A severe cyclonic storm has swept away most parts of a state during the last two days. Which of the following options cannot be a possible effect of this cyclonic storm?

Introduction / Context:
In this effect based reasoning question we are told that a severe cyclonic storm swept away most parts of a state during the last two days. We must identify which listed option cannot reasonably follow as an effect of such a destructive natural event. Cyclonic storms are associated with heavy rain, strong winds, damage to infrastructure, and disruption of daily life. Any option that clearly contradicts these typical consequences is unlikely to be a true effect.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A severe cyclonic storm affected most parts of the state in the last two days.
• Such storms normally bring very strong winds and heavy rainfall.
• They often damage houses, roads, power lines, and communication networks.
• Authorities usually close offices and schools to keep people safe.

Concept / Approach:
The right approach is to compare each option with realistic post disaster situations. Effects that describe heavy rain, damage to homes, or problems in communication networks are fully consistent with what severe cyclones do. On the other hand, any option that describes life going on as usual, especially government orders that everyone must attend offices and schools, would be inconsistent with emergency management practices. Therefore we look for the option that directly conflicts with normal safety responses to such a storm.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Evaluate option A. Heavy rainfall in most parts of the state during a cyclonic storm is natural and expected, so this can easily be an effect.Step 2: Evaluate option B. Severe storms often blow away weak houses and huts, leaving people homeless. So this is also a typical consequence.Step 3: Evaluate option C. High winds and heavy rain frequently damage communication lines and towers, so a paralyzed communication system is again very plausible.Step 4: Evaluate option D. If most parts of the state have just been hit by a severe cyclone, the government normally closes schools and offices or declares holidays, rather than forcing people to travel through unsafe conditions.Step 5: Because option D contradicts usual emergency measures and does not align with the severity of the situation, it cannot be treated as a realistic effect of the given cause.

Verification / Alternative check:
Consider what government priorities are during and immediately after a major natural disaster. Protection of life, rescue, and restoration of essential services come first, while routine work and schooling are often suspended.The idea of keeping all offices and schools open during or right after a severe cyclone would expose citizens to danger from falling trees, floods, and debris. This would be against the usual principles of disaster management.By contrast, more rain, damaged homes, and broken communication networks are standard aftereffects and match the severity described in the cause.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A describes heavy rainfall, which is a direct and obvious result of a cyclonic storm.Option B describes people losing homes due to strong winds, something commonly seen in disaster news reports.Option C refers to communication systems breaking down, another well known effect of storms that damage power and telephone lines.

Common Pitfalls:
One pitfall is to misread the question and search for the most likely effect instead of the option that cannot be an effect. Always note the key word cannot.Another error is to underestimate how seriously authorities respond during disasters and to assume routine operations always continue. In reality, major closures are common.

Final Answer:
The only option that clearly contradicts realistic disaster response is the order to keep all offices and schools open, so the correct choice is The government has ordered that all offices and schools should be kept open.