Analytical Reasoning – Evaluate the conclusions from the given statement Statement: Good voice is a natural gift; however, one must keep practising to improve and excel in the field of music.

Introduction / Context:
This critical-reasoning item tests how to read a normative statement and decide which conclusions necessarily follow. The statement has two parts: first, a condition about a “good voice” being a natural gift; second, a requirement that practice is needed to improve and excel in music. We are asked to judge two conclusions: I) Natural gifts need nurturing and care. II) Even if your voice is not good, you can simply keep practising (and that suffices).

Given Data / Assumptions:

• A “good voice” is a natural gift.
• Practice is required to improve and excel.
• No claim is made about people with a poor voice being able to reach excellence solely through practice.

Concept / Approach:
Translate the author’s intent into logical implications. The sentence asserts that possession of a natural gift alone is not enough; it must be cultivated through consistent practice. That idea supports the broader principle that natural gifts require nurturing. However, it does not assert that practice can replace the absence of the gift, nor that practice alone guarantees excellence for anyone regardless of starting point.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:
Only conclusion I follows