Cause & Effect — Policy choreography around an investor summit. I. The Chief Minister exhaustively prepared the state capital (beautification, readiness) to welcome investor-summit delegates. II. The state aims to attract industrial investment to foster industrial culture and generate jobs.
-
Aif statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.
-
Bif statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
-
Cif both the statements I and II are independent causes.
-
Dif both the statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: if statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Statements describe a strategic objective (II) and a preparatory action (I). The question is whether the goal to attract investment drives the visible administrative actions ahead of the summit.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- II: Attract industry and jobs via investment.
- I: Intensive city readiness to host delegates (an enabling signal).
- Summits showcase readiness to potential investors.
Concept / Approach:Objectives (II) motivate actions (I). Prepping the capital is an effect in service of the aim of courting investors.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) II → I: The desire to attract investment plausibly and directly causes the preparatory actions.2) I → II would imply the city prep caused the policy objective, which is unlikely; objectives precede tactics.3) Hence, pick B for this format.Verification / Alternative check:If there were no investor objective, such extensive prep would be less justified.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:A reverses causality; C/D claim independence; the pair is clearly linked.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing policy goals with the public-facing operational steps that serve them.
Final Answer:if statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.