Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Transport policy weighs public health against private costs. Strong arguments align with societal externalities (pollution, health burden), especially where cleaner alternatives exist.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Argument I appeals to environmental externalities—a core regulatory objective—making it strong. Argument II focuses on private loss, which can be mitigated by phased timelines or incentives and does not override the public interest; thus, as stated, weak.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Public health relevance—strong.II: Private hardship without policy solution—weak.
Final Answer:
Only Argument I is strong.
Discussion & Comments