Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Neither Assumption I nor II is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:In statement–assumption questions, we test what must be believed for a decision to be sensible. Here, the Government levies a Rs 100 toll on a superhighway. We must see whether the decision logically presupposes (assumes) that most vehicles will avoid the road or that costs cannot be recovered.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:To levy a toll, the Government need not assume low usage or cost under-recovery. It may, in fact, expect adequate usage and partial/full cost recovery. Even if cost recovery is uncertain, the act of setting a toll does not require a belief that recovery is impossible.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify necessary beliefs: Users of the road should pay; tolling is an accepted mechanism for maintenance/cost sharing.2) Evaluate Assumption I: A belief that “most will not use” is not necessary for imposing tolls and is counter to typical objectives (encouraging use of faster infrastructure).3) Evaluate Assumption II: The decision does not need to presume failure to recover costs; tolls are often used precisely to attempt recovery.Verification / Alternative check:If many vehicles do use the road, the toll decision is still rational. If costs are recoverable, tolling remains sensible. Therefore neither I nor II is a must-have assumption.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
• Only I or only II: Each is unnecessary for the action.• Either I or II: Neither is required.• Both: Even stronger and incorrect.Common Pitfalls:Equating potential motives (revenue, regulation) with specific pessimistic beliefs. Avoid reading more than what the decision minimally requires.
Final Answer:Neither Assumption I nor II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments