a domestic currency. The change is relative to a foreign reference currency or a basket of currencies. We are considering a fixed or managed exchange rate framework, not a purely free float. We need the correct technical term used in macroeconomics and international finance. Concept / Approach: In a fixed or pegged exchange rate system, the authorities can adjust the official parity of the domestic currency. When they reduce the value of the domestic currency in terms of foreign currency, this is called devaluation. When they raise the value of the domestic currency, this is called revaluation. These terms differ from depreciation and appreciation, which usually refer to market driven changes in a flexible exchange rate system rather than a deliberate policy decision. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the change described is a deliberate policy decision, not a market fluctuation. Step 2: Recognize that the value of the domestic currency is being lowered relative to a foreign reference currency. Step 3: Recall the terminology: in a fixed exchange rate system, a deliberate lowering of the domestic currency is called devaluation. Step 4: Match this definition to the options provided and select the correct term. Verification / Alternative check: A quick way to verify is to remember that devaluation is often used by countries to make exports cheaper and imports costlier, in the hope of improving the trade balance. Revaluation does the opposite by making the domestic currency stronger. If the question had been about a market driven fall in the currency in a floating regime, the correct term would be depreciation, not devaluation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Revaluation: This refers to raising, not lowering, the official value of the domestic currency under a fixed exchange rate system, so it is the opposite of what is described. Down valuation: This is not a standard, widely accepted technical term in macroeconomics textbooks for this policy. It sounds similar in ordinary language but is not the precise concept tested in exams. Negative valuation: This has no standard meaning in exchange rate theory and does not describe the deliberate lowering of the currency value. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse devaluation with depreciation and revaluation with appreciation. Remember that devaluation and revaluation are associated with official government or central bank actions under a fixed or managed exchange rate. Depreciation and appreciation are usually market driven changes under a flexible system. Another pitfall is picking a vaguely similar sounding term instead of the precise textbook concept. Final Answer: The deliberate lowering of the value of a domestic currency relative to a foreign reference currency under a fixed or managed exchange rate system is called devaluation.

Question 12

In microeconomics, the change in quantity supplied that occurs due to a change in the price of a good, while other factors remain constant, is described as what movement along the supply curve?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the theory of supply, it is important to distinguish between movements along a given supply curve and shifts of the entire supply curve. The question focuses on what we call the change in quantity supplied that happens purely because the price of the good changes, assuming that all other determinants of supply remain unchanged. This is a standard terminology check in introductory microeconomics. Given Data / Assumptions: There is a given supply curve for a particular good. Only the price of the good is changing. All other supply determinants (technology, input prices, number of firms, taxes, expectations) are constant. We are interested in the name for movement along the existing curve. Concept / Approach: When price changes and supply conditions aside from price remain unchanged, we move along the same supply curve. An increase in price leads to a higher quantity supplied, called expansion of supply. A decrease in price leads to a lower quantity supplied, called contraction of supply. Together, these movements are summarized as expansion and contraction of supply. By contrast, changes in other factors cause the entire curve to shift to the right or left and are described as increase or decrease in supply, not expansion or contraction. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognize the phrase “movement along the supply curve” as a key hint. Step 2: Recall that a movement along the curve is due solely to price changes. Step 3: Remember that higher price leads to expansion of supply and lower price leads to contraction of supply. Step 4: Conclude that movement along the supply curve is collectively described as “expansion and contraction of supply”. Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to contrast this with the phrase “increase in supply”. An increase in supply refers to a rightward shift of the entire supply curve because of improved technology or lower input costs, not just a change in price. Since the question explicitly mentions movement along the supply curve, the only correct technical expression is expansion and contraction of supply. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Increase in supply: This means a shift of the entire supply curve to the right, due to non price factors, not movement along the curve. Contraction of supply only: This refers only to the case when price falls and quantity supplied falls, so it is incomplete because it ignores expansion of supply. Expansion of supply only: This refers only to the case when price rises, so it again ignores contraction of supply and is incomplete. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse the phrases increase in supply and expansion of supply, as well as decrease in supply and contraction of supply. Remember that expansion and contraction are associated with movements along the same curve due to price changes, while increase and decrease refer to shifts of the curve due to other determinants. Understanding this distinction is crucial for interpreting diagrams and exam questions correctly. Final Answer: Movement along the supply curve due to changes in price is known as expansion and contraction of supply.

Question 13

In the context of demographic trends in India, the pattern of population growth is best characterized by what combination of birth and death rates?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Population growth patterns are a central theme in demography and development economics. For India, many exam questions focus on how population has grown in the post independence period and what demographic characteristics are responsible for that growth. This question asks you to recognize the typical pattern that has driven India's population growth, especially in terms of birth and death rates over time. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers to the broad demographic pattern in India during the modern period. We are concerned with overall population growth, not temporary fluctuations. Key variables are the birth rate and the death rate. We assume no drastic change in migration that would dominate the effect of births and deaths. Concept / Approach: In demographic transition theory, developing economies like India initially experience high birth rates and high death rates. As health care, sanitation and nutrition improve, death rates start to fall, especially infant and child mortality. Birth rates, however, remain high for some time. This combination of a high birth rate with a declining death rate leads to rapid population growth. Only later, as socio economic development progresses, education improves and family planning spreads, the birth rate itself starts to decline and the rate of population growth slows down. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that population growth depends on the difference between birth rate and death rate. Step 2: For India, understand that improvements in public health have reduced death rates significantly over time. Step 3: Recognize that birth rates remained relatively high for a long period even as death rates declined. Step 4: Conclude that India's population growth is best characterized by a high or rising birth rate combined with a declining death rate. Verification / Alternative check: If death rates had increased, population growth would have been slower, which is not consistent with observed trends. Similarly, a simple increase in the number of old people is a result of better health and longevity, but it does not by itself explain rapid overall growth unless births remain high. Therefore, the combination of high birth rate and declining death rate is the most accurate description of India's demographic pattern during its rapid growth phase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: An increase in the rate of death: This would slow population growth, which contradicts the historical experience of rapid growth in India. An increase in the ratio of females: Changes in the sex ratio matter for social issues but do not directly explain the basic pattern of population growth in terms of births and deaths. An increasing number of old people only: This reflects aging and improved longevity but is a secondary aspect, not the primary driver of rapid population growth. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus on isolated facts such as an aging population or changes in sex ratio instead of the basic demographic arithmetic of births minus deaths. Another pitfall is to assume that population growth must always be linked to increasing birth rates, ignoring the crucial role of falling death rates that often occurs first in the demographic transition. Understanding the sequence of changes is essential for correctly answering such questions. Final Answer: India's population growth is characterized by an increase in the birth rate and a declining death rate.

Question 14

In banking and financial markets, which description best explains the term “bank run”?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Banking stability is an important topic in economics and finance. One well known phenomenon related to banking crises is a “bank run”. This happens when many depositors lose confidence in a bank and rush to withdraw their money, potentially causing serious liquidity problems. The question is checking whether you can identify the correct description of a bank run among several related but different banking concepts. Given Data / Assumptions: We are dealing with a commercial bank that accepts deposits from the public. Depositors are free to withdraw their funds subject to the terms of their accounts. There is a sudden, widespread loss of confidence among depositors. The problem is primarily about liquidity and confidence, not routine accounting ratios. Concept / Approach: A bank run occurs when a large number of depositors try to withdraw their funds in cash at the same time because they fear that the bank may become insolvent or may not be able to return their money later. Since banks operate on a fractional reserve basis, they do not keep all deposits in cash. Instead, they lend most of the deposits out. When too many depositors demand cash simultaneously, the bank can face a liquidity crisis even if its assets are fundamentally sound. Understanding this concept helps explain why deposit insurance and central bank lender of last resort facilities are important. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key word “bank run”, which is usually associated with panic and mass withdrawals. Step 2: Recall that the core feature of a bank run is many depositors trying to withdraw money at the same time. Step 3: Compare each option to see which one captures this panic withdrawal situation. Step 4: Select the option that explicitly mentions deposit holders withdrawing cash in a panic situation. Verification / Alternative check: A memory aid is to think of people “running” to the bank to get their money out. The term does not refer to a normal accounting ratio or a routine end of day cash balance. It refers to an abnormal, crisis situation. Therefore, any option that describes a routine measure or a regular period of operations can be rejected. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The net balance of money in the bank's chest at the end of the day: This is a simple cash position, not a bank run. The ratio of a bank's total deposits and total liabilities: This could describe some financial ratio but has nothing to do with the panic withdrawal phenomenon. The period in which a bank creates the highest credit in the market: This might relate to credit expansion but is unrelated to sudden withdrawal of deposits due to panic. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse a bank run with normal liquidity management or with vague ideas about high lending periods. Another pitfall is to think that a bank run always reflects actual insolvency. In fact, even a solvent bank can face a run if depositors lose confidence. The key idea is panic driven mass withdrawals, not normal operations. Final Answer: A bank run is best described as a panic situation when deposit holders start withdrawing cash from the bank in large numbers.

Question 15

Which of the following outcomes is most likely when an economy is experiencing sustained inflationary pressure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Inflation is a sustained rise in the general price level of goods and services in an economy. When an economy is under persistent inflationary pressure, it affects many macroeconomic variables such as exchange rates, interest rates, and the real value of financial assets. This question asks you to identify which listed outcome is most likely to occur when inflation is high and persistent, focusing particularly on the external value of the domestic currency and the fortunes of different economic agents. Given Data / Assumptions: The economy is experiencing sustained inflation, not just a one time price spike. Other countries may have lower inflation rates by comparison. Exchange rates are at least partly market determined, so inflation differentials matter. We are considering typical textbook relationships, not rare or special cases. Concept / Approach: In international economics, when a country has a higher inflation rate than its trading partners, its goods become relatively expensive. This tends to reduce export competitiveness and may increase demand for imports, putting downward pressure on the domestic currency in foreign exchange markets. As a result, the domestic currency is likely to depreciate. At the same time, central banks often raise nominal interest rates to fight inflation, so the nominal cost of borrowing usually rises, not falls. Fixed interest bondholders typically lose in real terms because their interest payments have less purchasing power when prices are high. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that sustained inflation reduces the real purchasing power of the domestic currency. Step 2: Recognize that higher domestic prices relative to foreign prices tend to make exports less competitive and can encourage imports. Step 3: Understand that this relative price effect often leads to downward pressure on the domestic currency, causing depreciation in foreign exchange markets. Step 4: Compare the options and choose the one that correctly states that the domestic currency tends to depreciate under inflationary pressure. Verification / Alternative check: A simple way to check is to think of purchasing power parity ideas. If domestic prices are rising faster than foreign prices, the exchange rate usually adjusts so that the domestic currency can buy fewer foreign goods, which shows up as depreciation. This is consistent with option A and inconsistent with statements that suggest the domestic currency becomes stronger or that fixed interest asset holders gain in real terms. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Exports become more competitive and imports become cheaper: Under higher domestic inflation, exports generally become less competitive and imports often appear cheaper in real terms, so this statement reverses the usual relationship. The cost of borrowing falls sharply: Central banks often raise nominal policy rates in response to inflation, so the nominal cost of borrowing usually increases rather than decreases. Bondholders gain in real terms: Holders of fixed interest securities typically suffer because inflation erodes the real value of fixed coupon payments and principal. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes assume that inflation is automatically good for borrowers and bad for lenders without considering how interest rates adjust. They may also confuse nominal and real variables, forgetting that bondholders care about purchasing power, not just the money amount. Another mistake is to think that inflation strengthens a currency, when in fact persistent inflation relative to other countries usually leads to depreciation in the long run. Final Answer: When an economy is under sustained inflationary pressure, the most likely outcome is that the domestic currency tends to depreciate in foreign exchange markets.

Question 16

In the context of economic development, capital deepening refers to which of the following situations?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Capital deepening is a key term in development economics and growth theory. It helps explain how increasing the amount of capital available for each worker can raise productivity and output per head. Understanding this concept is important for interpreting discussions about investment, technology, and long term economic growth. This question requires you to select the description that best matches the idea of capital deepening. Given Data / Assumptions: We are concerned with the relationship between capital and labour in production. Capital refers mainly to physical or fixed capital, such as machinery, tools, and equipment. Labour refers to the workforce engaged in production. The question is about what changes when capital deepening occurs. Concept / Approach: Capital deepening occurs when the amount of capital per worker increases. This can happen through higher investment, better technology, or replacement of old equipment with more advanced machines. When each worker has more or better capital to work with, labour productivity tends to rise, which can support higher wages and improved living standards. This is conceptually different from simply adding more workers while keeping capital constant, which is often called capital widening. It also differs from changes in ratios like capital output ratio if there is no increase in capital per worker. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the wording “capital deepening” and relate it to capital per worker. Step 2: Recall that deepening means making something more intense or greater in depth, here meaning more capital for each unit of labour. Step 3: Identify the option that clearly states an increase in fixed capital per worker. Step 4: Confirm that this description matches standard textbook definitions of capital deepening. Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to compare capital deepening with capital widening. Capital widening generally refers to adding capital just enough to maintain a given capital labour ratio when the labour force grows. Deepening, in contrast, refers to increasing the capital labour ratio itself. Option A captures this idea by explicitly stating more fixed capital per worker, confirming it as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Emphasis on social overhead capital: While infrastructure is important, simply investing in roads and bridges does not by itself define capital deepening unless it increases capital per worker across the economy. Constant capital output ratio: This indicates a stable relationship between capital and output, but does not directly tell us about capital per worker, so it is not the definition of capital deepening. Increasing capital output ratio: A rising capital output ratio can even suggest less efficient use of capital, and again does not necessarily describe more capital per worker. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse capital deepening with any form of investment or with general infrastructure development. Another pitfall is to focus on macro ratios like the capital output ratio without relating them back to what each worker has at their disposal. Always remember that capital deepening is specifically about raising the amount and quality of capital per worker, which is central to long term productivity growth. Final Answer: Capital deepening refers to going for more fixed capital per worker in the production process.

Question 17

In the standard law of demand, which of the following is not an assumption underlying the inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The law of demand states that, other things being equal, the quantity demanded of a good falls when its price rises and rises when its price falls. For this inverse relationship to hold, certain assumptions must remain unchanged. Exam questions often test whether you can distinguish these standard assumptions from other real world influences that are deliberately excluded. This question focuses on identifying which listed condition is not part of the usual ceteris paribus assumptions for the law of demand. Given Data / Assumptions: We are discussing the individual or market demand for a good. The law of demand requires “other things” to remain constant. Key factors include income, tastes, and prices of related goods. We must pick the statement that does not fit these standard assumptions. Concept / Approach: The law of demand is derived under ceteris paribus conditions which include constant income, constant tastes and preferences, and constant prices of related goods such as substitutes and complements. If any of these factors change, the entire demand curve shifts, and we can no longer attribute changes in quantity demanded solely to changes in the price of the good itself. The “demonstration effect” refers to consumers changing their consumption patterns because they observe the consumption of others, which is not a standard assumption in the basic formulation of the law of demand. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the main ceteris paribus assumptions: income, tastes, and prices of related goods remain unchanged. Step 2: Examine each option to see whether it matches one of these standard assumptions. Step 3: Recognize that constant income and constant tastes are classic assumptions, as is no change in the prices of substitute goods. Step 4: Identify “consumers are affected by demonstration effect” as a behavioural influence that is not part of the basic ceteris paribus conditions. Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to recall how demand curves are drawn in introductory textbooks. The demand curve shows quantity demanded at various prices, holding income, tastes, and prices of related goods constant. There is no mention of demonstration effect in that basic framework. Demonstration effect would actually introduce changes in tastes over time, leading to shifts in the demand curve, which violates the assumption of no change in preferences. Why Other Options Are Wrong: No changes in taste and preferences: This is a standard assumption to ensure that the demand curve does not shift while we study price changes. Income of consumers remains constant: This is also a classic assumption because changes in income shift the demand curve and would confuse the pure price effect. No changes in the price of substitute goods: This is necessary because changes in substitute prices alter demand for the good, again shifting the curve rather than moving along it. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think that any realistic factor affecting demand must be an assumption of the law of demand. In fact, many real world influences, including advertising, social norms, and demonstration effects, are deliberately held constant or excluded to keep the theory simple. The law of demand is about the relationship between price and quantity demanded under controlled conditions, not about every possible behavioural influence. Final Answer: The condition that is not an assumption of the standard law of demand is that consumers are affected by demonstration effect.

Question 18

Which one of the following statements about total utility and marginal utility is not correct according to the law of diminishing marginal utility?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In microeconomic theory of consumer behaviour, total utility and marginal utility are used to explain how satisfaction changes as a consumer consumes more units of a good. The law of diminishing marginal utility is a fundamental principle that describes how marginal utility typically falls as consumption increases. This question asks you to identify which given statement about the relationship between total utility and marginal utility is not correct. Given Data / Assumptions: Total utility is the sum of satisfaction from all units consumed. Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction from one more unit of the good. The law of diminishing marginal utility is assumed to hold. Average utility is total utility divided by the number of units consumed. Concept / Approach: According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, as a consumer consumes more units of a good, the marginal utility obtained from each additional unit generally decreases. Total utility rises as long as marginal utility is positive, reaches a maximum when marginal utility becomes zero, and starts falling when marginal utility becomes negative. Average utility, however, does not necessarily equal marginal utility when total utility is at its maximum. Instead, at the point of maximum total utility, marginal utility is zero while average utility is positive and less than its earlier peak value. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that when total utility is increasing, marginal utility must be positive, since each extra unit still adds to total satisfaction. Step 2: Remember that when total utility is decreasing, marginal utility is negative, because the extra unit reduces total satisfaction. Step 3: Understand that total utility is maximized at the point where marginal utility becomes zero, after which further consumption lowers total utility. Step 4: Recognize that at maximum total utility, marginal utility is zero while average utility is still positive, so they are not equal to each other at that point. Verification / Alternative check: You can sketch a simple numerical example. Suppose marginal utility values for successive units decline from 10 to 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, and then negative values. Total utility is the cumulative sum and peaks when marginal utility becomes zero. At that unit, average utility is total utility divided by the number of units, which remains positive. Marginal utility is zero. Since average utility is positive and not zero, they cannot be equal at the maximum of total utility, confirming that the statement claiming equality is incorrect. Why Other Options Are Wrong: When total utility is maximum, marginal utility is zero: This is correct and comes directly from the relationship between total and marginal utility. When total utility is decreasing, marginal utility is negative: This is also correct, because a negative marginal utility means each additional unit reduces total satisfaction. When total utility is increasing, marginal utility is positive: This is correct, since total utility can only increase when each extra unit adds positive utility. Common Pitfalls: A frequent confusion is between average and marginal concepts. Students sometimes think that at a maximum point for total utility, both marginal and average utility must be equal or must both be zero. This is not true. Marginal utility is zero at the maximum of total utility, but average utility can still be positive. Another pitfall is ignoring the sign of marginal utility when total utility begins to fall; remembering that negative marginal utility pulls total utility down helps avoid that error. Final Answer: The statement that is not correct is that when total utility is maximum, marginal and average utility are equal to each other.

Question 19

Regarding indifference curves in consumer theory, which of the following statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Indifference curves are an important tool in modern microeconomics for analyzing consumer preferences and choices. Each indifference curve represents combinations of two goods that give a consumer the same level of satisfaction. This question lists three statements about indifference curves and asks which are correct. You must recall both the shape and properties of indifference curves and the rule that they cannot intersect if preferences are consistent. Given Data / Assumptions: Statement 1: Indifference curves are convex to the origin. Statement 2: A higher indifference curve represents a higher level of satisfaction. Statement 3: Two indifference curves cut each other. Consumer is rational, with consistent and transitive preferences. Concept / Approach: Under usual assumptions, indifference curves are downward sloping and convex to the origin because of diminishing marginal rate of substitution. Convexity reflects a preference for balanced bundles over extreme ones. A higher indifference curve means that at least one good is in greater quantity while the other is not less, so it represents a higher utility level. Indifference curves for a given consumer cannot intersect; if they did, it would violate the transitivity and consistency of preferences, because one point would then appear to provide both higher and lower satisfaction at the same time. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Evaluate Statement 1. Indifference curves are generally convex to the origin due to diminishing marginal rate of substitution, so Statement 1 is correct. Step 2: Evaluate Statement 2. A higher indifference curve is further from the origin and reflects a bundle with more of at least one good without less of the other, so it represents a higher satisfaction level. Statement 2 is correct. Step 3: Evaluate Statement 3. If two indifference curves intersected, the common point would have the same satisfaction as two different curves which represent different satisfaction levels, which is inconsistent. Therefore, Statement 3 is incorrect. Step 4: Combine the results. Only Statements 1 and 2 are correct, so the correct choice is “1 and 2”. Verification / Alternative check: You can visualize typical indifference curves in the quantity of good X on the horizontal axis and quantity of good Y on the vertical axis. For a rational consumer, higher curves are outward and to the right of lower curves. If you try to draw two curves that intersect, you will find that the assumption that more of a good is preferred to less is violated at some points, confirming that intersection is not allowed. This supports the conclusion that only the first two statements are correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1 only: This ignores the fact that higher indifference curves do represent higher satisfaction, so it is incomplete. 2 and 3: This incorrectly assumes that indifference curves can cut each other, which contradicts basic theory. 3 only: This is clearly wrong, because the third statement itself is incorrect and the first two are correct. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is to forget the rule that higher indifference curves imply higher utility and to treat all curves as equivalent. Another pitfall is to think that curves can intersect like simple graphs, ignoring the implications for preference consistency. Remember that the entire indifference curve represents the same satisfaction level, and curves for different levels must never cross if the consumer is rational and preferences are transitive. Final Answer: The correct combination is that Statements 1 and 2 are true, while Statement 3 is false, so the answer is “1 and 2”.

Question 20

Consider the features of a joint stock company. Which of the following statements about such a company are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: A joint stock company is one of the most important forms of business organization, especially for large scale enterprises. Competitive examinations often ask about its key features to test your understanding of business structures, corporate law, and economic organization. This question lists four statements and requires you to identify which correctly describe a joint stock company. Given Data / Assumptions: Statement 1: It has a legal existence. Statement 2: There is limited liability of shareholders. Statement 3: It has a democratic management. Statement 4: It has a collective ownership. We assume a standard company registered under the Companies Act. Concept / Approach: A joint stock company is a separate legal entity distinct from its shareholders. It can own property, enter contracts, sue, and be sued in its own name. Shareholders enjoy limited liability, meaning their risk is generally limited to the amount unpaid on their shares. Management is democratic in the sense that shareholders elect a board of directors through voting, usually on a one share one vote basis. Ownership is collective because many shareholders together own the company by holding its shares, while day to day management is handled by directors and managers on behalf of all owners. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check Statement 1. A joint stock company has a separate legal existence, so this is correct. Step 2: Check Statement 2. Limited liability is a defining feature of companies; shareholders are not personally liable beyond their investment, so this is correct. Step 3: Check Statement 3. Management is democratic because shareholders participate in decision making through voting at general meetings and electing directors, so this is correct. Step 4: Check Statement 4. Ownership is collective, since many shareholders jointly own the firm by holding shares, so this statement is also correct. Step 5: Since all four statements are correct, the right option must include 1, 2, 3 and 4. Verification / Alternative check: You can quickly cross check against any standard definition of a joint stock company. All definitions highlight separate legal entity status, limited liability, separation of ownership and management, and broad based ownership through shares. There is no conflicting feature among the four statements, which confirms that they are all correct and form a consistent description of a joint stock company. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1 and 2 only: This ignores the democratic management and collective ownership, which are also correct features. 1, 2 and 3 only: This drops collective ownership, even though it is a natural consequence of shareholding by many investors. 3 and 4 only: This omits the crucial features of legal existence and limited liability, so it is incomplete. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think that democratic management requires equal voting power for each person, which would make them doubt Statement 3. In joint stock companies, democracy is based on shareholding, not equal head count, but it is still considered a democratic form of control. Another pitfall is failing to appreciate the distinction between the company as a legal person and its shareholders as separate individuals. Remember that this separation is fundamental to the company form. Final Answer: All four statements correctly describe a joint stock company, so the correct answer is 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Indian Economy Questions