Statement–Assumption — “The Net can be for India what oil was for West Asia.” Assumptions: I. Most IT entrepreneurs in the world are Indians. II. India can have a monopoly in the global IT sector.
-
Aif only assumption I is implicit.
-
Bif only assumption II is implicit.
-
Cif either I or II is implicit.
-
Dif neither I nor II is implicit.
-
Eif both I and II is implicit.
Answer
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is implicit.
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The analogy suggests the internet could be a transformative economic driver for India, akin to oil for West Asia. We must locate minimal assumptions required for this analogy to hold.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- The Net has large value-creation potential.
- India can harness significant benefits from the Net.
- No claim about global entrepreneur demographics or monopoly is necessary.
Concept / Approach:Analogies of transformational potential require only that the sector can materially reshape an economy; they do not necessitate majority control or monopoly.
Step-by-Step Solution:1) Assumption I: “Most IT entrepreneurs are Indians” is irrelevant to the analogy; not implicit.2) Assumption II: The claim does not require monopoly—many transformative sectors exist without monopolies. Not implicit.
Verification / Alternative check:Countries can benefit greatly from sectors they do not monopolize (e.g., electronics, services, tourism).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Options implying I or II mistake “scale and impact” for “dominance or exclusivity.”
Common Pitfalls:Reading “like oil” as “monopoly like OPEC dominance,” which the sentence does not entail.
Final Answer:if neither I nor II is implicit.