Statement:\nThe teachers of all degree colleges went on an indefinite strike in protest against the Government's decision to postpone the pay revision to next year.\n\nAssumptions:\nI. The Government may suspend all the striking teachers.\nII. The Government may still revise the pay of college teachers in the current year.\n\nWhich of the above assumptions is implicit in the statement?

Introduction / Context:
When a group protests a policy (here, postponing pay revision), their action presupposes that the decision is reversible, responsive to pressure, or subject to negotiation. We must identify which assumption underlies the teachers’ indefinite strike.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Event: An indefinite strike by college teachers.
• Trigger: Government postponed pay revision to next year.
• Assumption I: Government may suspend all striking teachers.
• Assumption II: Government may revise the pay within the current year (i.e., the postponement can be reconsidered).

Concept / Approach:
A strike is a pressure tactic. It is sensible only if the strikers believe the authority can be persuaded to change course. Fear of suspension is not a necessary belief for initiating a strike; it is a risk, not an underlying rationale.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
If the pay revision could not be advanced under any circumstances, striking would not serve its intended aim. Hence II is the critical assumption.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing risks associated with protest actions with the assumptions behind choosing such actions. The assumption concerns the effectiveness/possibility of change, not punitive outcomes.

Final Answer:
Only Assumption II is implicit.