Statement & Argument — Should using a mobile phone while driving be banned? Arguments: I. Yes; mobile use while driving frequently causes accidents. II. No; banning would create inconvenience for mobile users.

Introduction / Context:
Road-safety policy prioritizes reduction of crashes and fatalities. A strong argument should address safety outcomes, not user convenience.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Distraction impairs reaction time and situational awareness.
• Hands-free exceptions or alternatives (pulling over) can mitigate inconvenience.

Concept / Approach:
Argument I directly targets the core policy metric—accident reduction—making it strong. Argument II elevates convenience, which is secondary and manageable by alternative behaviors, so it is weak.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Safety relevance—strong.II: Convenience over safety—weak.

Final Answer:
Only Argument I is strong.