Statement — “As we globalise, economics drives political relationships, not the other way around. That is what is happening between India and the US.” Conclusions: I. Indo-US relationships are improving. II. Trade between India and the US is diminishing.

Introduction / Context:The speaker asserts that economic linkages are shaping political ties, and cites India–US relations as an example. We evaluate which conclusion is forced by this claim.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Economic engagement is the driver of political alignment.
• This dynamic is stated to be occurring between India and the US.

Concept / Approach:If economics is driving the relationship, we infer increasing engagement and alignment (improvement). There is no basis to claim that trade is diminishing; in fact, the remark suggests the opposite trend.

Step-by-Step Solution:1) “Economics drives” → more trade/investment ties → warmer political posture.2) Therefore I follows; II contradicts the drift of the statement.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only II/Either/Both: conflict with the stated economic-political trajectory. Neither: ignores a clear positive inference about ties.

Common Pitfalls:Equating temporary disputes with long-term trajectory; the statement speaks to the overarching driver.

Final Answer:Only conclusion I follows.