Question 1

Reference points on the Réaumur temperature scale: What are the ice point and steam point (fixed points) on the Réaumur scale?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Several historical temperature scales predate or coexist with Celsius and Fahrenheit. The Réaumur scale, though largely obsolete, still appears in older literature and instrumentation. Recognizing its fixed reference points aids in conversions and interpretation of legacy data. Given Data / Assumptions: Réaumur scale divides the interval between freezing and boiling of water into 80 equal parts. Standard atmospheric pressure is assumed. “Ice point” denotes equilibrium of ice–water; “steam point” denotes equilibrium of water–steam. Concept / Approach: On the Réaumur scale, ice point is 0°Ré and steam point is 80°Ré, by definition. This contrasts with Celsius (0° and 100°) and Fahrenheit (32° and 212°). Conversions follow linear relationships using these anchor points. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall definition: 0°Ré at freezing, 80°Ré at boiling.Map to choices: the pair 0° and 80° matches Réaumur.Select 0° and 80° as correct. Verification / Alternative check: Historical thermometry references and conversion formulas confirm these fixed points. Why Other Options Are Wrong: −273° & 80°: mixes absolute zero with Réaumur; incorrect pairing.32° & 460°: mix of Fahrenheit freezing and Rankine boiling-interval figure; not Réaumur.32° & 80°: blends Fahrenheit freezing with Réaumur boiling; inconsistent. Common Pitfalls: Confusing Réaumur with Celsius or Fahrenheit in old engineering tables; always verify the units symbol (°Ré). Final Answer: 0° and 80°

Question 2

Instrumentation classification: Which of the following is not a composition-measuring instrument used for gas or liquid analysis?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Process analyzers measure composition to ensure quality, safety, and control. Common technologies include thermal conductivity, mass spectrometry, electrochemical methods, and spectroscopies. Distinguishing true composition analyzers from flow/velocity instruments avoids misapplication. Given Data / Assumptions: We are considering instruments commonly used in process or lab environments. “Composition-measuring” means reporting concentration or species identity/ratio. All options are real instruments but have different primary functions. Concept / Approach: A thermal conductivity cell measures bulk gas composition by relating conductivity to species fractions (e.g., binary mixtures like H2/N2). A mass spectrometer separates ions by mass-to-charge, providing highly resolved composition. A polarograph (voltammetry) measures current–potential behavior to quantify electroactive species. A hot wire anemometer, however, measures fluid velocity by heat transfer from a heated wire; it does not directly report chemical composition. Step-by-Step Solution: Classify each instrument by its measurement principle.Identify which does not produce composition information.Select “Hot wire anemometer.” Verification / Alternative check: Manufacturer datasheets and textbooks list hot wire anemometers under velocity/flow diagnostics, not analyzers. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Thermal conductivity cell: classic binary gas analyzer.Mass spectrometer: definitive multi-component analyzer.Polarograph: electroanalytical concentration measurement of redox-active species. Common Pitfalls: Assuming any “electrical output” device measures composition; many sensors output signals for non-compositional variables like flow or temperature. Final Answer: Hot wire anemometer

Question 3

Mercury thermometer usage limits: For low-temperature measurement, what are the approximate freezing point and boiling point of mercury in °C that bound the useful range of a mercury-in-glass thermometer?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Mercury-in-glass thermometers are traditional contact thermometers. Their usable range is fundamentally limited by the physical properties of mercury: freezing near −38.8 °C and boiling near 356.7 °C at 1 atm. Knowledge of these limits prevents misuse and breakage. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard atmospheric pressure conditions. Rounded choices approximating physical constants. Typical laboratory thermometers without special pressurization. Concept / Approach: Because mercury freezes around −39 °C, measurements below this temperature require alternative fills (e.g., alcohol, toluene) or platinum resistance thermometers. Boiling near 357 °C limits upper range unless the bulb is pressurized; most common mercury thermometers therefore top out around 350 °C. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall mercury freezing ≈ −38.8 °C → rounded to −39 °C.Recall mercury boiling ≈ 356.7 °C → rounded to about 350 °C in common instruments.Select the pair closest to these values. Verification / Alternative check: Materials data and instrument catalogs specify −39 °C and ≈ 357 °C; answer choice (−39, 350) reflects practical range limits. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Other pairs substantially deviate from mercury’s true phase-change points. Common Pitfalls: Using mercury thermometers at sub-zero temperatures where the column may fracture or separate; also environmental restrictions on mercury require safer alternatives. Final Answer: -39 and 350

Question 4

Sub-zero temperature measurement: Which instrument from the list is generally not used for measuring temperatures below 0 °C (sub-zero work) under typical laboratory conditions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Choosing the right temperature sensor for sub-zero work depends on the sensor’s physical limitations and accuracy. While several devices function well below 0 °C, mercury-in-glass thermometers are constrained by the freezing point of mercury and are therefore unsuitable without special modifications. Given Data / Assumptions: Temperature to be measured is below 0 °C. Standard, unpressurized mercury thermometers. Standard lab alternatives such as platinum resistance thermometers (PRTs), vapor-pressure thermometers, and non-contact methods are available. Concept / Approach: Mercury freezes at about −38.8 °C, and even near 0 to −10 °C mercury thermometers can suffer from column separation, wetting issues, and slow response. For reliable sub-zero measurements, PRTs (e.g., Pt100) remain accurate down to −200 °C; vapor-pressure thermometers with appropriate fluids function below 0 °C; radiation pyrometers can read cold surfaces if emissivity is known, though they are less common for low temperatures due to low radiance. Step-by-Step Solution: Assess each instrument’s low-temperature capability.Recognize mercury limitations and risks below 0 °C.Select mercury-in-glass as the option generally not used for sub-zero temperatures. Verification / Alternative check: Instrument datasheets confirm PRT operation to deep sub-zero temperatures; many vapor-pressure devices use propane or other fluids for low ranges. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Platinum resistance thermometer: excellent precision below 0 °C.Vapor-pressure thermometer: selection of fill fluid allows sub-zero operation.Radiation pyrometer: can measure cold surfaces with proper calibration and emissivity knowledge. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring self-heating in PRTs or emissivity errors in pyrometry; always calibrate and account for environmental factors. Final Answer: Mercury-in-glass thermometer

Question 5

Measuring very high dome temperature in a blast-furnace hot-blast stove Which instrument provides the most accurate, reliable indication at the stove dome, where temperatures are extremely high and direct contact is impractical?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Blast-furnace stoves (hot-blast stoves) operate with dome temperatures that can exceed 1000°C. Selecting the right temperature instrument is critical because extreme heat, combustion gases, and radiant energy make many contact sensors inaccurate or short-lived. This question checks your understanding of non-contact high-temperature measurement principles. Given Data / Assumptions: Measurement location: stove dome of a blast-furnace hot-blast stove. Very high temperatures (well above typical contact sensor comfort zones). Goal: maximize accuracy and reliability without direct immersion. Concept / Approach: Radiation (optical) pyrometers determine temperature from the thermal radiation emitted by a hot surface according to radiation laws. Because they are non-contact, they avoid problems like sensor drift due to oxidation, sheath failure, and conduction errors. Thermocouples can measure high temperatures, but survivability and reference errors increase in harsh, radiative environments. Resistance thermometers (e.g., platinum RTDs) are excellent at moderate temperatures but are unsuitable at such high values. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the temperature regime: > 1000°C at a radiant dome.Screen options by survivability: RTDs and iron–constantan thermocouples are eliminated.Compare high-temperature options: noble-metal thermocouples vs. radiation pyrometers.Select radiation pyrometer for highest accuracy without contact at very high temperature. Verification / Alternative check: Plant practice often uses optical/radiation pyrometers for stove domes and molten streams. When emissivity is accounted for and sighting is sound, these instruments deliver accurate, repeatable results. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Platinum–platinum/rhodium thermocouple — workable at high temperature but subject to drift, contamination, and contact placement issues.Iron–constantan thermocouple — temperature range too limited; oxidation risk is high.Platinum resistance thermometer — typically limited to much lower temperatures than the dome experiences. Common Pitfalls: Assuming any thermocouple equals “best” for high temperature. At very high temperatures and in radiant environments, non-contact methods often yield better accuracy and sensor life. Final Answer: radiation pyrometer

Question 6

Extending the range of a mercury-in-glass thermometer with pressurized nitrogen Ordinary mercury thermometers read up to about 120°C. When nitrogen is filled above the mercury under pressure to suppress evaporation and prevent thread breakage, up to…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Liquid-in-glass thermometers are simple and robust, but mercury begins to evaporate and the column can break at high temperatures. Filling dry nitrogen above the mercury under pressure suppresses evaporation and stabilizes the column, enabling an extended temperature range for industrial duty. Given Data / Assumptions: Ordinary mercury-in-glass range ≈ up to 120°C. Nitrogen is added above the mercury, under pressure. We seek the typical upper temperature limit achieved by this modification. Concept / Approach: Pressurizing the space above the mercury raises the boiling point and curbs vapor formation. It also reduces the risk of a broken mercury thread by applying a stabilizing pressure. With suitable glass and construction, industrial “gas-pressure filled” mercury thermometers commonly reach into the 300–350°C region with reliable readings. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize problem: mercury vapor and thread breaks limit the upper range.Apply mitigation: nitrogen pressurization.Recall practical industry limit: around 350°C for such designs. Verification / Alternative check: Manufacturers’ catalogs list nitrogen-filled mercury thermometers with upper ranges around 300–360°C depending on stem and bulb design, confirming 350°C as a representative value. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 250°C — too conservative; pressurized designs typically go higher.550°C, 700°C — far beyond standard mercury-in-glass capabilities; glass and mercury constraints dominate. Common Pitfalls: Confusing gas-filled “remote” bulb instruments (which can indicate higher temperatures via filled systems) with a simple mercury column thermometer; here we discuss nitrogen above the mercury in a direct-reading glass thermometer. Final Answer: 350

Question 7

Manometer measurement principle A standard U-tube or differential manometer is primarily used to indicate which form of pressure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Manometers are foundational instruments in fluid mechanics labs and process plants. They balance a column of fluid against an applied pressure, letting us compare an unknown pressure to a known reference, most commonly the ambient atmosphere. Given Data / Assumptions: Instrument: U-tube or differential manometer. Reference leg often open to atmosphere. Working fluid: mercury, water, or manometer oil. Concept / Approach: A manometer indicates pressure relative to its reference leg. If the reference is the atmosphere (open leg), the reading is pressure above or below atmospheric pressure — i.e., gauge pressure. Absolute pressure requires an absolute reference (perfect vacuum) as in a barometer; differential pressure uses two process taps. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify reference: open to air ⇒ atmospheric baseline.Compute indicated value: P_device − P_atm ⇒ gauge pressure.Conclude: a standard manometer reads gauge (or differential) pressure, not absolute. Verification / Alternative check: In a barometer, one side is vacuum, so it reads absolute atmospheric pressure. In contrast, a process manometer against atmosphere reads gauge pressure by definition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Atmospheric — that is a barometer’s role, not a generic manometer tied to a process tap.Absolute — requires a vacuum reference; ordinary manometers do not provide this.None of these — incorrect because “gauge” precisely matches standard practice. Common Pitfalls: Treating all column devices as “absolute.” The reference connection defines whether the indication is gauge, differential, or absolute. Final Answer: gauge

Question 8

Identifying thermocouple type from EMF at high temperature If a thermocouple develops about 31 mV at 800°C (hot junction), which common thermocouple type is most consistent with this EMF?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Each thermocouple pair exhibits a characteristic electromotive force (EMF) versus temperature. By comparing a measured EMF at a specified temperature with standard tables, one can infer the thermocouple type. This is useful for maintenance and troubleshooting when markings are missing. Given Data / Assumptions: Measured EMF: ≈ 31 mV at 800°C. Standard cold junction assumption: near 0°C (typical for tabulated values). Common industrial types considered: K (chromel–alumel), J (iron–constantan), S/R (platinum–platinum rhodium). Concept / Approach: Type K yields roughly 33 mV at 800°C; Type J is typically higher (around the low 40 mV range), while noble-metal Types S/R provide much smaller EMFs (roughly 9–12 mV in this region). A value near 31 mV aligns best with Type K, considering typical tolerances and reference junction conditions. Step-by-Step Solution: Compare 31 mV with standard charts for Type K, J, and S/R.Observe proximity: 31 mV is near Type K expected value at 800°C.Conclude the thermocouple is most consistent with chromel–alumel (Type K). Verification / Alternative check: Cross-check with manufacturer tables: Type K around 33 mV at 800°C; Type J significantly higher; Type S/R much lower. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Iron–constantan (J) — EMF is generally higher at 800°C.Platinum–platinum rhodium — EMF is much lower; not compatible with 31 mV.None of these — invalid because Type K fits well. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring cold-junction temperature compensation; small differences are expected if the actual reference is not at 0°C, but the order-of-magnitude differences still distinguish types. Final Answer: chromel–alumel (Type K)

Question 9

Continuous measurement of specific gravity (relative density) of a liquid in process Which option correctly lists instruments that can continuously indicate specific gravity in-line or on-stream?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Specific gravity (relative density) is a critical quality parameter for acids, brines, beverages, and petroleum fractions. Plants often require continuous indication to alarm, log, and control blending operations. Knowing which instruments can deliver on-stream density readings is essential for correct selection. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal: continuous (not handheld) measurement. Candidate instruments: hydrometer-based designs, displacement meters, contact-type electric indicators. We consider practical plant implementations. Concept / Approach: While a handheld hydrometer is a spot-check tool, “continuous indicating hydrometers” exist as float or sinker devices in slipstreams or chambers, providing an ongoing reading. Displacement meters (e.g., float-operated displacer/density cells or vibrating element density meters, historically referred to broadly) provide true continuous, in-line signals. “Contact-type electric indicators” is an ambiguous category and is not a standard name for continuous density measurement devices. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize continuous hydrometer variants: float/sinker types in bypass lines.Identify displacement principle: buoyancy force relates to density, enabling continuous output.Select instruments that are actually used on-stream: hydrometer (continuous forms) and displacement meter. Verification / Alternative check: Process instrumentation vendors list continuous indicating hydrometers and displacer density meters for pipelines and tanks; these are standard solutions for specific gravity monitoring. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Hydrometer alone — possible for continuous variants, but the question asks for correct listing; including displacement meters is more complete.Contact-type electric indicators — not a standard, specific device name for density; overly vague.Displacement meter alone — valid but not the complete correct pair per the options provided. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “hydrometer” only means handheld glass; continuous floating-sinker arrangements exist and are used industrially. Final Answer: both (a) and (c)

Question 10

Compute the Laplace transform of sin t (assume unilateral transform and zero initial conditions).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Laplace transform converts time-domain signals to the s-domain, simplifying differential equations to algebraic forms. Trigonometric inputs such as sin t and cos t are classics, and remembering their transforms is essential for solving control and circuit problems quickly. Given Data / Assumptions: Function: f(t) = sin t for t ≥ 0. Unilateral Laplace transform definition is used. Zero initial conditions; standard transform tables apply. Concept / Approach: The standard Laplace transform of sin(ω t) is ω / (s^2 + ω^2). Setting ω = 1 yields 1 / (s^2 + 1). This can also be derived via integration using Euler’s identities or by differentiating the transform of cos t with respect to s. Step-by-Step Solution: Use identity: L{sin(ω t)} = ω / (s^2 + ω^2).Set ω = 1 ⇒ L{sin t} = 1 / (s^2 + 1).Confirm dimensions: numerator is frequency (1), denominator is quadratic in s. Verification / Alternative check: Differentiate the transform pair L{cos t} = s / (s^2 + 1) with respect to s and apply relationships between sin and cos to reconfirm the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: s / (s^2 + 1) — this is the transform of cos t, not sin t.1 / (s + 1) and s / (s + 1) — correspond to exponential or step-related transforms, not sinusoidal functions. Common Pitfalls: Swapping the transforms of sin t and cos t; remember sin has numerator ω, cos has numerator s. Final Answer: 1 / (s^2 + 1)

Question 11

Measuring temperatures of molten pig iron (≈1450°C) and molten slag (≈1500°C) Which instrument(s) is/are appropriate under steelmaking conditions without inserting a sensor into the stream?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Measuring the temperature of molten metal and slag in ironmaking/steelmaking requires non-contact instruments. The intense heat, splashing, and corrosive environment make immersion sensors impractical except for specialized disposable probes. Non-contact pyrometry is the standard solution. Given Data / Assumptions: Molten pig iron: ~1450°C; molten slag: ~1500°C. Desire non-contact, line-of-sight measurement. Industrial setting with hot surfaces and variable emissivity. Concept / Approach: Both optical and radiation pyrometers infer temperature from emitted thermal radiation. The terms are often used interchangeably; “optical” historically refers to brightness or disappearing-filament types, while “radiation” may emphasize total or narrow-band radiance. In either case, non-contact sighting at these temperatures is accurate and safe when emissivity and surface conditions are managed. Step-by-Step Solution: Eliminate contact options that cannot survive immersion in molten streams.Select non-contact methods that work at >1400°C: optical or radiation pyrometry.Conclude that either (b) or (c) is suitable. Verification / Alternative check: Steel plants routinely use optical/radiation pyrometers aimed at the tap stream or molten bath to monitor temperature, often alongside occasional disposable immersion thermocouples for cross-checks. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chromel–alumel thermocouple — contact method; not practical for continuous non-contact measurement in molten metal streams. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring emissivity and viewing window cleanliness; proper calibration and sighting are required for accurate readings. Final Answer: either (b) or (c)

Question 12

Bode plot paper choice for magnitude plotting In standard Bode diagrams, the amplitude ratio (or magnitude in dB) is plotted versus frequency ω on what type of graph paper?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Bode plots are frequency-response tools widely used in control and electronics. They present magnitude and phase as functions of frequency. Understanding the axes scales is essential to interpret slope rules, corner frequencies, and asymptotes correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: Amplitude ratio (or magnitude in dB) vs frequency ω. Standard Bode magnitude plot conventions. No special modifications (e.g., Nichols charts). Concept / Approach: The Bode magnitude plot uses a logarithmic frequency axis and a linear magnitude axis (often in dB). This corresponds to a semi-log graph (log scale on the x-axis, linear scale on the y-axis). The log frequency axis spreads decades evenly and simplifies reading of slopes and breakpoints. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify axes: frequency ⇒ log scale; magnitude (dB) ⇒ linear scale.Match to paper type: semi-log.Confirm compatibility with straight-line asymptotes and decade spacing. Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks depict Bode magnitude on semi-log grids; phase plots also use the same log frequency axis with linear phase on the vertical axis. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Log–log — used for other plotting styles (e.g., power laws) but not the standard Bode magnitude layout.Ordinary linear–linear — does not compress the large frequency span effectively.Triangular — not a standard engineering graph paper type. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “log–log” with “semi-log.” Remember: Bode uses a log scale only on the frequency axis. Final Answer: semi-log

Question 13

Stroboscope application in rotating machinery A stroboscope is commonly used in industry to measure which quantity without mechanical contact?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: A stroboscope emits flashes of light at a controllable frequency. When this frequency synchronizes with a rotating object’s apparent motion, the object appears stationary. This visual “freezing” enables non-contact speed measurements on shafts, fans, and flywheels — a staple of maintenance and balancing work. Given Data / Assumptions: Instrument: portable electronic stroboscope. Rotating target with a visible mark or blade. No physical tachometer pickup is used. Concept / Approach: Adjust flash rate until the mark appears stationary. The flash frequency at that point corresponds to the rotational frequency (allowing for harmonics). Converting from flashes per second to revolutions per minute is straightforward: rpm = 60 * flashes per second (for the fundamental stationary image). Step-by-Step Solution: Place a reflective mark on the rim of the flywheel.Aim the stroboscope and vary flash rate until the mark freezes.Read the flash rate and compute rpm considering possible harmonic aliasing. Verification / Alternative check: Cross-check the displayed rpm with a contact tachometer or a laser optical tach; readings match when the fundamental stationary image (not a harmonic) is used. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Frequency of light — a stroboscope sets flash repetition rate, not the optical carrier frequency.Depression of freezing point — a thermodynamic property measured by cryoscopy, not by strobes.Liquid level under pressure — measured by differential pressure, radar, or floats. Common Pitfalls: Misreading harmonic locks (e.g., 2×, 3×). Always verify by checking multiple flash rates and ensuring the mark’s apparent position and count are consistent. Final Answer: rpm of a flywheel

Question 14

Measuring minute depression of the freezing point (cryoscopy) Which instrument is best suited to detect and measure very small changes in freezing point when a solute is added to a solvent?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Cryoscopy relies on measuring small decreases in a solvent’s freezing point upon adding a solute, allowing estimation of molar mass and colligative properties. The measurement demands a high-resolution thermometer designed specifically for tiny temperature changes, often only a few hundredths of a degree. Given Data / Assumptions: Objective: detect minute freezing point depressions. Resolution required: hundredths of a degree Celsius or better. Laboratory context with careful stirring and supercooling control. Concept / Approach: The Beckmann thermometer features an adjustable mercury index and a restricted scale, typically spanning about 5–6°C, providing fine resolution for small temperature differences. It is the classic instrument for cryoscopy and ebullioscopy (boiling point elevation) experiments in physical chemistry. Step-by-Step Solution: Prepare pure solvent and measure its freezing point with the Beckmann thermometer.Add solute of known mass and allow the system to equilibrate.Measure the new freezing point; compute depression ΔT_f.Use ΔT_f with the cryoscopic constant to estimate molar mass if needed: M = (K_f * m_solute) / (ΔT_f * m_solvent). Verification / Alternative check: Repeating measurements and correcting for supercooling yields consistent ΔT_f. The Beckmann’s fine scale and adjustable index help eliminate calibration offsets between runs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Dilatometer — measures volume changes, not minute temperature changes.Mercury-in-glass thermometer — general purpose, insufficient resolution for tiny ΔT.Bimetallic thermometer — low precision; intended for industrial monitoring. Common Pitfalls: Failing to account for supercooling and stirring rate, which can distort the apparent freezing point; the Beckmann thermometer helps, but technique remains critical. Final Answer: Beckmann thermometer

Question 15

Thermocouple fundamentals for process instrumentation Which of the following standard thermocouple pairs typically offers the least overall temperature measurement range in practical industrial use?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Thermocouples are robust, inexpensive temperature sensors widely used across chemical plants, refineries, and laboratories. Each thermocouple type (identified by its dissimilar metal pair) has a characteristic usable temperature span determined by its thermoelectric stability, oxidation resistance, drift, and electromotive force output. This question asks which listed pair usually has the smallest practical measurement range in routine service. Given Data / Assumptions: Compare common industrial pairs: Copper–constantan, Iron–constantan, Chromel–alumel, and Platinum–platinum/rhodium. “Least temperature measurement range” refers to the typical recommended usable span in practice, not the absolute laboratory extremes. Ambient-to-moderate and high-temperature capabilities are both relevant. Concept / Approach: Type T (Copper–constantan) is valued for cryogenic and low-temperature applications (roughly from about −200 °C up to near 350 °C) but loses advantage as temperatures climb due to copper oxidation and stability limits. By contrast, Type J (Iron–constantan) extends higher (to around 700–750 °C). Type K (Chromel–alumel) covers a very broad span (to about 1100–1200 °C). Noble-metal Types S/R (Platinum–platinum/rhodium) are used at very high temperatures (to ~1600 °C), though they are seldom used at sub-zero temperatures. Hence, in typical practice, Copper–constantan offers the smallest overall span. Step-by-Step Solution: List usual spans: T (about −200 to 350), J (about −40 to 750), K (about −200 to 1200), S/R (about 0 to 1600).Identify the narrowest commonly recommended range among the options.Conclude Copper–constantan has the least practical span. Verification / Alternative check: Vendor handbooks and standards show these recommended operating ranges; Type T is optimized for low temperatures with a modest upper limit, confirming the conclusion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chromel–alumel: Very broad high-temperature capability. Platinum–platinum/rhodium: Used for very high temperatures; wide span. Iron–constantan: Extends higher than Type T in practice. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “accuracy” or “sensitivity” with “range”; a sensor may be very accurate yet still have a limited temperature span. Final Answer: Copper-constantan

Question 16

Online paper moisture measurement in industry For continuous measurement of the moisture content of paper on a running web, which physical property is most commonly monitored?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Paper machines require tight control of moisture to ensure print quality, caliper stability, curl control, and energy efficiency in dryers. Continuous, non-destructive online sensors are mounted across the web to provide real-time moisture profiles. Understanding which property correlates reliably with moisture helps in selecting and maintaining the correct instruments. Given Data / Assumptions: Measurement must be continuous on a moving paper web. Options include thermal, electrical, and magnetic properties. We consider widely adopted industrial practice. Concept / Approach: The electrical resistance (or, conversely, conductance) of paper changes significantly with moisture because water increases ionic conduction pathways within the fibers. Many continuous sensors therefore use resistance (or capacitance at radio frequency) to infer moisture. Thermal conductivity methods are less common online due to response time and installation complexity, while magnetic susceptibility bears little relation to moisture content in paper fibers. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify which property varies strongly and predictably with water content: electrical resistance.Select the option matching standard industrial practice: measure resistance or capacitance to infer moisture.Confirm that alternatives are less practical or weakly correlated. Verification / Alternative check: Mill experience and vendor datasheets show resistance/capacitance-based moisture meters and microwave/IR sensors as the common choices for online paper moisture monitoring. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Thermal conductivity: Can correlate with moisture but is not the mainstream online method for moving webs. Magnetic susceptibility: Not a primary indicator of water content in paper. None of these: Incorrect because resistance-based systems are widely used. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring temperature compensation; resistance readings require algorithms to correct for paper temperature and basis weight. Final Answer: Electrical resistance through the paper

Question 17

Thermowells and dynamic response of thermocouples A thermowell made of which listed material generally provides the fastest temperature response in service (all else equal, similar geometry and wall thickness)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Thermocouples are often inserted into thermowells to protect them from flow-induced damage, corrosion, or pressure. However, the extra thermal mass and reduced conductivity slow the sensor response. Choosing a thermowell material with favorable thermal properties, while maintaining mechanical integrity, helps achieve faster and more reliable measurements. Given Data / Assumptions: Geometry and wall thickness are assumed comparable. We compare typical engineering materials: steel, glass (Vycor), nichrome, and Inconel. Dominant factors: thermal conductivity, heat capacity, and emissivity affecting time constant. Concept / Approach: Response speed improves with higher thermal conductivity and lower thermal mass. Common steels (including stainless grades) offer substantially higher thermal conductivity than glass and many high-nickel alloys. Vycor glass has low conductivity and higher heat capacity per unit volume, making it relatively slow. Nichrome and Inconel (nickel-based alloys) tend to have lower thermal conductivity than carbon steels. Hence, with comparable geometry, a steel thermowell generally provides the fastest response. Step-by-Step Solution: Compare thermal conductivities qualitatively: steel > Inconel ≈ nichrome > glass.Assume equal geometry; infer lower time constant for higher conductivity material.Select steel as the fastest-response choice. Verification / Alternative check: Instrument design guides recommend minimizing wall thickness, using materials of higher conductivity, and ensuring good insertion length to reduce time constant—consistent with choosing steel over glass or high-nickel alloys. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Vycor (glass): Low conductivity → slow response. Nichrome/Inconel: Durable at high temperature but their conductivities are lower than steels, leading to slower response for equal geometry. Common Pitfalls: Overlooking geometry: tip design, wall thickness, and insertion length often dominate; material choice complements—not replaces—good thermowell design. Final Answer: Steel

Question 18

Mercury-in-glass thermometers The operating principle of a mercury-in-glass thermometer is based primarily on which physical effect?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Mercury-in-glass thermometers are classic devices used for precise temperature measurement over a wide range. Despite the proliferation of electronic sensors, their fundamental operating principle remains a foundational concept in instrumentation courses and laboratory practice. Given Data / Assumptions: The thermometer comprises a capillary tube and a bulb filled with mercury. The scale is calibrated against fixed points or reference instruments. Ambient pressure effects on the column inside the sealed capillary are negligible compared to thermal expansion of mercury. Concept / Approach: Temperature rise causes the volume of mercury to increase significantly more than the glass envelope. The difference in volumetric expansion forces the mercury column to rise in the fine capillary, which is read against a calibrated scale. This is distinct from “pressure-rise” devices (e.g., gas-filled or vapor-pressure thermometers) and from “linear expansion” of solids (e.g., bimetallic strips) that do not rely on a fluid volume change inside a capillary. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize mercury's high volumetric thermal expansion coefficient.Note that glass expands far less, so the mercury level rises in the capillary.Identify the governing principle: volumetric expansion. Verification / Alternative check: Comparison with vapor-pressure thermometers confirms that mercury-in-glass does not rely on bulk pressure change but on column displacement arising from volume difference. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Pressure rise with temperature: Characteristic of gas/vapor-pressure types, not mercury-column thermometers. Linear expansion: Refers to solids like bimetallic elements. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “capillary pressure” with the principle of operation; capillary action helps column stability but the measurement basis is volumetric expansion. Final Answer: Volumetric expansion.

Question 19

Determining natural gas composition in practice Which instrument(s) are typically used to determine the composition of natural gas streams accurately?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Natural gas custody transfer, heating value computation, and emissions reporting require accurate gas composition data. Modern plants rely on instrumental analysis capable of resolving light hydrocarbons and inert/contaminant species at low concentrations with repeatability and speed. Given Data / Assumptions: Stream is a hydrocarbon gas mixture (methane-dominant) possibly containing ethane, propane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, etc. Methods must be suitable for multi-component analysis. Industrial practicality and accuracy are important. Concept / Approach: Gas chromatography (GC) is the industry workhorse for natural gas analysis, separating components by retention time on a packed or capillary column and quantifying with thermal conductivity or flame ionization detectors. Mass spectrometry can also determine composition by ion mass-to-charge ratios and is used in specialized applications or laboratories. The classical Haldane apparatus is intended for flue gases (O2, CO2, CO) and is not suitable for detailed hydrocarbon speciation in natural gas. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify instruments capable of multi-component hydrocarbon analysis: GC and MS.Rule out Haldane as inadequate for detailed hydrocarbon composition.Select “Both (b) and (c)” to capture common practice. Verification / Alternative check: Standards for natural gas (e.g., GPA methods) specify GC for composition and calorific value calculations; MS is recognized in analytical labs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Haldane apparatus: Limited to a few combustion gases, not detailed hydrocarbon breakdown. Common Pitfalls: Confusing flue-gas oxygen/CO2 analysis with hydrocarbon speciation requirements for natural gas billing. Final Answer: Both (b) and (c)

Question 20

Paramagnetic gas property in flue-gas analysis Which listed gas is the strongest paramagnetic species commonly encountered in combustion or process streams?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Paramagnetism—the attraction of a substance toward a magnetic field—forms the basis of certain oxygen analyzers. Understanding which gases are strongly paramagnetic helps interpret analyzer selectivity and avoid cross-sensitivity issues in flue-gas monitoring and safety systems. Given Data / Assumptions: Common combustion and process gases are considered. Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electrons in molecular orbitals. Instrument designs exploit magnetic susceptibility differences. Concept / Approach: Diatomic oxygen (O2) has two unpaired electrons in antibonding orbitals, making it strongly paramagnetic—much stronger than most other common gases. In contrast, carbon dioxide (CO2) is diamagnetic. Nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are also paramagnetic, but their susceptibilities are lower and less consistently exploited for routine measurement than O2. Therefore, oxygen stands out as the strongest paramagnetic gas among the given options. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall electronic structures: O2 possesses unpaired electrons → strong paramagnetism.Compare with CO2 (closed-shell, diamagnetic) and NO/NO2 (paramagnetic but weaker).Select O2 as the strongest paramagnetic gas. Verification / Alternative check: Paramagnetic oxygen analyzers rely on O2's large magnetic susceptibility to physically deflect a measuring element or produce torque, confirming its dominance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: CO2: Diamagnetic; repelled by magnetic fields. NO/NO2: Paramagnetic, but weaker and less universally used for paramagnetic detection than O2. Common Pitfalls: Assuming all oxidizers are strongly paramagnetic; susceptibility depends on electron configuration, not chemical reactivity. Final Answer: O2

Process Control and Instrumentation Questions