Curioustab Logo Curioustab
Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Conclusion

Critical Reasoning — Conclusions Statement: The Prime Minister stated that the government will make every possible effort for the upliftment of poor farmers and farmhands. Which conclusion(s) follow?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:The statement promises maximum effort toward a specific group's upliftment. We must test two sweeping conclusions: (I) everyone else has already benefited; (II) no serious efforts were made earlier for any group. Neither should be accepted unless the original statement entails it.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Commitment: 'every possible effort' for poor farmers and farmhands.
  • Conclusion I: All non-target groups have already enjoyed development benefits.
  • Conclusion II: Historically, there were no serious efforts for any section of society.

Concept / Approach:

  • Policy intent does not reveal historical distribution of benefits or absence of prior efforts.
  • Do not overgeneralize beyond the scope of the statement.

Step-by-Step Solution:

The promise of future effort for a group does not imply that every other group has already benefited. Conclusion I does not follow.Nothing is said about the past intensity of efforts for any section; thus II also does not follow.

Verification / Alternative check:

Even if other groups have or have not benefited, the statement alone cannot settle it. Similarly, earlier efforts could have existed; the statement neither confirms nor denies.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Any option claiming I, II, or both adds content not in the original sentence. Hence only 'Neither I nor II' is justified.

Common Pitfalls:

Mistaking targeted promises as evidence of neglect or achievement for others.

Final Answer:

Neither I nor II follows
← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion