Statement:\nThe municipal authority has decided to demolish the old bridge on a busy road in order to construct a new flyover.\n\nAssumptions:\nI. The traffic department can divert vehicles through alternate routes during demolition and construction.\nII. People travelling in nearby areas may stage protests against the decision.\n\nWhich of the above assumptions is implicit in the statement?

Introduction / Context:
Major infrastructure work (demolition and flyover construction) on a busy corridor requires a traffic-management plan. “Statement and assumption” problems ask what belief must hold for the decision to be practical. We examine whether diversion capability and protest speculation are necessary presuppositions.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Action: Demolish an old bridge on a busy road to build a flyover.
• Assumption I: Traffic can be diverted via alternate roads during the works.
• Assumption II: People in nearby areas may protest.

Concept / Approach:
Without viable diversions, closing a key structure would paralyze movement and emergency access, making the decision impractical. Thus, assuming the feasibility of traffic diversion is essential. Anticipating protests is not a prerequisite belief; projects proceed based on technical and administrative viability, not on assuming unrest.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Overemphasizing public reaction instead of operational requirements in infrastructure decisions.

Final Answer:
Only Assumption I is implicit.